Category Archives: EMF

Graphene Is The ‘Vaccine’ Killer

And 5G Is It’s Booster To Take You Out

That’s right…..the fake ‘vaccines’ have graphene in them, along with some other stuff that actually has nothing to do with strengthening immunity.

What is graphene?

Graphene is the name for a single layer (monolayer) sheet of carbon atoms that are bonded together in a repeating pattern of hexagons. This sheet is only one atom thick.

Monolayers of graphene are transparent and will become black when stacked on top of each other to form graphite. Since a typical carbon atom has the unique structure of graphene, it possesses other amazing characteristics: Its high electron mobility is 100x faster than silicon; it conducts heat 2x better than diamond; its electrical conductivity is 13x better than copper; it absorbs only 2.3% of reflecting light; it is impervious so that even the smallest atom (helium) can’t pass through a defect-free monolayer graphene sheet with a thickness of about 0.33 nanometers. There are about 3 million layers of graphene in a 1 mm thick sheet of graphite.

Harder than diamond yet more elastic than rubber; tougher than steel yet lighter than aluminum – graphene is the strongest known material.

What is graphene oxide?

Graphene oxide (GO) is a single atom carbon layer where both surfaces of the layer are modified by oxygen containing functional groups. In And 5G Is It’s Booster To Take You Outmulti-layer graphene oxide, the carbon layers are separated by functional groups bonded to each layer of carbon atoms.

Although GO – like graphene – is also a 2 Dimensional material, its properties are very different from that of graphene. It does not absorb visible light, has a lower electric conductance compared to that of graphene, and demonstrates significantly higher chemical activity.

The use of graphene-based materials in pharmaceutical nanotechnology has recently received more attention due to their unique chemical structure and physicochemical properties—including an ultra-high surface area, optical, thermal and electrical conductivities, and a good biocompatibility.

It’s important to keep in mind that there is always a significant lag time between the existing uses of new technology and the public being informed of those uses. This is particularly true when the new technology will be used by the military/intelligence organizations or for other nefarious purposes.

Some of the most promising applications of graphene are publicized as being in electronics (as transistors and interconnects), detectors (as sensor elements) and thermal management. The first graphene field-effect transistors (FETs) have already been created and used for nano analog communication or nano digital applications.

Medical nanotechnology researchers (DARPA?) have created nanobots, a popular term for molecules with a unique property that enables them to be programmed to carry out a specific task.

An ever-increasing number of research groups are exploiting programmable self-assembly properties of nucleic acids in creating rationally designed nano-shapes, nano-machines and nano-electronic devices that can self-assemble for many different uses. These devices include nano-routers, nano-antennas, and nano-circuit boards.

A key feature of graphene that is rarely mentioned is the fact that the single layer sheets are extremely sharp…..sharper than a razor blade, while being extremely strong and stable. They can best be described as razor blades.

When graphene is injected into the body and interacts with biological blood or tissue, the graphene picks up hydrogen and becomes graphene hydroxide. The OH (hydroxy) groups can then split off a proton which leaves a negative charge affecting the whole graphene sheet and making it highly acidic and damaging to red blood cells.

The photo below shows what healthy blood cells look like:

And here’s what damaged blood cells look like… a coagulated mosaic of misshapen cells:

The following photo from a ‘vaccinated’ individual contains a graphene sheet and graphene tube surrounded by damaged and coagulated blood cells, with just a few healthy cells.

The next photo below is at the same magnification as the one above and contains a huge graphene tube. Note that blood cells are repelled away from the tube on the left side and attached to the tube on the right side. Since graphene is magnetic when inside the body, this explains the different polarities exhibited here.

And 5G Is It’s Booster To Take You Out

Graphene sheets suspend well in water due to their negative charge. This, in turn, leads to the graphene spreading out homogeneously throughout the circulatory system. This ends up being Russian roulette. It cuts the blood vessels. The inner lining of the blood vessels, the epithelium, is extremely smooth, like a mirror, and it is cut up by these graphene razor blades. These blades circulate throughout the body, continually damaging that inner lining.

At the same time some of the graphene tubes and sheets can block capillaries and arteries, with devastating effects when this occurs in the heart and lungs. We’ve all seen countless videos of athletes dropping on the field and people suddenly passing out while talking in front of an audience. And then there’s all those cases of myocarditis suddenly appearing out of nowhere. These are just some of the many possible health issues related to graphene damaged blood cells. The ultimate result is organ and system failure with a visit from the grim reaper.

Toxicological tests do not show anything. When autopsies are performed they typically don’t find anything. Graphene is a relatively new material with many toxicologists having no knowledge of it or it’s destructive potential.

People bleed to death on the inside. Athletes that are dropping dead, normally have fast flowing blood. The faster the blood flows the more damage the razor blades do.

Anyone injecting this into the blood is a murderer.

People who collapse immediately after ‘vaccination’ and have a seizure have had bad luck with Russian roulette. Very likely a vein was hit by the syringe.

The mRNA (messenger RNA) spike protein story is a diversion from the real destructive ingredient in these fake ‘vaccines’. People do not collapse immediately after injection from mRNA in their system.

Any ‘alternative’ doctors or ‘alternative’ media personalities that are pushing the Spike Protein story are more than likely, at worst, controlled opposition actors and at best, willfully ignorant.

The real issue with the spike protein myth is that there is no Covid-19 virus or any other virus. No virus has ever been isolated or purified or sequenced.

Take a look at the following Substack post explaining the virus myth:

Ending The Virus Myth Is Critical

So let’s get back to graphene……

Dr. Pablo Campra and Ricardo Delgado Martin, along with other doctors and researchers, has identified graphene oxide in every vaccine they’ve studied. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid published an intensive investigation and analysis of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ proving that graphene oxide is present in those ‘vaccines’.

The following link is to Dr. Campra’s short overview of his research:

PRESENTACIÓN INFORME TÉCNICO FINAL DR.CAMPRA – ENGLISH VERSION

And here’s a link to his final report, which also contains images:

DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID19 VACCINES

After this Pfizer study, researchers discovered that graphene was contained in all brands of Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ they analyzed so they began to study the toxicity or cytotoxicity that graphene oxide has on the body.

Here’s what they found: Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenicity, thrombi. Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting. Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations. Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione, which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants, causes alteration of the immune system, collapse of the immune system and A cytokine storm. Inhaled graphene oxide spreads evenly throughout the alveolar tract and causes bilateral pneumonias. Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and possible loss of taste and smell: anosmia.

In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe COVID-19 ‘disease’. When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological COVID-19 disease.

Another group of researchers also found graphene in the 2019 & 2020 Flu ‘vaccines’.

You may recall that Wuhan city in China was where the Covid-19 pandemic supposedly originated. Every resident of Wuhan had been required to get a Flu ‘vaccine’ prior to the outbreak. As mentioned above, these Flu ‘vaccines’ contained graphene.

The graphene molecule has the ability to inject electrons into other biological substances depending on the electromagnetic environment and temperature. If you have a molecule that’s an electron injector, as soon as you activate it, it starts throwing charges wherever it goes. And, of course, that destroys everything. You charge the molecules, and if the molecules are saturated with a charge that they shouldn’t carry, then they’re destroyed. They break down. 

So when the perpetrators dial up the 5G frequency again, the graphene oxide may activate and start injecting electrons into anything surrounding it, along with anything that comes near it. All it takes is for the graphene to stick to a cell or other cells and start ejecting electrons. And of course, molecules, cells, organisms in general, have a limited capacity to react to this kind of scenario before they destruct.

Graphene has an affinity for the heart and for the head. It may be because of the number of nerves in those areas or simply because of the temperature. There seems to be something there that is attracting it to those two places. It could be that the electrical activity generated by the brain is what is attracting it. Then, as it attaches there, the pericardium becomes inflamed, the myocardium becomes inflamed, the brain becomes inflamed. It creates problems particularly in those two places. 

There are various predisposing factors that make people get sicker than others. But what is it that the perpetrators of this operation put on us intentionally, without any benefit, and, apparently, as a joke? The use of facemasks, and the recommendation to wear them particularly after taking the shots. 

It turns out that when we breathe, our blood becomes more acidified.  And what does graphene do? It can receive electrical energy, transform it, increase it, and then send it back. So what do you call Graphene Oxide when activated? The nanomaterial comes in as graphene oxide —it’s present in the ‘vaccine’ vials as graphene oxide (GO)— but what happens when it’s going to act?  Hydrogen is added to it. An acidic hydrogen atom. Hydrochloric acid is the same as muriatic acid. It’s a very rich source of hydrogen that burns, and it’s what gives the acidity to the graphene. 

So, when you wear a mask, and your blood becomes acidic, it activates the graphene in your blood more easily, and then it’s called reduced graphene oxide (rGO). So, that acidity that comes from wearing a mask —because you’re breathing your own carbonic acid— activates and converts the graphene oxide into reduced graphene oxide faster, which increases the damage caused by the graphene.

By receiving external signals there are changes in the electromagnetic field that cause the graphene molecule to start emitting electrons in certain directions or all directions. In other words, emitting charges. This generates a destructive energy imbalance in any surrounding tissues or other substances. You are introducing energy that is multiplied many times in the same place in the body from a wave that comes from any point outside the body. So you can go walking down the street calmly with your graphene in your body —and nothing happens to you yet because your body more or less accepts it— but when that signal comes and hits the graphene… Goodbye. 

Many individuals have discovered that they become magnetic after taking the Covid-19 shot. This is due to the fact that graphene becomes highly magnetic when it comes in contact with biological molecules. This magnetic phenomenon can also turn inoculated people into superconductors and also stores energy that can be measured with a multimeter in certain areas of the body, such as the injection site and the forehead.

The following video links demonstrate this magnetism effect:

Dr. José Luis Sevillano on authorities and doctors who still don’t explain the magnetic phenomenon

La Quinta Columna: Graphene is being injected into the population.

The magnetic effect created by graphene is a critical link to the effect of 5G EMF on those who have been inoculated with the fake ‘vaccines’.

Covid-19 is not a new disease but a new name for radiation sickness.

The worst symptoms are a mixture of neurological symptoms such as short-term memory loss, lack of concentration, headaches, or hemicraneal paresthesias, extreme tiredness, muscle, and joint pain or dermatological problems, as well as patients with thrombi, loss of vision or blurred vision, tinnitus, stomach problems or mental fog. That’s to say, the whole picture of the symptomatology of exposure to electromagnetic fields.

We also know that this disease is caused by the electro-frequencies emitted by 5G antennas. Although both inoculated and non-inoculated people are being affected by the radiation emitted by the 5G antennas, those who carry graphene oxide in their bodies and live near 5G antennas are the ones who are having the most adverse effects.

And hospitals usually have 5G antennas. So…..

The other key to the original Covid-19 outbreak in China was the fact that Wuhan was the first city globally to turn on 5G millimeter wave technology. And people started dropping in the streets. So 5G causes radiation sickness (big surprise,eh?) and when graphene is added to the mix it significantly increases the damage to the brain and body of those injected, to the point where they can instantly drop dead.

And of course as you probably know, the elderly population, particularly in Rest Homes, were the first to be murdered with forced flu shots and forced ‘vaccine’ shots. Many of these Rest Homes also have 5G small cell antennas close by. The perpetrators of this genocide knew that there would be no public outcry, since old people have deliberately and consistently been labeled as useless eaters just using up increasingly scarce resources.

Something that worries the doctors studying this is that graphene oxide not only makes the inoculated ones more susceptible to electrofrequencies, but it turns them into living multipliers of frequencies. Therefore, they’re being irradiated not only externally but internally at the same time. And, in turn, they could be making unvaccinated people sick.

Many non-inoculated people wonder why being around inoculated people makes them feel sick. Many think they have contracted the famous fashionable Covid-19 virus or some supposed variant. However, vaccinated/graphenated people can emit frequencies to the point that they cause dizziness, heart palpitations along with a whole list of other effects on those receiving these damaging frequencies. Many women, for example, who have been close to a vaccinated person, say they experience an alteration in their menstrual cycle. The effect depends on the signal they have received, on their body temperature, on their level of physical activity which increases those effects, along with where in their body they have vulnerabilites that will be the most affected.

Graphene is simply emitting signals. That’s why people feel sick. They feel sick because they’re being irradiated. They experience radiation poisoning.

Another key discovery by the La Quinta Columna group was the existence of microtechnology in the vaccines. At the same time they were investigating this people were noticing that they could use Bluetooth on their smart phones to pick up MAC addresses from ‘vaccinated’ people, which is disturbing since MAC addresses are used to identify electronic devices. The vaccines contain microtechnology that can transmit these MAC addresses.

A researcher working with La Quinta Columna noticed that one of the items photographed in the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid resembled nano-routers he had studied in the scientific literature about nanotechnology.

These are objects that shouldn’t be part of any vaccine and that aren’t declared among the components of the vaccines. Additionally, other types of objects have been identified and evidenced in images of blood samples from people vaccinated with coronavirus vaccines. Specifically, micronadators, crystallized graphene nanoantennas, and the famous graphene quantum dots, also known as GQD.

In the original image, a well-delimited drop can be seen in which there’s a crystalline structure of quadrangular or cubic shape. If you look closely, you can see some marks in these crystals with a regular pattern, well delimited in some cases, but limited by the optics of the microscope. The finding has been possible by isolating each quadrangular crystal by applying a process of rastering, focusing, and delimitation of the edges of the image.

Zooming in on the bottom cubic shape displayed the following:

Once this process was completed, a draft was drawn with the lines and patterns inscribed on the crystal, creating a clean outline of what actually looked like a circuit. It was very striking to find parallel and perpendicular lines with a distribution far from what would be fractal patterns, which allowed them to automatically infer the possibility that it had been the product of manufacturing.

They then looked for similar patterns in the scientific literature that had a similar scheme to the circuit that had just been drawn.

Zooming in a little bit more so you can see it better.

The result of the search was almost immediate since the pattern of a quantum dot nanorouter was found, as shown below.

This discovery is of fundamental relevance. Not only to understand the true purpose and components of coronavirus vaccines, but also to explain the existence of the phenomenon of MAC addresses visible through Bluetooth on many mobile devices.

The context of the discovery is as follows. Before proceeding to the explanation of the finding, it’s worth recalling the context in which it is framed, to ensure its understanding and subsequent deepening. First of all, it should be borne in mind that graphene and its derivatives, graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes, form part of the components of vaccines, as has already been explained in this post. The properties of graphene are exceptional from a physical, thermodynamic, electronic, mechanical, and magnetic point of view. Its characteristics allow it to be used as a superconductor. It’s an electromagnetic wave absorbing material, a signal emitter-receiver, a quantum antenna which makes it possible to create advanced nano and micrometric scale electronics.

The scientific literature is very clear about the health implications for the human body. It’s notorious that graphene, graphene oxide (GO), and other derivatives such as carbon nanotubes (CNT) are toxic in almost all their forms, causing mutagenesis (or cancer, chromosomal alteration), cell death, apoptosis, necrosis, and the release of free radicals. And as a consequence of that, it increases toxicity rapidly in the lungs, favoring the cytokine storm that you know as bilateral pneumonia, genotoxicity, or DNA damage.

All those studies that that have been reviewed state “Systemic inflammation…” 

That describes Covid-19.

Immunosuppression, damage to the central nervous system, circulatory, endocrine, reproductive, urinary system, which can cause anaphylactic death, and multi-organ dysfunction.

And as stated earlier in this post, graphene is a radiomodulatable nanomaterial.

This is very important and one that people need to understand. And here’s the interaction with those radio frequency antennas. 

It’s able to absorb electromagnetic waves. 

It can also multiply radiation, acting as a nanoantenna, or else a signal repeater, a transistor. Exposure to electromagnetic radiation can cause the exfoliation of the material into smaller particles called GQDs (Graphene Quantum Dots), whose properties and physical peculiarities are enhanced due to their even smaller scale due to the “quantum hall effect,” since they act by amplifying electromagnetic signals and, with that, the emission distance, especially in environments such as the human body. Graphene quantum dots can acquire various morphologies, for example, hexagonal, triangular, circular, or irregular polygon.” 

Everything in the vaccine has a purpose. Everything.

The perpetrators of this operation are injecting something into people that, at the moment, is killing them. Part of the goal is to kill off a large number of the population, particularly in the white Western countries which have been the primary targets of the fake ‘vaccine’ operation. This makes perfect sense since the greatest resistance to the Great Globalist Totalitarian Reset is coming from white Western societies.

The clever perpetrators of this operation, have used the ‘Advocate Approach’ in order to disperse the vaccines. The numbers are not exact, but here’s a rough breakdown of that tactic: The 1st shot that people received had roughly 1 shot out of 200 containing graphene, with the remaining being saline, so that those who had no negative effects became advocates for the shots. The 2nd shot that people received had 1 shot out of 4 containing graphene, so still many more advocates for the shots. The 3rd shot that people took had 2 out of 4 containing graphene and the 4th shot had 3 out of 4 containing graphene, while the 5th shot had 4 out of 4 containing graphene. When this approach is combined with the individual variability of the damaging effects in different individuals, the advocacy could go on for quite a long time.

The 5G small cell transmitters are a key part of this kill off, but they serve a dual purpose in that they can also be used to monitor and control the population. When enough of the population has been killed off or sterilized the focus will shift more to control of the remaining population by modulating the signals coming from the 5G antennas. The Bluetooth nanorouters injected into every vaccinated person will be the connecting link to the mandatory ‘Smart’ phone that will be required to buy and sell or to have access to anything in the cashless society.

5G Is The Kill Shot

5G, unlike all of the other generations (G’s) of telecommunications, is technically identified as an urban radar directed energy in air emission, which requires the antenna to be designed to cause the focused energy in air for the high-speed compression of data to and from antennas designed to send and receive focused energy through a theoretical collimated and coherent signal.

The sweeping movement of the beam wave causes the positive charging of air, which is noxious to all biological life at significant distances from the antenna emission to the target acquisition zone, such is the capability of the 5G hard- and software and is the very reason this equipment is, and has been, used extensively on the battlefield as scanning environment radar and Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) for the purpose of disrupting and disabling enemy hardware, as well as biological assets, i.e. humans.

It’s a military weapon folks.

The telecoms industry and other regulatory bodies have continually denied the real purpose and existence of the radiation dangers posed by the deployment of 5G technologies; they have actively misled the public by issuing demonstrably false press releases through local and national media, as well as by making false statements in courts in failed attempts to discredit experts.

“Backhaul” in the context of 5G is the term used for the technological advance that enables data to be interrogated and uplifted from multiple devices and environments simultaneously; in other words spying across the whole area, leaving no chance of any privacy.

Spectrum dominance of the 5G network from sub 3 GHz to 300 GHz poses a real risk of bodily harm from higher photon energy value frequencies that are coherent radiation emissions.

Serious critical infrastructure risks have been ignored in the unregulated rush to deploy the 5G network. The new 5G protocol will require many more, higher radiation beam wave emissions using precisely located towers at a much shorter height with
significantly larger energy demands on the electric grid and network.

The propaganda narrative of industry and agencies claiming these 5G networks use less energy is demonstrably false. The massive increase in antennas from massive multiple-in multiple-out (MIMO) antennas for 5G, plus the mini and micro relay networks, as well as increased device data usage all require further power consumption in watts.

Microwave radiation will also affect a large number of molecular structures in materials, which increases building fire risk. This is due to hydrocarbon elements in buildings breaking down due to modulated microwave radiation, which causes localized heating and the breakdown of materials. Microwave radiation at certain frequencies will excite water molecules and if there is no moisture available, other less volatile molecules will absorb the radiation and start to heat. Therefore, any material that has dried out can overheat and ignite more easily in a microwave field, a type of priming. The risks particular to the 5G radiation emissions are due to the proposed mass densification and spectrum dominance of the radiation emissions. Also, any metal objects inside a microwave field can exhibit dielectric properties that can cause sparking, which could lead to a fire; this is caused by a build-up of charged particles, energy that produces a concentrated electric field at the edge of the metal.

The Santa Rosa fires that occurred in 2017 are a devastating example of the use of Directed Energy weapons to destroy thousands of houses, leaving very little debris.

The following video link exposes the deliberate destruction in Santa Rosa:

THE GENOCIDAL CALIFORNIA FIRES OPERATION

These are all scientific phenomena that have been deliberately ignored by the regulators and industry, but the most alarming, unrecognized and unregulated issue is fatigue of materials caused by the continual bombardment of 5G data compression and focused (QAM) modulated microwave energy fields. 5G requires far more complex and focused data package compression of energy. The potential for specific frequency causing the disassociation of molecular structures of solid building materials, among other things, cannot be overstated due to the currently un-researched (?) cross-wave impacts of such high levels of energy-in-air modulated radiation emissions. This cacophony of microwave radiation pollution could lead to severe failures in larger capital equipment, including the electrical grid.

What has also been discovered is unnecessary latent power capacitance built into the 5G SMART Internet Of Things (IOT) hardware network. This large capacitance could easily be used for a possible Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) attack on cities and populations. We’ve been warned this is coming by those who plan to implement it, but of course, Russian or Chinese hackers will be blamed.

When 5G was switched on in South Korea in April 2019, it caused a number of city fires due to the documented failure of the electrical grid transformers. The South Korean government and media passed this off as having been caused by forest fires in five separate cities simultaneously all across the country when 5G was turned on, but this alleged cause does not explain the electrical grid disturbance and destruction of critical electrical grid hardware.

The telecommunications narrative for 5G is only a cover for its actual future capability and purpose, as confirmed by the total absence of environmental risk research and insurance liability cover for harm. The future domain for the battle space and the ongoing deployment of 5G technological advance include 5G weapons for warfare across cities, towns and countryside. The domain includes psychological warfare technologies, including control and dissemination of information through social media to obscure the real purpose of 5G as a warfare system.

“The Fifth Generation mission-space represents a new environment in which future operations will take place. Special operations forces are already debating the opportunities and risks from the IOT 5G networks, with assassination through the Lethal Autonomous Weapons System (LAWS) that can be used to eliminate targeted individuals.

The military industrial complex across the world know only too well the advantages of using electromagnetic weapon systems for battlefield interrogation, namely 5G, and have done so since the emergence of the technology during the Second World War. What is also well understood is the vast body of published scientific data showing the detrimental health and environmental effects from the current telecommunications networks. 5G adds a whole range of further risks to the environment, and to the health of the population.

This is not an argument that can now be disputed; mission creep and the planning of
asymmetrical, unconventional warfare across cities should be of great concern, especially to the civilian population as they are becoming the target of an Orwellian technocratic, fascist regime.

In that case, who would be controlling the spying urban interrogation radar and directed energy in air weapon systems?

Many opportunities are currently under discussion across the defense industry, focusing on the capability of the 5G urban networks to tag the population with metamaterial antennas, while serious concerns and risks are seemingly ignored.

Vaccines have been shown in a number of studies to contain toxic metal contaminants,
including “inexplicable” levels of nanometal contamination. This phenomenon is far from inexplicable if the research scientists who carried out this study had knowledge of the defense industry goals and the metamaterial ingredients that can be used to enhance urban 5G interrogation technologies, as well as various other nano material development projects.

Metals are almost universally radar-reflective and therefore are visible for use as a means of detecting objects. “Wetware” is the name given to biological structures operating in the battlefield space that are far more difficult to track and trace or attack using LIDAR, RADAR or DEWs. Metals are strong reflectors of electromagnetic waves and allow for increased detection and resolution from battlefield interrogation technologies. Specific metal shapes in polymers can be used for their dielectric properties to deflect and absorb the reflection and interrogation capability of current radar systems. Without using this precise shape and polymer encapsulation, metal contamination in the form of metamaterials allows for a higher resolution of the target.

After the Covid-19 vaccine technology is injected into the body, the target acquisition of wetware is far more precise and the technological field can be used to gather biometric data. It is envisaged that wearable and portable electronic devices that are currently in use to connect the person to the Cloud will become redundant due to these and further technological advances. The Neuralink control network uses implanted nano technology antennas that can gather such data and upload it to the Cloud; these innovations are well beyond the planning phase and all part of the future battlefield space.

Dr. Robert O. Young’s research confirms that the Covid-19 injections have been fully loaded with metamaterials, namely graphite, ferrous oxide nanoparticulates (graphene).

The video link below discusses the connection between 5G and a condition called Covid Lung:

HOW GRAPHENE OXIDE & 5G EMF CREATE ‘COVID LUNG’ – DR. JOSE LUIS SEVILLANO

This shocking discovery is confirmed through research carried out on victims, as well as thousands of anecdotal videos showing electromagnetic radiation emissions; together with magnets and metal objects reacting to the injection sites of those vaccinated with the Covid-19 serum. Other biomarkers used include SM-102, which is a toxic phospholipid present in the Moderna Covid-19 vaccines, a synthetic luciferin that improves bioluminescence-imaging luciferase.

The video link below discusses luciferase in the vaccines:

PFIZER WHISTLEBLOWER – THE VACCINE CONTAINS LUCIFERASE

Luciferins can be activated using electromagnetic radiation to create a bioluminescence of the subject.

Facial recognition technologies, part of the 5G technology toolbox, can then be used to track and trace the contaminated subject across the environmental space.

The deaths and significant biological damage in the population caused by the Covid-19 experimental mRNA vaccine medical intervention have now been documented in nearly one thousand published scientific papers. Covid-19 injections are now related to blood clotting, myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cancer, among others. This is confirmed by irrefutable science and government-gathered data from the UK Health and Security Agency, which shows Covid-19 vaccines to be unsafe and ineffective.

The vast majority of the populations across the West, in particular those of the Five Eyes community, the Anglosphere intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, have been injected without their knowledge with nano metamaterial antennas and are unfortunately going to suffer increased mortality rates due partially to localized reflecting radiation emissions from the 5G urban radar.

Many of these same willfully ignorant people, who narrowed their information to official sources and condemned those who exposed the actual facts about the shots they took, are also suffering serious physical damage and increased mortality rates due to the fact that graphene sheets are sharper than razor blades and damage blood vessels throughout the body.

The Video link below discusses how this destruction occurs:

DEATH BY 1000 CUTS – THE COVID KILL SHOT

All of the known coronavirus symptoms can be attributed to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.

5G has been identified in a number of published papers as the actual cause of the pandemic, the start of which coincided with the switching on of the 5G network in Wuhan province, whose population had just been vaccinated with a mandated flu vaccination. 5G has the potential to deliver ionizing energy levels that would cause immune system suppression, leaving the body at risk of disease.

The Covid-19 pathogen has not been isolated or purified and currently no government
agency can provide the isolate or evidence of its actual existence.

A Covid-19 virus or any other virus has never been isolated or purified and will never be isolated or purified since viruses do not exist. The virus myth has just been used as just another form of terrorist to create fear and manipulation in the willfully ignorant population. The original notion of a virus may have just been an error of analysis, but for many decades now it has been utilized to generate fear and control along with the parasitic extraction of many trillions of dollars from the gullible public.

The following Substack link discusses this insidious virus lie:

Ending The Virus Myth Is Critical

Coincidentally, the PCR test was never able to identify a live virus or pathogen and is the fundamental basis for the lockdowns across the world, which have been used with great effect to terrorize the world’s population into believing that Covid-19 exists as a live virus and that the only survival strategy is taking a bio weapon technology masquerading as a vaccine.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have now removed the PCR test as a diagnostic tool, after it was misused, which is evidence of its deliberate use to create fear and distress among a misinformed population.

Research scientists and medical doctors across the world have been gagged, threatened and vilified in the media and discredited as conspiracy theorists by governments and their agents when they have spoken out to oppose this trans-globalist agenda.

5G urban emissions are designed to deliver chronic radiation exposure that will undoubtedly increase the genotoxic effects on all the biological life that the radiation comes into contact with. Evidence from areas blanketed by the less powerful and less densified radiation emissions of 4G networks have already shown significant detrimental effects on wildlife.

Smaller biological organisms that make up the whole ecosystem have less protection from man-made radiation emissions and can therefore show effects in a more visible,
incontrovertible way. The acute lack of small insects has been shown to be caused primarily by new experimental man-made radiation emissions, including light emitting diodes (LED).

The addition of nano metamaterials through implant, injection, and environmental
contamination will create a cytotoxic environment detrimental to all biological life. Localized reflection from the metamaterial antennas or the nanometal-contaminated vaccinated entities will add to a substantial increase in radiation exposures, especially across cities. 5G backhaul technology can now capture and interrogate multiple data points, conversations, as well as bodily biometrics and movements 24 hours per day, every day, to the detriment of the Covid19-vaccinated for the rest of what is likely to be a limited life expectancy, as well as of those unable to remove themselves from these 5G radiation networks and nanoparticle-polluted environments.

Man-made magnetic fields accompany the digitized (QAM) beam wave,
which increases emissions and creates an energy vibration disturbance of the nano
metamaterial particulates in the contaminated vaccinated body; this will significantly increase the cytotoxicity of the technologies on an unsuspecting mass population of vaccinated persons. The mandating of this technological experiment in the form of a vaccine that increases sterility and causes untimely death is a criminal enterprise by organizations and individuals who have failed to recognize the compartmentalized development of weapon systems required for the control and planned depopulation agenda.

The mass depopulation intelligence was confirmed in defense circles as early as 2017 by the Deagel weapons hardware intelligence group, which predicted many millions of casualties occurring in countries across the West by 2025, with the population of the United States being reduced to around 100 million, which syncs with roughly two thirds of the population taking the death shots.

At the root of the flagrant disregard of all ethical and legal obligations
is the overarching military battlefield agenda, which dictates that war should now be waged against civilian populations.

5G is a compartmentalized weapons deployment masquerading as a benign technological advance for enhanced communications and faster downloads. The globalist false propaganda falls away with one simple undisputed fact: their PCR test patent for Covid-19, which was filed in 2015, was never able to identify a live virus, so that it could be utilized to terrorize ignorant and unsuspecting populations across the world into taking a Covid-19 vaccine polluted with a nano antenna technology to hook victims up to the 5G network.

Emerging 5G, autonomous, augmented reality technologies, often referred to by the
manufacturers as “killer tech”, will prove to be exactly that. The laissez-faire approach
adopted by regulatory bodies and the telecoms industry encouraged the total disregard of the known biological harm from increasing levels of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation arising from the mass deployment of these technologies, which were developed for battlefield use.The following video link is to a video by Joe Imbriano, where he pulls no punches about the 5G death shot:

The Covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions data read like the destruction of mankind as millions of North American citizens die and are injured in this medical experiment that is in breach of the Nuremberg Code and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The fact that the Covid-19 vaccines vector data were developed in biological chemical weapons laboratories proves that they are only masquerading as vaccines, with the emerging data of sterilization, ill health and death across the West revealing their true purpose.

The 5G network has the capability to target acquire and attack the vaccinated due
to their nano metamaterial antenna Covid-19 vaccine. Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) require the 5G networks to maintain their geoposition and navigate their environment to the target; these weapons cannot rely on satellite (high altitude balloon) communications due to the potential for inclement weather events and signal latency to disrupt their signals so they must have localized 5G networks for the upcoming cityscape battlefield environment, for assassination capability and for battlefield domination in planned future wars.

The compartmentalization of weapons systems development has played a crucial role in not alerting those within the regulatory authorities and telecommunications industry to the real purpose and intentions of those ultimately driving and funding the deployment of 5G and biological chemical weapons masquerading as Covid-19 vaccines for a planned control and command kill grid.

The world is blindly following the plans of the technocratic elite and the
military-industrial-pharma complex to terminate large numbers within populations across the world with no regard to the primary legislation. God-given rights and laws enshrined for the protection of men and women have been disregarded by these cult-like forces in their depopulation, sterilization and mass murder agenda.

5G is a weapon system, a crime against humanity so monstrous that even an educated person may find it unbelievable on first inspection of the facts.

The prima facie evidence of this globalist depopulation agenda is unequivocal and should be tested in the courts so that the conspirators involved in this murderous plan can be brought to justice.

This is the greatest crime ever to be perpetrated on mankind and all of God’s creation.

The following video link is to a video by Joe Imbriano, where he pulls no punches about the 5G death shot:

5G IS THE KILL SHOT

Follow me on Substack:

Terra Times

 

X-Files Laid Out The Covid Operation 6 Years Ago

The link below is to a video from The X-Files Season 10 Episode 6, which was released in 2016. This episode reveals the insidious ongoing operation that we’ve been subjected to since 2020 starting with the Covid plandemic.

X FILES LAID OUT THE COVID OPERATION 6 YEARS AGO

As usual there’s a bit of misdirection with the discussion of viruses, which don’t actually exist. The link below is to a video making this​_ clear:

Ending The Virus Myth Is Critical

The connection of EMF to climate control is mentioned, but there is no mention of EMF Millimeter waves and 5G as a key part of the Surveillance/Kill grid. This is a notable omission, since it’s integral to the overall plan for depopulation and Total Control. The link below is to a video discussing 5G:

5G IS THE KILL SHOT

The link below is to a video discussing the direct connection between 5G and the supposed Covid ‘infection’:

THERE’S A DIRECT CONNECTION BETWEEN 5G NETWORKS AND COVID-1984 OUTBREAKS

Follow me on Substack:

Terra Times

A Visual clearly demonstrating the cynicism of the psychopathic Parasites running this shit show

If you have one of these ‘small’ 5G cells this close to your house, then you are living the life of a doomed lab rat, inside a gilded cage.

But then again, it could be your ticket to virtue signal, since you’ll be actively participating in the depopulation program, necessitated by the parasitic oligarchs’ fabricated ‘globe warming’ operation. 

Populus vulti decepi, ergo decepiatur

Do Electric Cars Emit EMF and Is It Dangerous? YES!

Do Electric Cars emit EMF and Is It Dangerous

Most modern vehicles have a wide number of onboard electronics aimed at providing convenience and safety. These electronics emit a lot of radiation that is dangerous to your health. If you have an electric car or a hybrid car, the danger is even higher.

All electrical devices, including the big batteries and the powerful electric motors found in hybrid cars, do emit a lot of EMF radiation. This could be subjecting you to a lot of health risks.

The radiation generated by the electronics inside the car bounce back when they hit the metal casing of the car. This is known as a Faraday cage effect. As the radiation bounces back, it is trapped inside the car increasing the amount of radiation you are exposed to when you are in the car.

Electric cars emit two types of radiation:

  • Extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation is emitted by electronic devices, the batteries, and other internal circuitry inside the vehicle.
  • Radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation comes from wireless devices inside the vehicle connecting with devices and technology inside and outside the car. For example, radiation from devices will be connecting via cellular network, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi.

Sources of EMF in Tesla Cars

Just like other electric vehicles, Tesla cars expose you to a lot of radiation while driving or just sitting down inside the vehicle when it is in use. Some of the sources of EMF radiation in the car include:

  • In-car Wi-Fi system
  • Bluetooth system
  • Car alarm
  • In-car computer system
  • Start system
  • Keyless entry
  • Car battery

According to a study by Scripps Clinic Research Foundation, high levels of EMF from EVs make the drivers drowsy and sleepy while driving. Based on the study, drivers who are exposed to high levels of EMF while driving are likely to sleep 52 minutes faster than those exposed to low levels of EMF.

 

In addition, exposure to radiation while driving can result in headaches, neck stiffness, and dry eyes or blurred vision. Long-term exposure to these sources of EMF radiation may have long-term health complications.EMF Radiation from Electric Cars

According to Dr. Joel Moskowitz at the University of California Berkeley, hybrid cars and other electric cars have increased levels of ELF that cause cancer, increase the level of oxidative stress that leads to DNA fragmentation, cause cell damage, fertility issues, drowsiness, etc.

To reduce the amount of exposure to EMF, you should switch off the use of EMF sources like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and computer systems when you are in the car. You should use a wired connection to play music in your car instead of using wireless transmission via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi.

Lastly, ensure your phone is put in airplane mode while driving to reduce exposure to EMF radiation. You can also use EMF Protection Guards in your car to neutralize the effects of the EMF generated inside your car.

5G Is the Kill Shot

5G, 5G, 5G……It’s supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread.

Take a look at this short video below, which presents:

IEEE Propaganda: Everything You Need to Know About 5G

A key quote from the video above is “but what exactly is a 5G network? The truth is that experts can’t tell us what 5G actually is because they don’t even know yet . . .”

“So, why is the FCC voting on regulations with NO CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE for a yet-to-be-defined technology?

Never underestimate the lobbying power of BIG TELECOM MONEY in Washington, DC or in our State Capitols, to execute the Republican/ALEC agenda in an era when MONEY = FREE SPEECH. We are witnessing a disaster that rapes and pillages the public interest to further enrich our already-obscenely-profitable and monopoly-power-drunk Telecom firms which are grabbing for all they can get during this short-lived Trump administration.”(1)

“Since much of the US population is unwisely bathing itself 24/7/365 in data-carrying, pulsed, Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation), it is important to understand what we are actually doing to ourselves, our loved ones and our environment. Duration of exposure to these micro-second pulses of electrical power, not intensity, is the most important factor.

Therefore, always-on wireless infrastructure antennas are hazardous to one’s health — that is why wireless telecommunications base station antennas belong 200 feet off the ground and at least 2,500 feet away from homes, schools, hospitals, public buildings, parks and wilderness areas. That is why installation of so-called “Small Cell” Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) anywhere near second-story bedroom windows is a disaster — no matter what government guideline is quoted to justify this assault.

The common thread that ties of WiFi, 4G and 5G together is the reliance on OFDM/OFDMA modulation — sophisticated mathematical transformations that pack huge amounts of digital data onto carrier microwaves in order to transmit the data through the atmosphere. The pulsed microwaves either penetrate or reflect off of anything in their path: any flora, fauna and man-made structures you can imagine, including human adults and children, pets, and already threatened species of pollinators birds, bees and butterflies.

What is WiFi and why should you turn off your Wireless Router/Access Point?

Pulsed Microwave Radiation is the Foundation of Wireless Mobile Data. Microwave Radiation, when used to transfer data from Point-A to Point-B, is comprised of micro-second pulses of electrical power sprayed through the atmosphere. Microwaves either penetrate or reflect off of anything or anyone in their path, The data transferred are electrical pulses or ”bullets” traveling at the speed of light, about 670 million miles per hour. These pulses of data can cause biological harm to many living organisms, including humans.

How Do Microwaves Radiate Over Long Distances?

Electromagnetic waves are produced whenever charged particles are accelerated. In the near-field region (within 3-4 wavelengths from the source antenna charges), waves are incoherent, erratic and choppy with high micro-second peaks of Electric and Magnetic fields.  This creates a toxic “hell-stew” of powerful zaps, crackles and pops that are difficult to characterize with any degree of accuracy.  Unfortunately, this is the range where people typically hold their wireless devices. Whenever one sends/receives digital data wirelessly from their device, a toxic, spherical cloud 36″ to 48″ in diameter forms around the device, exposing everyone nearby to peaks of RF/MW radiation.

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is neither an accurate nor a scientific measure of the hazards created by this mixture of Electric and Magnetic fields in the near-field region. SAR is a misleading ‘average of an average’, designed to hide the peaks of Electric and Magnetic power that surround one’s device. These peaks of power interrupt the sensitive electrical signals of our body and causes DNA and neurological damage, suppress the immune system, and interrupt hormone production and regulation.

How Do Microwaves Send and Receive Digital Data?

A wavelength carries massive numbers of erratic pulses of digital data, that wirelessly transmit text, image, audio and video data to and from computers, tablets, phones and the (predicted) billions of IoT (Internet of Things) machines, appliances, “things,” sensors and devices. Unfortunately, the microwaves used for this purpose are not the smooth sine waves you may have learned about in text books that describe the transmission of visible light (430 to 770 THz) or Alternating Current electrical power (60 Hz).

Natural Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) come from two main sources: the sun, and thunderstorm activity, with the Earth’s Schumann Resonance centering around 7.83 Hz. Being Man-made, pulsed RF/MW radiation differs from natural EMF. Man-made Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF/EMF) and the resulting RF/MW radiation are defined by the equation: c = f λ, where c = the speed of light, f = the frequency, and λ = the wavelength. This means that since c is a constant, as frequency increases, wavelength decreases. Frequency is measured in a unit called Hertz, which represents the number of cycles or oscillations of a wave in one second. The unit Hertz is named after Heinrich Rudolph Hertz a German scientist who first demonstrated that electromagnetic waves radiate at a constant speed.

In order to transmit digital data, an antenna’s microchips distort the waves’ shape or pace to modulate (encode) the data stream onto the carrier waves at the source before the antenna transmits them. At the destination, other microchips demodulate (decode) the data stream so the destination device can display the text/image or play the audio/video. A modem is a device that literally modulates and demodulates data streams; engineers shortened the name to modem. Each antenna in this scheme is a two-way microwave transmitter/receiver.

There are an infinite number of combinations of wavelength, frequency, intensity and modulation, the mathematical transformations that encode data onto a carrier wave. Each combination is a new digital fingerprint that uniquely identifies a new man-made toxic agent that, when transmitted into the air, instantly fills our homes, schools, workplaces or public spaces.

Microwaves have different properties, depending on their wavelength. The longer waves (20″ down to 5″) travel further and penetrate deeper into buildings and living tissue. The shorter waves (0.5″ down to 0.1″) are called millimeter waves (mm-waves) because they measure from 10 mm (at 30,000 MHz = 30 GHz), down to 1 mm (at 300,000 MHz = 300 GHz). The mm-waves are not as efficient because they don’t travel as far, tend to reflect off of buildings, and deposit mainly into the eyes and skins of living organisms.”(3)

A key target for 5G frequency use is 60 GHz:

William Webb: The 5G Myth And why Consistent Connectivity is the Goal

Some have suggested that 5G will be whatever interesting developments happen from 2018 onwards. There is much political capital expended in claiming that 5G will be deployed early in a country. MNOs and Governments will simply claim from 2018 onwards that they have 5G even though all that has been deployed is evolved 4G. For all the debate, 5G could be a label, not a technology.

End users will be told that they now have 5G even though they have not changed their handsets nor received any improvements in service. Or alternatively, in the case where 5G is the label applied to the introduction of IoT, consumers may be told that 5G is not about their handset but about the ability to connect their devices. In the US, the term 5G might be applied to fixed wireless deployments, with “5G to the home:. Given the confusion around what 5G is, this second “label whatever we have as 5G: approach could be used in Europe and the US alongside the first “limited millimeter wave deployment” approach happening in Asia Pacific.

This is the chilling observation: these planning documents for the recently installed 4G Palo Alto Small cells, show that even though the RF/MW radiation calculations were made for 6 watts of input power, the actual input power for each small cell antenna is 300 to 500 Watts and the “associated equipment” power supply cabinet is 17.5 cubic feet — one for each antenna!

Similar documents for a 2017 Verizon 4G Small Cell deployment in Weston, MA state that each antenna outputs 1,257 Watts of Effective Radiated Power (ERP), a significant RF/MW radiation exposure. These military-grade RF/MW radiation exposures do not belong in residential zones not matter what over-the-rainbow promises are being made about 5G by those who wish to profit for 4G/5G Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) installations everywhere.

As SB.649 contains no language for real-time monitoring of the levels of RF/MW radiation and no warning or detection systems if the RF/MW radiation reaches hazardous levels, then the equipment is already in place to easily increase the power input from 6 watts to 500 watts, which constitutes a Microwave Radiation weapon on every block in downtown Palo Alto — not unlike weapons the Federal Government has already designed and deployed.

Here is an actual, already designed and deployed actual millimeter wave application . . .

Military Ray Gun: Active Denial System, an Electromagnetic Radiation Weapon:

The military exploits the fact that Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation) is biologicially active while the Wireless industry denies that RF/MW radiation is biologically active. Which one is lying?

  • 5G is a pipe-dream: it is not even close to being deployed at scale. The engineers understand this. 5G is the smoke screen/hype machine being used to sell this vision to the politicians.
  • This is actually a real-estate scheme: AT&T and Verizon want to invade neighborhoods and secure cut-rate, rent-controlled access to publicly-owned structures (utility poles, light poles, traffic lights, street signs) so they can expand their operations, at will, without regulation. AT&T and Verizon will install 4G/LTE today to make obscene profits now . . . and perhaps never upgrade it to 5G.

  • Have AT&T and Verizon behaved like this in the past? Sure. Read about their promises to upgrade the copper wireline networks with fiber-optic cables. After years of promises, and a fraudulent diversion of funds that they received to install the fiber-optic cables, they determined it would lower their costs and maximize their profits to use Wireless for broadband instead — even though Wireless broadband is hazardous, extremely energy-inefficient, much less secure and much less reliable than fiber-optic to the home.
  • The real goal is to secure a new source of revenue: cell phone subscriptions are a mature (but still very profitable business); now the Wireless companies want to steal market share from Comcast and other cable companies and charge for data by the gigabyte. How to best do this? Make timely donations to politicians’ local programs to get these politicians to do their bidding, like price-fixing the access price to publicly-owned property to install powerful two-way microwave transmitters 10-15 feet from second story windows in residential neighborhoods.”(1)

More bandwidth – more dangers of 5G

“Who doesn’t want faster, bigger (or smaller), more efficient? Take wireless mobile telecommunications. Our current broadband cellular network platform, 4G (or fourth generation), allows us to transmit data faster than 3G and everything that preceded. We can access information faster now than ever before in history. What more could we want? Oh, yes, transmission speeds powerful enough to accommodate the (rather horrifying) so-called  Internet of Things. Which brings us to 5G.

Until now, mobile broadband networks have been designed to meet the needs of people. But 5G has been created with machines’ needs in mind, offering low-latency, high-efficiency data transfer. It achieves this by breaking data down into smaller packages, allowing for faster transmission times. Whereas 4G has a fifty-millisecond delay, 5G data transfer will offer a mere one-millisecond delay–we humans won’t notice the difference, but it will permit machines to achieve near-seamless communication. Which in itself  may open a whole Pandora’s box of trouble for us – and our planet.

Let’s start with some basic background on 5G technology. Faster processing speeds require more bandwidth, yet our current frequency bandwidths are quickly becoming saturated. The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.

High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticeable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas much closer together, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighborhood.

Here are some numbers to put things into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radio-frequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.”(2)

Serious health concerns:

“Definition of Microwave Sickness:

Original Merriam-Webster® link here.

a condition of impaired health . . . that is characterized by headaches, anxiety, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and difficulty in concentrating and by changes in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems and that is held to be caused by prolonged exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation”(1)

“It’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen and specified that the use of mobile phones could lead to specific forms of brain tumors.

Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

  • DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
  • oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
  • disruption of cell metabolism
  • increased blood-brain barrier permeability
  • melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
  • disruption of brain glucose metabolism
  • generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)”(2)

And then there’s the negative effects on mitochondria in the cells:

“As mentioned, the new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners.

The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigors of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR flying around us. It’s no wonder that apprehension exists over potential risks, to both human and environmental health.

Perhaps the strongest concern involves adverse effects of MMWs on human skin. This letter to the Federal Communications Commission, from Dr Yael Stein of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, outlines the main points. Over ninety percent of microwave radiation is absorbed by the epidermis and dermis layers, so human skin basically acts as an absorbing sponge for microwave radiation. Disquieting as this may sound, it’s generally considered acceptable so long as the violating wavelengths are greater than the skin layer’s dimensions. But MMW’s violate this condition.

Furthermore, the sweat ducts in the skin’s upper layer act like helical antennas, which are specialized antennas constructed specifically to respond to electromagnetic fields. With millions of sweat ducts, and 5G’s increased RFR needs, it stands to reason that our bodies will become far more conductive to this radiation. The full ramifications of this fact are presently unclear, especially for more vulnerable members of the public (e.g., babies, pregnant women, the elderly), but this technology

Furthermore, MMWs may cause our pain receptors to flare up in recognition of the waves as damaging stimuli. Consider that the US Department of Defense already uses a crowd-dispersal method called the Active Denial System, in which MMWs are directed at crowds to make their skin feel like it’s burning, and also has the ability to basically microwave populations to death from afar with this technology if they choose to do so. And the telecommunications industry wants to fill our atmosphere with MMWs?

Animal research worldwide illustrates how microwave radiation in general and MMW’s in particular can damage the eyes and immune system, cell growth rate, even bacterial resistance. An experiment at the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University showed that 60GHz millimeter-wave antennas produce thermal injuries in rabbit eyes, with thermal effects reaching below the eye’s surface. This study, meanwhile, suggests low-level MMW’s caused lens opacity–a precursor to cataracts–in rats’ eyes. A Chinese study demonstrated that eight hours’ of microwave radiation damaged rabbits’ lens epithelial cells. A Pakistani study concluded that exposure to mobile phone EMF prevented chicken embryo retinal cells from properly differentiating.

This Russian study revealed that exposing healthy mice to low-intensity, extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation severely compromised their immune systems. And a 2016 Armenian study concluded that low-intensity MMW’s not only depressed the growth of E. coli and other bacteria, but also changed certain properties and activity levels of the cells. The same Armenian study noted that MMW interaction with bacteria could lead to antibiotic resistance–distressing news, considering immunity to bacteria is already compromised due to the overuse of antibiotics.

Again, if these findings translate to humans, our rampant cellphone use would likely cause profound, adverse health effects; an increase in MMW’s as more bandwidth is introduced could further complicate the matter. But what’s also important to note here is that 5G technologies will not only have a profound impact on human health, but on the health of all living organisms it touches, including plants, as we shall see.

Equally disturbing, 5G technology puts environmental health at risk in a number of ways. First, MMWs may pose a serious threat to plant health. This 2010 study showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings exposed to RFR exhibited symptoms of necrosis, while another Armenian study suggested low-intensity MMW’s cause “peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes”–basically a stress response that damages cells–in wheat shoots. Plant irradiation is bad news for the planet’s flora, but it’s bad news for us, too: it could contaminate our food supply.

5G will potentially threaten natural ecosystems. According to several reports over the last two decades–some of which are summarized here–low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects bird and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death. And bee populations suffer from reduced egg-laying abilities of queen bees and smaller colony sizes. More evidence of ecosystem disruption comes from this 2012 meta-study, which indicates that 593 of 919 research studies suggest that RFR adversely affects plants, animals and humans.

It bears repeating: 5G is bad news for all living creatures and the planet we share.

Stop Killing Yourselves

The following video puts a bit more emphasis on the seriousness of this silent weapon:

Beware the propaganda deluge

Despite being fully aware of all these unsettling results, threats and concerns, the US corporatocracy continues to maintain a gung-ho attitude about 5G. The Mobile Now Act was passed in 2016, and many US states have since gone ahead with 5G plans. The telecom industry’s biggest players have basically co-opted government powers to enforce their 5G agenda, with companies like AT&T and Qualcomm having begun live testing. And despite research showing serious threats to humans and the planet, the FCC Chairman announced intentions to open low-, mid- and high-frequency spectrums, without even mentioning a single word about the dangers.

They’re going to sell this to us as ‘faster browsing speeds’ – but the truth is, you’ll barely even notice the difference. They’re going to call anyone who protests against 5G a ‘Luddite’ or ‘technophobe’. But why such a willingness to embrace another new technology   – even though it carries serious risks and brings spurious benefits? Why not heed the lessons learned from killer products like asbestos, tobacco and leaded gasoline?

Because a tiny percentage of people will gain an awful lot of money, is one reason. And because companies and governments will be given unprecedented amounts of power over civilians is the other.

All isn’t doom and gloom, though. At least one US politician is maintaining some level-headedness: in October, California Governor Jerry Brown stopped legislation that would have allowed the telecom industry to inundate the state with mini-towers. Brown’s bold actions have permitted localities a say in where and how many cell towers are placed.

The state of Hawaii has stopped 5G and smart meters by collectively threatening to charge every person who installed such meters with liability for any health problems residents may suffer. Moreover, 180 scientists have started a petition to warn of 5G potential health effects. Maybe these actions will afford more time for additional studies and data collection. Just as importantly, maybe they’ll cause other politicians and figureheads to reflect on what they’ve been pushing for.

Millimeter waves (from 10-mm|30GHz to 1-mm|300GHz) are readily absorbed by the atmosphere and by the eyes and skin of living organisms

In the first quarter of 2017, the US population was being irradiated primarily by the following pulsed microwaves:

  • 700 million to 2.1 billion microwaves per second for 2G/3G/4G mobile data sent to cell phones
  • 2.4 billion to 5.8 billion microwaves per second for Wi-Fi data to tablets/laptops

In the near future, if Verizon, AT&T and others wireless carriers have their way, the US population will be radiated with additional, pulsed microwaves (24 billion to 90 billion microwaves per second) for 5G services and for navigation-assisted cars.

As with any toxic agent, the proper way to evaluate its toxicity is to consider not just the rate of exposure (as the Federal RF/MW radiation guidelines do), but consider total exposure over time. Below is a graph of RF/MW radiation exposures from Wi-Fi of an elementary school student using a wireless iPad. One can see extremely high peaks of electrical power.  These peaks cannot be seen using SAR tests. 

The intense peaks of RF/MW radiation and total exposure over time (not the average rate of exposure), are what impacts health the most.

In May of 2016, scientists at the US Federal National Toxicology Program released “partial findings” from the $25 million study on cellphone radiation, that found that both hyperplasias (abnormal increases in volume of a tissue or organ caused by the formation and growth of new normal cells) and tumors occur at significantly higher rates in the presence of continuous RF/MW radiation,

Disregarding these findings, six short weeks later, the FCC approved a move to 5G, and the wireless industry got to work installing  Distributed Antenna Systems on utility poles as quickly as they possibly could.  Some antennas have been placed as close as 20 feet from second story bedroom windows and will spray 4G or 5G RF/MW radiation 24/7/365 into these bedrooms.. Cancer clusters have been documented for people living closer than 2,000 feet to mobile communications base stations,.Antennas for mobile communications base stations should never be lower than 200 feet, and never closer than 2,000 feet to people and other living organisms.

Massive electromagnetic pollution is spiraling out of control, with both Industry and Government denying the scientific proof of harm from RF/MW radiation. Our Government and the Wireless Industry should not transmit digital data wirelessly, using the data-dense modulation schemes: Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM/OFDMA) used in Wi-Fi, 4G/LTE and 5G — because the US Government has already proven that the data-sparse 2G modulation is hazardous. We must, instead, transmit data from Point A to Point B to every business, every home, every school and farm with far superior fiber optic cables.”(3)

Most 5G Studies Misleading

“5G will use pulsed millimeter waves to carry information. But as Dr. Joel Moskowitz points out, most 5G studies are misleading because they do not pulse the waves. This is important because research on microwaves already tells us how pulsed waves have more profound biological effects on our body compared to non-pulsed waves. Previous studies, for instance, show how pulse rates of the frequencies led to gene toxicity and DNA strand breaks.

Live Testing Already Begun

AT&T have announced the availability of their 5G Evolution in Austin, Texas. 5G Evolution allows Samsung S8 and S8 + users access to faster speeds. This is part of AT&T’s plan to lay the 5G foundation while the standards are being finalized. This is expected to happen in late 2018. AT&T has eyes on 19 other metropolitan areas such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, Atlanta, San Francisco and so on. Indianapolis is up next on their 5G trail due to arrive in the summer.

Charter, the second-largest cable operator in the US, has been approved for an experimental 28 GHz license in Los Angeles. The outdoor tests will use fixed transmitters with a 1 km or smaller effective radius.

Qualcomm has already demonstrated a 5G antenna system with about 27 decibel gain. According to ABI Research, is “about 10 to 12 more db than a typical cellular base station antenna.” Not a good sign.

Many more private sector companies such as HTC, Oracle, Sprint, T-Mobile are playing a role in the developing of testing platforms by contributing time, knowledge or money.

In the UK the 3.4GHz band has been earmarked for 5G use with contracts awarded to O2, Vodaphone, EE and Three. While the 2.3GHz band, awarded to O2, is likely to be used for 5G too in time.”(4)

Take a look at this short video on some of the negative health effects of cell phones and 5G:

Take action

“In the meantime, we as individuals must do everything we can to protect ourselves. Here’s what you can do:

  • Understand EMFs and their behaviors
  • Use EMF meters to measure, mark and avoid hotspots
  • Whenever possible, limit your exposure: use a headset or speaker mode while talking on a cellphone.
  • Refuse to use 5G phones and devices. Full stop. And discourage those you know from doing so.
  • Refuse to buy anything ‘smart’ – ‘smart’ appliances, ‘smart’ heaters, etc.
  • No matter what, do NOT get a smart meter – these put high levels of 5G radiation right in your home
  • Join the growing numbers of dissenters. Get active with them here.
  • Do as the Hawaiians have done and threaten smart meter and 5G tech installers with liability. You can learn how to do that here.
  • Spread the word! Share this article with everyone you know”(2) 

Some Final Thoughts:

Cites:

(1) What are 4G/5G?

(2) Frightening Frequencies: The Dangers of 5G & What You Can Do About Them

(3) Microwave Radiation Primer

(4) 5G Radiation Dangers – 11 Reasons To Be Concerned

Related Posts:

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying

Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols)

Dirty Electricity and the Diseases of Civilization

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

EMF Exposure and Potential Health Effects

EMF-Impact on Health

How To Search For Cell Tower And Antenna Locations

Low Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation: A New Oxidant For Living Cells

The Depopulation Agenda

The History And Dangers Of Microwave Technology

The Microwave Control Grid

Vaccines

What Chemtrails Are Doing To Your Brain

 

 

EMF Exposure and Potential Health Effects

“In today’s world, everyone is exposed to two types of EMFs: (1) extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF) from electrical and electronic appliances and power lines and (2) radiofrequency radiation (RF) from wireless devices such as cell phones and cordless phones, cellular antennas and towers, and broadcast transmission towers.  In this report we will use the  term EMFs when referring to all electromagnetic fields in general; and the terms ELF and RF when referring to the specific type of exposure.  They are both types of non-ionizing radiation, which means that they do not have sufficient energy to break off electrons from their orbits around atoms and ionize (charge) the atoms, as do x-rays, CT scans, and other forms of ionizing  radiation.

“Main Reasons for Disagreement among Experts: There may be no lower limit at which exposures do not affect us.  Until we know if there is a lower limit below which bioeffects and adverse health impacts do not occur, it is unwise from a public health perspective to continue “business-as-usual” deploying new technologies that increase ELF and RF exposures, particularly involuntary exposures.

1) Scientists and public health policy experts use very different definitions of the standard of evidence used to judge the science, so they come to different conclusions about what to do.  Scientists do have a role, but it is not exclusive and other opinions matter.
2) We are all talking about essentially the same scientific studies, but use a different way of measuring when “enough is enough” or “proof exists”.
3) Some experts keep saying that all studies have to be consistent (turn out the same way every time) before they are comfortable saying an effect exists.  
4) Some experts think that it is enough to look only at short-term, acute effects.
5) Other experts say that it is imperative we have studies over longer time (showing the effects of chronic exposures) since that is what kind of world we live in.
6) Some experts say that everyone, including the very young, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with illnesses have to be considered –others say only the average person (or in the case of RF, a six-foot tall man) matter.
7) There is no unexposed population, making it harder to see increased risk of diseases.
8) The lack of consensus about a single biological mechanism of action.
9) The strength of human epidemiological studies reporting risks from ELF and RF exposures, but animal studies don’t show a strong toxic effect.  
10) Vested interests have a substantial influence on the health debate.

“Today’s public exposure limits for telecommunications are based on the presumption that heating of tissue (for RF)  or induced electric currents in the body (for ELF) are the only concerns when living organisms are exposed to RF.

“In the last few decades, it has been established beyond any reasonable doubt that bioeffects and some adverse health effects occur at far lower levels of RF and ELF exposure where no heating (or induced currents) occurs at all; some effects are shown to occur at several hundred thousand times below the existing public safety limits where heating is an impossibility.

“It appears it is the INFORMATION conveyed by electromagnetic radiation (rather than heat) that causes biological changes – some of these biological changes may lead to loss of wellbeing, disease and even death.

“Effects occur at non-thermal or low-intensity exposure levels thousands of times below the levels that federal agencies say should keep the public safe. For many new devices operating with wireless technologies, the devices are exempt from any regulatory standards. The existing standards have been proven to be inadequate to control against harm from low-intensity, chronic exposures, based on any reasonable, independent assessment of the scientific literature. It means that an entirely new basis (a biological basis) for new exposure standards is needed.  New standards need to take into account what we have learned about the effects of ELF and RF (all non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and to design new limits based on biologically demonstrated effects that are important to proper biological function in living organisms.   It is vital to do so because the explosion of new sources has created unprecedented levels of artificial electromagnetic fields that now cover all but remote areas of the habitable space on earth.  Mid-course corrections are needed in the way we accept, test and deploy  new technologies that expose us to ELF and RF in order to avert public health problems of a global nature.

“There may be no lower limit at which exposures do not affect us.  Until we know if there is a lower limit below which bioeffects and adverse health impacts do not occur, it is unwise from a public health perspective to continue “business-as- usual” deploying new technologies that increase ELF and RF exposures, particularly involuntary exposures.

Childhood Leukemia and Other Childhood Cancers

“The evidence that power lines and other sources of ELF are consistently associated with higher rates of childhood leukemia has resulted in the International Agency for Cancer Research (an arm of the World Health Organization) to classify ELF as a Possible Human Carcinogen (in the Group 2B carcinogen list).  Leukemia is the most common type of cancer in children.

“There is little doubt that exposure to ELF causes childhood leukemia.

“The exposure levels for increased risk are quite low –just above background or ambient levels and much lower than current exposure limits.

“There is some evidence that other childhood cancers may be related to ELF exposure but not enough studies have been done.

Brain Tumors and Acoustic Neuromas

“Radiofrequency radiation from cell phone and cordless phone exposure has been linked in more  than one dozen studies to increased risk for brain tumors and/or acoustic neuromas (a tumor in the brain on a nerve related to our hearing).

“People who have used a cell phonefor ten years or more have higher rates of malignant brain tumor and acoustic neuromas.   It is worse if the cell phone has been used primarily on one side of the head.

“For brain tumors, people who have used a cell phone for 10 years or longer have a 20% increase in risk (when the cell phone is used on both sides of the head).  For people who have used a cell phone for 10 years or longer predominantly on one side of the head, there is a 200% increased risk of a brain tumor.  This information relies on the combined results of many brain tumor/cell phone studies taken together (a meta-analysis of studies).

“People who have used a cordless phone for ten years or more have higher rates of malignant brain tumor and acoustic neuromas. It is worse if the cordless phone has been used primarily on one side of the head.

“The risk of brain tumor (high-grade malignant glioma) from cordless phone use is 220% higher (both sides of the head).  The risk from use of a cordless phone is 470% higher when used mostly on only one side of the head.

“For acoustic neuromas, there is a 30% increased risk with cell phone use at ten years and longer; and a 240% increased risk of acoustic neuroma when the cell phone is used mainly on one side of the head.  These risks are based on the combined results of several studies (a meta-analysis of studies).
 
“For use of cordless phones, the increased risk of acoustic neuroma is three-fold higher (310%) when the phone is mainly used on one side of the head.

“The current standard for exposure to the emissions of cell phones and cordless phones is not safe considering studies reporting long-term brain tumor and acoustic neuroma risks.

Other Adult Cancers

“There are multiple studies that show statistically significant relationships between occupational exposure and leukemia in adults (see Chapter 11), in spite of major limitations in the exposure assessment.

“The evidence for a relationship between exposure and breast cancer is relatively strong in men (Erren, 2001), and some (by no means all) studies show female breast cancer also to be elevated with increased exposure (see Chapter 12).  Brain tumors and acoustic neuromas are more common in exposed persons (see Chapter 10).  There is less published evidence on other cancers, but Charles et al. (2003) report that workers in the highest 10% category for EMF exposure were twice as likely to die of prostate cancer as those exposed at lower levels.

“In total the scientific evidence for adult disease associated with EMF exposure is sufficiently strong for adult cancers that preventive steps are appropriate, even if not all reports have shown exactly the same positive relationship.  This is especially true since many factors reduce our ability to see disease patterns that might be related to EMF exposure: there is no unexposed population for comparison, for example, and other difficulties in exposure assessment, The evidence for a relationship between EMF exposure and adult cancers and neurodegenerative diseases is sufficiently strong at present to merit preventive actions to reduce EMF exposure.

Breast Cancer

“There is rather strong evidence from multiple areas of scientific investigation that ELF is related to breast cancer.  Over the last two decades there have been numerous epidemiological studies (studies of human illness) on breast cancer in both men and women, although this relationship remains controversial among scientists.  Many of these studies report that ELF exposures are related to increased risk of breast cancer (not all studies report such effects, but then, we do not expect 100% or even 50% consistency in results in science, and do not require it to take reasonable preventative action).

“The evidence from studies on women in the workplace rather strongly suggests that ELF is a risk factor for breast cancer for women with long-term exposures of 10 mG and higher.

“Breast cancer studies of people who work in relatively high ELF exposures (10 mG and above) show higher rates of this disease.  Most studies of workers who are exposed to ELF have defined high exposure levels to be somewhere between 2 mG and 10 mG; however this kind of mixing of relatively low to relatively high ELF exposure just acts to
dilute out real risk levels.  Many of the occupational studies group exposures so that the highest group is exposed to 4 mG and above.  What this means is that a) few people are exposed to much higher levels and b) illness patterns show up at relatively low ELF levels of 4 mG and above.  This is another way of demonstrating that existing ELF limits that are set at 933-1000 mG are irrelevant to the exposure levels reporting increased risks.

“Laboratory studies that examine human breast cancer cells have shown that ELF exposure between 6 mG and 12 mG can interfere with protective effects of melatonin that fights the growth of these breast cancer cells.  For a decade, there has been evidence that human breast cancer cells grow faster if exposed to ELF at low environmental levels.  This is thought to be because ELF exposure can reduce melatonin levels in the body.   The presence of melatonin in breast cancer cell cultures is known to reduce the growth of cancer cells.  The absence of melatonin (because of ELF exposure or other reasons) is known to result in more cancer cell growth.

“Given the very high lifetime risks for developing breast cancer, and the critical importance of prevention; ELF exposures should be reduced for all people who are in high ELF environments for prolonged periods of time.

“Reducing ELF exposure is particularly important for people who have breast cancer.  The recovery environment should have low ELF levels given the evidence for poorer survival rates for childhood leukemia patients in ELF fields over 2 mG or 3 mG.  Preventative action for those who may be at higher risk for breast cancer is also warranted (particularly for those taking tamoxifen as a way to reduce the risk of getting breast cancer, since in addition to reducing the effectiveness of melatonin, ELF exposure may also reduce the effectiveness of tamoxifen at these same low exposure levels).  There is no excuse for ignoring the substantial body of evidence we already have that supports an association between breast cancer and ELF exposure; waiting for conclusive evidence is untenable given the enormous costs and societal and personal burdens caused by this disease.

“These are just some of the cancer issues to discuss.  It may be reasonable now to make the assumption that all cancers, and other disease endpoints might be related to, or worsened by exposures to EMFs (both ELF and RF).

Changes in the Nervous System and Brain Function

“Exposure to electromagnetic fields has been studies in connection with Alzheimer’s disease, motor neuron disease and Parkinson’s disease. (4)  These diseases all involve the death of specific neurons and may be classified as neurodegenerative diseases. There is evidence that high levels of amyloid beta are a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, and exposure to ELF can increase this substance in the brain.  There is considerable evidence that melatonin can protect the brain against damage leading to Alzheimer’s disease, and also strong evidence that exposure to ELF can reduce melatonin levels.  Thus it is hypothesized that one of the body’s main protections against developing Alzheimer’s disease (melatonin) is less available to the body when people are exposed to ELF. Prolonged exposure to ELF fields could alter calcium (Ca2+) levels in neurons and induce oxidative stress (4).   It is also possible that prolonged exposure to ELF fields may stimulate neurons (particularly large motor neurons) into synchronous firing, leading to damage by the buildup of toxins.

“Evidence for a relationship between exposure and the neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is strong and relatively consistent.

“Alzheimer’s disease is a disease of the nervous system.  There is strong evidence that long-term exposure to ELF is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease.

“Laboratory studies show that the nervous system of both humans and animals is sensitive to ELF and RF.  Measurable changes in brain function and behavior occur at levels associated with new technologies including cell phone use. Exposing humans to cell phone radiation can change brainwave activity at levels as low as 0.1 watt per kilogram SAR (W/Kg)*** in comparison to the US allowable level of 1.6 W/Kg and the International Commission for Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) allowable level of 2.0 W/Kg.  It can affect memory and learning.  It can affect normal brainwave activity.  ELF and RF exposures at low levels are able to change behavior in animals.

“There is little doubt that electromagnetic fields emitted by cell phones and cell phone use affect electrical activity of the brain.

“Changes in the way in which the brain and nervous system react depend very much on the specific exposures. Most studies only look at short-term effects, so the long-term consequences of exposures are not known.

“There is large variability in the results of ELF and RF testing, which would be expected based on the large variability of factors that can influence test results.  However, it is clearly demonstrated that under some conditions of exposure, the brain and nervous system functions of humans are altered.  The consequence of long-term or prolonged exposures have not been thoroughly studied in either adults or in children.

“The consequence of prolonged exposures to children, whose nervous systems continue to develop until late adolescence, is unknown at this time.  This could have serious implications to adult health and functioning in society if years of exposure of the young to both ELF and RF result in diminished capacity for thinking, judgment, memory, learning, and control over behavior.

“People who are chronically exposed to low-level wireless antenna emissions report symptoms such as problems in sleeping (insomnia), fatigue, headache, dizziness, grogginess, lack of concentration, memory problems, ringing in the ears (tinnitus), problems with balance and orientation, and difficulty in multi-tasking.  In children, exposures to cell phone radiation have resulted in changes in brain oscillatory activity during some memory tasks.  Although scientific studies as yet have not been able to confirm a cause-and-effect relationship; these complaints are widespread and the cause of significant public concern in some countries where wireless technologies are fairly mature and widely distributed (Sweden, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Greece, Israel). For example, the roll-out of the 3rd Generation wireless phones (and related community-wide antenna RF emissions in the Netherlands) caused almost immediate public complaints of illness.

“Conflicting results from those few studies that have been conducted may be based on the difficulty in providing non-exposed environments for testing to compare to environments that are intentionally exposed.  People traveling to laboratories for testing are pre-exposed to a multitude of RF and ELF exposures, so they may already be symptomatic prior to actual testing.  Also complicating this is good evidence that RF exposures testing behavioral changes show delayed results; effects are observed after termination of RF exposure.  This suggests a persistent change in the nervous system that may be evident only after time has passed, so is not observed during a short testing period.

Effects on Genes (DNA)

“The European research program (REFLEX) documented many changes in normal biological functioning in tests on DNA. The significance of these results is that such effects are directly related to the question of whether human health risks might occur, when these changes in genes and DNA happen. This large research effort produced information on EMFs effects from more than a dozen different researchers.

“Both ELF and RF exposures can be considered genotoxic (will damage DNA) under certain conditions of exposure, including exposure levels that are lower than existing safety limits.

Effects on Stress Proteins (Heat Shock Proteins)

“Very low-level ELF and RF exposures can cause cells to produce stress proteins, meaning that the cell recognizes ELF and RF exposures as harmful.  This is another important way in which scientists have documented that ELF and RF exposures can be harmful, and it happens at levels far below the existing public safety standards.

“An additional concern is that if the stress goes on too long, the protective effect is diminished. There is a reduced response if the stress goes on too long, and the protective effect is reduced. This means the cell is less protected against damage, and it is why prolonged or chronic exposures may be quite harmful, even at very low intensities.

Effects on the Immune System

“There is substantial evidence that ELF and RF can cause inflammatory reactions, allergy reactions and change normal immune function at levels allowed by current public safety standards.

“The body’s immune defense system senses danger from ELF and RF exposures, and targets an immune defense against these fields, much like the body’s reaction in producing stress proteins. These are additional indicators that very low intensity ELF and RF exposures are a) recognized by cells and b) can cause reactions as if the exposure is harmful.  Chronic exposure to factors that increase allergic and inflammatory responses on a continuing basis are likely to be harmful to health.  Chronic inflammatory responses can lead to cellular, tissue and organ damage over time. Many chronic diseases are thought to be related to chronic problems with immune system function.

“There is very clear evidence that exposures to ELF and RF at levels associated with cell phone use, computers, video display terminals, televisions, and other sources can cause these skin reactions.  Changes in skin sensitivity have been measured by skin biopsy, and the findings are remarkable.  Some of these reactions happen at levels equivalent to those of wireless technologies in daily life. Mast cells are also found in the brain and heart, perhaps targets of immune response by cells responding to ELF and RF exposures, and this might account for some of the other symptoms commonly reported (headache, sensitivity to light, heart arrhythmias and other cardiac symptoms).  Chronic provocation byexposure to ELF and RF can lead to immune dysfunction, chronic allergic responses, inflammatory diseases and ill health if they occur on a continuing basis over time.

Plausible Biological Mechanisms

“Plausible biological mechanisms are already identified that can reasonably account for most biological effects reported for exposure to RF and ELF at low-intensity levels (oxidative stress and DNA damage from free radicals leading to genotoxicity; molecular mechanisms at very low energies are plausible links to disease, e.g., effect on electron transfer rates linked to oxidative damage, DNA activation linked to abnormal biosynthesis and mutation).    It is also important to remember that traditional public health and epidemiological determinations do not require a proven mechanism  before inferring a causal link between EMFs exposure and disease.

“Oxidative stress through the action of free radical damage to DNA is a plausible biological mechanism for cancer and diseases that involve damage from ELF to the central nervous system.

Cite:
(1) http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec01_2007_summary_for_public.pdf

The complete BioInitiative Report:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/

Dirty Electricity and the Diseases of Civilization

 Another deliberately hidden critical facet of the damage inflicted by non-native electromagnetic energy on the human body is the effect of Dirty Electricity.

“Electric and magnetic fields, or EMF, are emitted from electrical devices or anything that uses electricity. Earth currents are low electrical currents found in soil. Natural activity deep within the earth causes some of these currents along with above ground electrical energy to produce low magnitude electrical currents. Transients and high frequency noise or signals come from the wiring of buildings, and from the use of common electrical devices found in homes and offices. The noise is created when electrical current is transmitted and interrupted.

“In these characterizations of electrical pollution, high frequency signals pollute regular electrical currents traveling in wires and currents through the earth. To better understand the background for the causes of electrical pollution, it is helpful to learn the basics of how the electrical current works.

“Regular “clean” power enters homes, buildings, and offices at 60 Hz. The increased use of electrical power overloads electrical grid base, which distributes the power. Power is “dirty” or polluted when it contains the high frequency signals flowing through overloaded wires, and not just clean 60 Hz power.

“The pollution of electricity is often compared to how water is polluted. At the source, water is clean. It is what comes with the water and pollutants along its path to the recipient that makes the water harmful to humans. However, like water pollution in many ways, electrical pollution is complex and often difficult to understand for the common consumer. The causes are varied and sometimes cannot be identified with certainty. However, the bulk of overloaded electricity bases can be attributed to the reliance on electrical appliances in today’s environment.

“In the 1950’s, the National Electrical Safety Code required a neutral wire to return wire to utilities. In this code it was forbidden to use the earth as a neutral return. This was a worsening problem in rural, farm areas where the currents were being returned to the soil affecting the feeding of animals. Later, the Public Service Commission allowed utilities to use grounding rods to serve as neutral wires for return. This was done instead of increasing the size of the neutral rods. Installing ground rods is a less costly solution than making the neutral rods larger in size. The grounding rods serve as an alternate and additional pathway for the energy to return to the substation instead of to the earth.

“Those concerned about electrical pollution say the size of neutral wires to make sure energy is returned to its source needs to be much larger. The current regulated size of the neutrals is not large enough to handle the load due to the greater use of electricity. The currents that are not properly directed are emitted into the environment or into homes or offices where electrical devices are widely relied upon by consumers. Neutral wires are not often sized for the modern electrical load. Power that is misdirected into the earth or home environments contains a much higher frequency that the 60 Hz classification making it “dirty” or unclean.

“Dr. Robert O. Becker, author of Cross Currents and the Body Electric stated that “I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time that the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields. I consider that to be far greater on a global scale that warming”.

“The high frequency currents most commonly created by computers and other electronic devices are circulated by various wires and systems, emitting the high frequency currents into home or office environments. Many cases have been documented where decreasing the amount of “dirty” electricity has lessened the effects of health problems and complications. Some of those health problems being attributed to electrical pollution include fibromyalgia, attention deficit disorder, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, diabetes, and asthma. There are also cases that detail that electrical pollution aggravates other preexisting conditions like multiple sclerosis and migraine headaches.(2)

“The diseases of civilization or lifestyle diseases include cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes and are thought to be caused by changes in diet, exercise habits, and lifestyle which occur as countries industrialize. I think that the critical variable which causes the radical changes in mortality accompanying industrialization is electrification. Beginning in 1979, with the work of Wertheimer and Leeper, there has been increasing evidence that some facet of electromagnetic field exposure is associated epidemiologically with an increased incidence of leukemia, certain other cancers and non-cancers like Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and suicide. With the exception of a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum from infra red through visible light, ultraviolet light and cosmic rays, the rest of the spectrum is man-made and foreign to human evolutionary experience. I suggest that from the time that Thomas Edison started his direct current electrical distribution system in the 1880s in New York City until now, when most of the world is electrified, the electricity carried high frequency voltage transients which caused and continue to cause what are considered to be the normal diseases of civilization. Even today, many of these diseases are absent or have very low incidence in places without electricity.

“When Edison and Tesla opened the Pandora’s box of electrification in the 1880s, the US vital registration system was primitive at best, and infectious disease death rates were falling rapidly. City residents had higher mortality rates and shorter life expectancy than rural residents. Rural white males in 1900 had an expectation of life at birth of over 10 years longer than urban residents.

“Although the authors of the 1930 US vital statistics report noted a 58.2% cancer mortality excess in urban areas, it raised no red flags. The census bureau residential electrification data was obviously not linked to the mortality data. Epidemiologists in that era were still concerned with the communicable diseases. Court Brown and Doll reported the appearance of the child- hood leukemia age peak in 1961, forty years after the US vital statistics mortality data on which it was based was available. I reported a cluster of childhood leukemia a decade after it occurred, only because I looked for it. Real time or periodic analysis of national or regional vital statistics data is still only rarely done in the US.

“The real surprise in this data set is that cardiovascular disease, diabetes and suicide, as well as cancer seem to be strongly related to level of residential electrification. A community-based epidemiologic study of urban rural differences in coronary heart disease and its risk factors was carried out in the mid 1980s in New Delhi, India and in a rural area 50 km away. The prevalence of coronary heart disease was three times higher in the urban residents, despite the fact that the rural residents smoked more and had higher total caloric and saturated fat intakes. Most cardiovascular disease risk factors were two to three times more common in the urban residents. Rural electrification projects are still being carried out in parts of the rural area which was studied.

“It seems unbelievable that mortality differences of this magnitude could go unexplained for over 70 years after they were first reported and 40 years after they were noticed. I think that in the early part of the 20th century nobody was looking for answers. By the time EMF epidemiology got started in 1979 the entire population was exposed to EMFs. Cohort studies were therefore using EMF-exposed population statistics to compute expected values, and case-control studies were comparing more exposed cases to less exposed controls. The mortality from lung cancer in two pack a day smokers is over 20 times that of non-smokers but only three times that of one pack a day smokers. After 1956, the EMF equivalent of a non-smoker ceased to exist in the US. An exception to this is the Amish who live without electricity. Like rural US residents in the 1940s, Amish males in the 1970s had very low cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality rates.

“If this hypothesis and findings outlined here are even partially true, the explosive recent increase in radiofrequency radiation, and high frequency voltage transients sources, especially in urban areas from cell phones and towers, terrestrial antennas, wi-fi and wi-max systems, broadband internet over power lines, and personal electronic equipment, suggests that like the 20th century EMF epidemic, we may already have a 21st century epidemic of morbidity and mortality underway caused by electromagnetic fields. The good news is that many of these diseases may be preventable by environmental manipulation, if society chooses to.(1)

 
 

How To Search For Cell Tower And Antenna Locations

 

http://www.antennasearch.com/

The link above is to the Antenna Search site, which can be used determine the locations of cell towers and antennas that are operating around a specific location.

Get detailed information on more than 1.9 million towers and antennas in the U.S.

Includes Google maps, ownership details and contact information.

Pinpoint existing towers, future towers and even small hidden antennas.

Get detailed information on:

Existing Towers: Registered and Non-Registered structures where antennas are placed. Towers may be used for various services including Cellular, Paging, Microwave and others.

Future Towers: Newly filed (or pending) applications to construct new towers. Application info includes location coordinates and detailed ownership data.

Antennas: The actual emitters of radio signals. Antennas can be placed on towers (multiple) or can be installed stand alone on top of existing buildings. Stand alone antennas are small (well below 200 ft). You may also check multiple antennas to determine which cell phone carriers are located on a particular tower.

– Quick Statistics (as of Sunday 3/13/2016 Weekly Update) –

Total(US)                     Top State

Towers 599,462             Texas (58,648)
Antennas 1,818,436           California (134,144)

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

The following information was shared at a symposia of the International Society for Bioelectricity and was presented 24 years ago in 1992. The theme topics for the Symposia were cancer, neural function, cell signaling, pineal gland function, and immune system interactions

“If one used electromagnetic energy sensors to view the world…..100 years ago, the world would have looked quite dim. Now the world glows with electromagnetic (em) energy emissions at most frequencies of the non-ionizing portion of the spectrum, such as power line fields, radio waves, microwaves, etc.

Living organisms are complex electrochemical systems that up until very recently have interacted with a relatively simple and weak magnetic field and few EMF energy emitters.

“A wide range of living organisms, including humans, [utilize EMF] energy to regulate various critical cellular systems; we see this in the complex of circadian rhythms.

“Thus, it is not surprising that the massive introduction of electromagnetic fields in an enormous range of new frequencies, modulations, and intensities in recent years has affected living organisms. In fact, it would be incredible and beyond belief if these electromagnetic fields did not affect the electrochemical systems we call living organisms.

“Much of the literature on electromagnetic field interactions published before the middle 1980s is irrelevant to biologists. Most of it was generated by the engineering community’s attempt to find out if their high-power equipment creates a hazard. Thus, little attention was paid to the variables that are important in biology. Instead, efforts were wasted in fruitless controversies such as whether the effects seen were thermal or non-thermal.

“In recent years, though, the convergence of a number of lines of research has led a diversity of biologists to carry out experiments using low-intensity electromagnetic fields to study the function of living cells and systems.

“The toxicology model used by investigators in earlier years was not the appropriate model on which to design experiments. It was assumed that electromagnetic fields are a foreign substance to living organisms, like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances in a toxicology model, the greater the dose, the greater the effect-a dose-response relationship. Thus, experiments tended to be designed with high doses and with little regard for other parameters such as modulation and frequency. This is one reason why those earlier studies yielded so little useful information.

“As noted [above], electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance. Living organisms are electrochemical systems that use emfs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. A more appropriate model of how living organisms can be expected to respond to em fields would be to compare them to a radio receiver.

“An electromagnetic signal a radio detects (let us call it signal x) and transduces into the sound of music is almost un-measurably weak. Yet the radio is immersed in a sea of em signals from power lines, radio stations, TV stations, radars, etc. The radio doesn’t notice the sea of signals because they are not the appropriate frequency or modulation. Thus, they don’t disturb the music we hear. If we expose the radio to an appropriately tuned em signal or harmonic, however, even if it is very weak compared to signal x, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if we expose a living system to a very weak em signal, if the signal is appropriately “tuned,” it could facilitate or interfere with normal function. This is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicology model. And this is the model that is now starting to be used so fruitfully.”(1)

And yes, more researchers understand this and realize the need to use this approach in their experiments, but funding for research has been and is currently limited, as is any motivation by the controlled media to expose the results of those studies that have been done.

And currently there are nearly as many cell phones as there are people.

That’s a lot of lab rats…….

 
 

Low Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation: A New Oxidant For Living Cells

There exist a great number of studies showing the negative effects of non-native EMF. As usual, the cell phone industry has led the way in burying this evidence under fallacious claims of safety and labeling whistle-blowers and truth-tellers as wackos.

Just standard operating procedure to keep the cash flow uninterrupted.

Where have we seen this before?

“Radiofrequency radiation (RFR), e.g. electromagnetic waves emitted by our cell phones and Wi-Fi, are referred to as non-ionizing. This means that in contrast to the ionizing radiation, which does induce  ionization of water and biologically  important macromolecules, RFR does not have a capacity for such effects. Unlike, for example X-rays, the energy of RFR is not enough to break electrons off the molecules. However, is RFR completely safe for public health? Traditionally, the industry and the public bodies said yes. Nevertheless, new research data change this perception.

“Oxidative stress is an induced imbalance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant systems resulting in oxidative damage  to  proteins, lipids and DNA; and is closely connected to overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells. The  notion that the low intensity RFR can bring about significant oxidative stress in living cells has been doubted for years. The logic is simple: as low intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic waves are not able to ionize molecules, they can do nothing   wrong for the living tissues. However, during the last decades a worldwide increase in penetration of wireless communication systems, including cellular telephony and Wi-Fi, attracted massive attention to possible biological effects of low intensity RFR. Consequently, the recent epidemiological studies unexpectedly indicated a significant increase in the occurrence of various  tumors among longterm and “heavy” users of cellular phones. These include brain tumors, acoustic neuromas, tumors of parotid  glands, seminomas, melanomas and lymphomas. Similarly, an increase in tumor incidence  among  people  living nearby cellular base transmitting stations was also reported. As a result, in 2011 the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radiofrequency radiation as a possible carcinogen to humans.

“To that, a new medical condition, so-called electro-hypersensitivity, in which subjects suffer due to RFR exposure has been described. Typically these people suffer from skin and mucosa related symptoms (itching, smarting, pain, heat sensation), or heart and nervous system disorders after exposure to computer monitors, cell phones and other electromagnetic devices. This malady is growing continuously: starting from 0.06% of the total population in 1985 this category now includes as much as 9-11% of the European population.

“A number of experimental studies demonstrate metabolic effects induced by low intensity RFR. Notwithstanding the non-ionizing nature of RFR, profound mutagenic effects and features of significant oxidative stress in living cells under low
intensity RFR exposure were detected using various biological models. Some of the papers however still show an absence of  biological effects. To clarify the picture, we analyzed peer-reviewed publications on oxidative effects of RFR and found
altogether 80 currently available papers, of which a remarkable part, 76 papers (92.5%), reported the detection of significant oxidative stress. These effects most often included overproduction of ROS, lipid peroxidation/increased concentrations of malondialde-hyde, protein peroxidation, increased concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and changes in the   activity of antioxidant enzymes. Some papers point to the role of particular ROS and the ROS related pathways.

“Whatever the particular first-step molecular mechanisms, it is clear that the substantial overproduction of ROS in living cells under low intensity RFR exposure could cause a broad spectrum of health disorders and diseases, including cancer in humans. Undoubtedly, this calls for the further intensive research in the area, as well as to a precautionary approach in routine usage of wireless devices.”(1)

Cite:
(1) http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=154583

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, An Introduction Programming Manual was uncovered quite by accident on July 7, 1986 when an employee of Boeing Aircraft Co. purchased a surplus IBM copier for scrap parts at a sale, and discovered inside details of a plan, hatched in the embryonic days of the “Cold War” which called for control of the masses through manipulation of industry, peoples’ pastimes, education and political leanings. It called for a quiet revolution, putting brother against brother,
and diverting the public’s attention from what is really going on.

Some quotes from the text:

“It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide. This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power and without full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodologies for economic conquest – it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons and the public.

“You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at human society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without the loss of discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do not deviate from them.

“In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it was only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public would be able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new silent weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they were for providing a private utopia.

“All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?

“Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war
against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few. In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class
of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name “silent weapons”.”(1)

Short video by Deborah Taveres on the Silent Weapons System:

A reading of the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:

Cite-(Read More)

(1)A link to the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars