Tag Archives: EMF

5G Is the Kill Shot

5G, 5G, 5G……It’s supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread.

Take a look at this short video below, which presents:

IEEE Propaganda: Everything You Need to Know About 5G

A key quote from the video above is “but what exactly is a 5G network? The truth is that experts can’t tell us what 5G actually is because they don’t even know yet . . .”

“So, why is the FCC voting on regulations with NO CONGRESSIONAL MANDATE for a yet-to-be-defined technology?

Never underestimate the lobbying power of BIG TELECOM MONEY in Washington, DC or in our State Capitols, to execute the Republican/ALEC agenda in an era when MONEY = FREE SPEECH. We are witnessing a disaster that rapes and pillages the public interest to further enrich our already-obscenely-profitable and monopoly-power-drunk Telecom firms which are grabbing for all they can get during this short-lived Trump administration.”(1)

“Since much of the US population is unwisely bathing itself 24/7/365 in data-carrying, pulsed, Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation), it is important to understand what we are actually doing to ourselves, our loved ones and our environment. Duration of exposure to these micro-second pulses of electrical power, not intensity, is the most important factor.

Therefore, always-on wireless infrastructure antennas are hazardous to one’s health — that is why wireless telecommunications base station antennas belong 200 feet off the ground and at least 2,500 feet away from homes, schools, hospitals, public buildings, parks and wilderness areas. That is why installation of so-called “Small Cell” Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) anywhere near second-story bedroom windows is a disaster — no matter what government guideline is quoted to justify this assault.

The common thread that ties of WiFi, 4G and 5G together is the reliance on OFDM/OFDMA modulation — sophisticated mathematical transformations that pack huge amounts of digital data onto carrier microwaves in order to transmit the data through the atmosphere. The pulsed microwaves either penetrate or reflect off of anything in their path: any flora, fauna and man-made structures you can imagine, including human adults and children, pets, and already threatened species of pollinators birds, bees and butterflies.

What is WiFi and why should you turn off your Wireless Router/Access Point?

Pulsed Microwave Radiation is the Foundation of Wireless Mobile Data. Microwave Radiation, when used to transfer data from Point-A to Point-B, is comprised of micro-second pulses of electrical power sprayed through the atmosphere. Microwaves either penetrate or reflect off of anything or anyone in their path, The data transferred are electrical pulses or ”bullets” traveling at the speed of light, about 670 million miles per hour. These pulses of data can cause biological harm to many living organisms, including humans.

How Do Microwaves Radiate Over Long Distances?

Electromagnetic waves are produced whenever charged particles are accelerated. In the near-field region (within 3-4 wavelengths from the source antenna charges), waves are incoherent, erratic and choppy with high micro-second peaks of Electric and Magnetic fields.  This creates a toxic “hell-stew” of powerful zaps, crackles and pops that are difficult to characterize with any degree of accuracy.  Unfortunately, this is the range where people typically hold their wireless devices. Whenever one sends/receives digital data wirelessly from their device, a toxic, spherical cloud 36″ to 48″ in diameter forms around the device, exposing everyone nearby to peaks of RF/MW radiation.

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is neither an accurate nor a scientific measure of the hazards created by this mixture of Electric and Magnetic fields in the near-field region. SAR is a misleading ‘average of an average’, designed to hide the peaks of Electric and Magnetic power that surround one’s device. These peaks of power interrupt the sensitive electrical signals of our body and causes DNA and neurological damage, suppress the immune system, and interrupt hormone production and regulation.

How Do Microwaves Send and Receive Digital Data?

A wavelength carries massive numbers of erratic pulses of digital data, that wirelessly transmit text, image, audio and video data to and from computers, tablets, phones and the (predicted) billions of IoT (Internet of Things) machines, appliances, “things,” sensors and devices. Unfortunately, the microwaves used for this purpose are not the smooth sine waves you may have learned about in text books that describe the transmission of visible light (430 to 770 THz) or Alternating Current electrical power (60 Hz).

Natural Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) come from two main sources: the sun, and thunderstorm activity, with the Earth’s Schumann Resonance centering around 7.83 Hz. Being Man-made, pulsed RF/MW radiation differs from natural EMF. Man-made Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF/EMF) and the resulting RF/MW radiation are defined by the equation: c = f λ, where c = the speed of light, f = the frequency, and λ = the wavelength. This means that since c is a constant, as frequency increases, wavelength decreases. Frequency is measured in a unit called Hertz, which represents the number of cycles or oscillations of a wave in one second. The unit Hertz is named after Heinrich Rudolph Hertz a German scientist who first demonstrated that electromagnetic waves radiate at a constant speed.

In order to transmit digital data, an antenna’s microchips distort the waves’ shape or pace to modulate (encode) the data stream onto the carrier waves at the source before the antenna transmits them. At the destination, other microchips demodulate (decode) the data stream so the destination device can display the text/image or play the audio/video. A modem is a device that literally modulates and demodulates data streams; engineers shortened the name to modem. Each antenna in this scheme is a two-way microwave transmitter/receiver.

There are an infinite number of combinations of wavelength, frequency, intensity and modulation, the mathematical transformations that encode data onto a carrier wave. Each combination is a new digital fingerprint that uniquely identifies a new man-made toxic agent that, when transmitted into the air, instantly fills our homes, schools, workplaces or public spaces.

Microwaves have different properties, depending on their wavelength. The longer waves (20″ down to 5″) travel further and penetrate deeper into buildings and living tissue. The shorter waves (0.5″ down to 0.1″) are called millimeter waves (mm-waves) because they measure from 10 mm (at 30,000 MHz = 30 GHz), down to 1 mm (at 300,000 MHz = 300 GHz). The mm-waves are not as efficient because they don’t travel as far, tend to reflect off of buildings, and deposit mainly into the eyes and skins of living organisms.”(3)

A key target for 5G frequency use is 60 GHz:

William Webb: The 5G Myth And why Consistent Connectivity is the Goal

Some have suggested that 5G will be whatever interesting developments happen from 2018 onwards. There is much political capital expended in claiming that 5G will be deployed early in a country. MNOs and Governments will simply claim from 2018 onwards that they have 5G even though all that has been deployed is evolved 4G. For all the debate, 5G could be a label, not a technology.

End users will be told that they now have 5G even though they have not changed their handsets nor received any improvements in service. Or alternatively, in the case where 5G is the label applied to the introduction of IoT, consumers may be told that 5G is not about their handset but about the ability to connect their devices. In the US, the term 5G might be applied to fixed wireless deployments, with “5G to the home:. Given the confusion around what 5G is, this second “label whatever we have as 5G: approach could be used in Europe and the US alongside the first “limited millimeter wave deployment” approach happening in Asia Pacific.

This is the chilling observation: these planning documents for the recently installed 4G Palo Alto Small cells, show that even though the RF/MW radiation calculations were made for 6 watts of input power, the actual input power for each small cell antenna is 300 to 500 Watts and the “associated equipment” power supply cabinet is 17.5 cubic feet — one for each antenna!

Similar documents for a 2017 Verizon 4G Small Cell deployment in Weston, MA state that each antenna outputs 1,257 Watts of Effective Radiated Power (ERP), a significant RF/MW radiation exposure. These military-grade RF/MW radiation exposures do not belong in residential zones not matter what over-the-rainbow promises are being made about 5G by those who wish to profit for 4G/5G Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) installations everywhere.

As SB.649 contains no language for real-time monitoring of the levels of RF/MW radiation and no warning or detection systems if the RF/MW radiation reaches hazardous levels, then the equipment is already in place to easily increase the power input from 6 watts to 500 watts, which constitutes a Microwave Radiation weapon on every block in downtown Palo Alto — not unlike weapons the Federal Government has already designed and deployed.

Here is an actual, already designed and deployed actual millimeter wave application . . .

Military Ray Gun: Active Denial System, an Electromagnetic Radiation Weapon:

The military exploits the fact that Radio-Frequency Microwave Radiation (RF/MW radiation) is biologicially active while the Wireless industry denies that RF/MW radiation is biologically active. Which one is lying?

  • 5G is a pipe-dream: it is not even close to being deployed at scale. The engineers understand this. 5G is the smoke screen/hype machine being used to sell this vision to the politicians.
  • This is actually a real-estate scheme: AT&T and Verizon want to invade neighborhoods and secure cut-rate, rent-controlled access to publicly-owned structures (utility poles, light poles, traffic lights, street signs) so they can expand their operations, at will, without regulation. AT&T and Verizon will install 4G/LTE today to make obscene profits now . . . and perhaps never upgrade it to 5G.

  • Have AT&T and Verizon behaved like this in the past? Sure. Read about their promises to upgrade the copper wireline networks with fiber-optic cables. After years of promises, and a fraudulent diversion of funds that they received to install the fiber-optic cables, they determined it would lower their costs and maximize their profits to use Wireless for broadband instead — even though Wireless broadband is hazardous, extremely energy-inefficient, much less secure and much less reliable than fiber-optic to the home.
  • The real goal is to secure a new source of revenue: cell phone subscriptions are a mature (but still very profitable business); now the Wireless companies want to steal market share from Comcast and other cable companies and charge for data by the gigabyte. How to best do this? Make timely donations to politicians’ local programs to get these politicians to do their bidding, like price-fixing the access price to publicly-owned property to install powerful two-way microwave transmitters 10-15 feet from second story windows in residential neighborhoods.”(1)

More bandwidth – more dangers of 5G

“Who doesn’t want faster, bigger (or smaller), more efficient? Take wireless mobile telecommunications. Our current broadband cellular network platform, 4G (or fourth generation), allows us to transmit data faster than 3G and everything that preceded. We can access information faster now than ever before in history. What more could we want? Oh, yes, transmission speeds powerful enough to accommodate the (rather horrifying) so-called  Internet of Things. Which brings us to 5G.

Until now, mobile broadband networks have been designed to meet the needs of people. But 5G has been created with machines’ needs in mind, offering low-latency, high-efficiency data transfer. It achieves this by breaking data down into smaller packages, allowing for faster transmission times. Whereas 4G has a fifty-millisecond delay, 5G data transfer will offer a mere one-millisecond delay–we humans won’t notice the difference, but it will permit machines to achieve near-seamless communication. Which in itself  may open a whole Pandora’s box of trouble for us – and our planet.

Let’s start with some basic background on 5G technology. Faster processing speeds require more bandwidth, yet our current frequency bandwidths are quickly becoming saturated. The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.

High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticeable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas much closer together, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighborhood.

Here are some numbers to put things into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radio-frequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.”(2)

Serious health concerns:

“Definition of Microwave Sickness:

Original Merriam-Webster® link here.

a condition of impaired health . . . that is characterized by headaches, anxiety, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and difficulty in concentrating and by changes in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems and that is held to be caused by prolonged exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation”(1)

“It’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen and specified that the use of mobile phones could lead to specific forms of brain tumors.

Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

  • DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
  • oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
  • disruption of cell metabolism
  • increased blood-brain barrier permeability
  • melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
  • disruption of brain glucose metabolism
  • generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)”(2)

And then there’s the negative effects on mitochondria in the cells:

“As mentioned, the new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners.

The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigors of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR flying around us. It’s no wonder that apprehension exists over potential risks, to both human and environmental health.

Perhaps the strongest concern involves adverse effects of MMWs on human skin. This letter to the Federal Communications Commission, from Dr Yael Stein of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, outlines the main points. Over ninety percent of microwave radiation is absorbed by the epidermis and dermis layers, so human skin basically acts as an absorbing sponge for microwave radiation. Disquieting as this may sound, it’s generally considered acceptable so long as the violating wavelengths are greater than the skin layer’s dimensions. But MMW’s violate this condition.

Furthermore, the sweat ducts in the skin’s upper layer act like helical antennas, which are specialized antennas constructed specifically to respond to electromagnetic fields. With millions of sweat ducts, and 5G’s increased RFR needs, it stands to reason that our bodies will become far more conductive to this radiation. The full ramifications of this fact are presently unclear, especially for more vulnerable members of the public (e.g., babies, pregnant women, the elderly), but this technology

Furthermore, MMWs may cause our pain receptors to flare up in recognition of the waves as damaging stimuli. Consider that the US Department of Defense already uses a crowd-dispersal method called the Active Denial System, in which MMWs are directed at crowds to make their skin feel like it’s burning, and also has the ability to basically microwave populations to death from afar with this technology if they choose to do so. And the telecommunications industry wants to fill our atmosphere with MMWs?

Animal research worldwide illustrates how microwave radiation in general and MMW’s in particular can damage the eyes and immune system, cell growth rate, even bacterial resistance. An experiment at the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University showed that 60GHz millimeter-wave antennas produce thermal injuries in rabbit eyes, with thermal effects reaching below the eye’s surface. This study, meanwhile, suggests low-level MMW’s caused lens opacity–a precursor to cataracts–in rats’ eyes. A Chinese study demonstrated that eight hours’ of microwave radiation damaged rabbits’ lens epithelial cells. A Pakistani study concluded that exposure to mobile phone EMF prevented chicken embryo retinal cells from properly differentiating.

This Russian study revealed that exposing healthy mice to low-intensity, extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation severely compromised their immune systems. And a 2016 Armenian study concluded that low-intensity MMW’s not only depressed the growth of E. coli and other bacteria, but also changed certain properties and activity levels of the cells. The same Armenian study noted that MMW interaction with bacteria could lead to antibiotic resistance–distressing news, considering immunity to bacteria is already compromised due to the overuse of antibiotics.

Again, if these findings translate to humans, our rampant cellphone use would likely cause profound, adverse health effects; an increase in MMW’s as more bandwidth is introduced could further complicate the matter. But what’s also important to note here is that 5G technologies will not only have a profound impact on human health, but on the health of all living organisms it touches, including plants, as we shall see.

Equally disturbing, 5G technology puts environmental health at risk in a number of ways. First, MMWs may pose a serious threat to plant health. This 2010 study showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings exposed to RFR exhibited symptoms of necrosis, while another Armenian study suggested low-intensity MMW’s cause “peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes”–basically a stress response that damages cells–in wheat shoots. Plant irradiation is bad news for the planet’s flora, but it’s bad news for us, too: it could contaminate our food supply.

5G will potentially threaten natural ecosystems. According to several reports over the last two decades–some of which are summarized here–low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects bird and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death. And bee populations suffer from reduced egg-laying abilities of queen bees and smaller colony sizes. More evidence of ecosystem disruption comes from this 2012 meta-study, which indicates that 593 of 919 research studies suggest that RFR adversely affects plants, animals and humans.

It bears repeating: 5G is bad news for all living creatures and the planet we share.

Stop Killing Yourselves

The following video puts a bit more emphasis on the seriousness of this silent weapon:

Beware the propaganda deluge

Despite being fully aware of all these unsettling results, threats and concerns, the US corporatocracy continues to maintain a gung-ho attitude about 5G. The Mobile Now Act was passed in 2016, and many US states have since gone ahead with 5G plans. The telecom industry’s biggest players have basically co-opted government powers to enforce their 5G agenda, with companies like AT&T and Qualcomm having begun live testing. And despite research showing serious threats to humans and the planet, the FCC Chairman announced intentions to open low-, mid- and high-frequency spectrums, without even mentioning a single word about the dangers.

They’re going to sell this to us as ‘faster browsing speeds’ – but the truth is, you’ll barely even notice the difference. They’re going to call anyone who protests against 5G a ‘Luddite’ or ‘technophobe’. But why such a willingness to embrace another new technology   – even though it carries serious risks and brings spurious benefits? Why not heed the lessons learned from killer products like asbestos, tobacco and leaded gasoline?

Because a tiny percentage of people will gain an awful lot of money, is one reason. And because companies and governments will be given unprecedented amounts of power over civilians is the other.

All isn’t doom and gloom, though. At least one US politician is maintaining some level-headedness: in October, California Governor Jerry Brown stopped legislation that would have allowed the telecom industry to inundate the state with mini-towers. Brown’s bold actions have permitted localities a say in where and how many cell towers are placed.

The state of Hawaii has stopped 5G and smart meters by collectively threatening to charge every person who installed such meters with liability for any health problems residents may suffer. Moreover, 180 scientists have started a petition to warn of 5G potential health effects. Maybe these actions will afford more time for additional studies and data collection. Just as importantly, maybe they’ll cause other politicians and figureheads to reflect on what they’ve been pushing for.

Millimeter waves (from 10-mm|30GHz to 1-mm|300GHz) are readily absorbed by the atmosphere and by the eyes and skin of living organisms

In the first quarter of 2017, the US population was being irradiated primarily by the following pulsed microwaves:

  • 700 million to 2.1 billion microwaves per second for 2G/3G/4G mobile data sent to cell phones
  • 2.4 billion to 5.8 billion microwaves per second for Wi-Fi data to tablets/laptops

In the near future, if Verizon, AT&T and others wireless carriers have their way, the US population will be radiated with additional, pulsed microwaves (24 billion to 90 billion microwaves per second) for 5G services and for navigation-assisted cars.

As with any toxic agent, the proper way to evaluate its toxicity is to consider not just the rate of exposure (as the Federal RF/MW radiation guidelines do), but consider total exposure over time. Below is a graph of RF/MW radiation exposures from Wi-Fi of an elementary school student using a wireless iPad. One can see extremely high peaks of electrical power.  These peaks cannot be seen using SAR tests. 

The intense peaks of RF/MW radiation and total exposure over time (not the average rate of exposure), are what impacts health the most.

In May of 2016, scientists at the US Federal National Toxicology Program released “partial findings” from the $25 million study on cellphone radiation, that found that both hyperplasias (abnormal increases in volume of a tissue or organ caused by the formation and growth of new normal cells) and tumors occur at significantly higher rates in the presence of continuous RF/MW radiation,

Disregarding these findings, six short weeks later, the FCC approved a move to 5G, and the wireless industry got to work installing  Distributed Antenna Systems on utility poles as quickly as they possibly could.  Some antennas have been placed as close as 20 feet from second story bedroom windows and will spray 4G or 5G RF/MW radiation 24/7/365 into these bedrooms.. Cancer clusters have been documented for people living closer than 2,000 feet to mobile communications base stations,.Antennas for mobile communications base stations should never be lower than 200 feet, and never closer than 2,000 feet to people and other living organisms.

Massive electromagnetic pollution is spiraling out of control, with both Industry and Government denying the scientific proof of harm from RF/MW radiation. Our Government and the Wireless Industry should not transmit digital data wirelessly, using the data-dense modulation schemes: Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM/OFDMA) used in Wi-Fi, 4G/LTE and 5G — because the US Government has already proven that the data-sparse 2G modulation is hazardous. We must, instead, transmit data from Point A to Point B to every business, every home, every school and farm with far superior fiber optic cables.”(3)

Most 5G Studies Misleading

“5G will use pulsed millimeter waves to carry information. But as Dr. Joel Moskowitz points out, most 5G studies are misleading because they do not pulse the waves. This is important because research on microwaves already tells us how pulsed waves have more profound biological effects on our body compared to non-pulsed waves. Previous studies, for instance, show how pulse rates of the frequencies led to gene toxicity and DNA strand breaks.

Live Testing Already Begun

AT&T have announced the availability of their 5G Evolution in Austin, Texas. 5G Evolution allows Samsung S8 and S8 + users access to faster speeds. This is part of AT&T’s plan to lay the 5G foundation while the standards are being finalized. This is expected to happen in late 2018. AT&T has eyes on 19 other metropolitan areas such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, Atlanta, San Francisco and so on. Indianapolis is up next on their 5G trail due to arrive in the summer.

Charter, the second-largest cable operator in the US, has been approved for an experimental 28 GHz license in Los Angeles. The outdoor tests will use fixed transmitters with a 1 km or smaller effective radius.

Qualcomm has already demonstrated a 5G antenna system with about 27 decibel gain. According to ABI Research, is “about 10 to 12 more db than a typical cellular base station antenna.” Not a good sign.

Many more private sector companies such as HTC, Oracle, Sprint, T-Mobile are playing a role in the developing of testing platforms by contributing time, knowledge or money.

In the UK the 3.4GHz band has been earmarked for 5G use with contracts awarded to O2, Vodaphone, EE and Three. While the 2.3GHz band, awarded to O2, is likely to be used for 5G too in time.”(4)

Take a look at this short video on some of the negative health effects of cell phones and 5G:

Take action

“In the meantime, we as individuals must do everything we can to protect ourselves. Here’s what you can do:

  • Understand EMFs and their behaviors
  • Use EMF meters to measure, mark and avoid hotspots
  • Whenever possible, limit your exposure: use a headset or speaker mode while talking on a cellphone.
  • Refuse to use 5G phones and devices. Full stop. And discourage those you know from doing so.
  • Refuse to buy anything ‘smart’ – ‘smart’ appliances, ‘smart’ heaters, etc.
  • No matter what, do NOT get a smart meter – these put high levels of 5G radiation right in your home
  • Join the growing numbers of dissenters. Get active with them here.
  • Do as the Hawaiians have done and threaten smart meter and 5G tech installers with liability. You can learn how to do that here.
  • Spread the word! Share this article with everyone you know”(2) 

Some Final Thoughts:

Cites:

(1) What are 4G/5G?

(2) Frightening Frequencies: The Dangers of 5G & What You Can Do About Them

(3) Microwave Radiation Primer

(4) 5G Radiation Dangers – 11 Reasons To Be Concerned

Related Posts:

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying

Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols)

Dirty Electricity and the Diseases of Civilization

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

EMF Exposure and Potential Health Effects

EMF-Impact on Health

How To Search For Cell Tower And Antenna Locations

Low Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation: A New Oxidant For Living Cells

The Depopulation Agenda

The History And Dangers Of Microwave Technology

The Microwave Control Grid

Vaccines

What Chemtrails Are Doing To Your Brain

 

 

Dirty Electricity and the Diseases of Civilization

 Another deliberately hidden critical facet of the damage inflicted by non-native electromagnetic energy on the human body is the effect of Dirty Electricity.

“Electric and magnetic fields, or EMF, are emitted from electrical devices or anything that uses electricity. Earth currents are low electrical currents found in soil. Natural activity deep within the earth causes some of these currents along with above ground electrical energy to produce low magnitude electrical currents. Transients and high frequency noise or signals come from the wiring of buildings, and from the use of common electrical devices found in homes and offices. The noise is created when electrical current is transmitted and interrupted.

“In these characterizations of electrical pollution, high frequency signals pollute regular electrical currents traveling in wires and currents through the earth. To better understand the background for the causes of electrical pollution, it is helpful to learn the basics of how the electrical current works.

“Regular “clean” power enters homes, buildings, and offices at 60 Hz. The increased use of electrical power overloads electrical grid base, which distributes the power. Power is “dirty” or polluted when it contains the high frequency signals flowing through overloaded wires, and not just clean 60 Hz power.

“The pollution of electricity is often compared to how water is polluted. At the source, water is clean. It is what comes with the water and pollutants along its path to the recipient that makes the water harmful to humans. However, like water pollution in many ways, electrical pollution is complex and often difficult to understand for the common consumer. The causes are varied and sometimes cannot be identified with certainty. However, the bulk of overloaded electricity bases can be attributed to the reliance on electrical appliances in today’s environment.

“In the 1950’s, the National Electrical Safety Code required a neutral wire to return wire to utilities. In this code it was forbidden to use the earth as a neutral return. This was a worsening problem in rural, farm areas where the currents were being returned to the soil affecting the feeding of animals. Later, the Public Service Commission allowed utilities to use grounding rods to serve as neutral wires for return. This was done instead of increasing the size of the neutral rods. Installing ground rods is a less costly solution than making the neutral rods larger in size. The grounding rods serve as an alternate and additional pathway for the energy to return to the substation instead of to the earth.

“Those concerned about electrical pollution say the size of neutral wires to make sure energy is returned to its source needs to be much larger. The current regulated size of the neutrals is not large enough to handle the load due to the greater use of electricity. The currents that are not properly directed are emitted into the environment or into homes or offices where electrical devices are widely relied upon by consumers. Neutral wires are not often sized for the modern electrical load. Power that is misdirected into the earth or home environments contains a much higher frequency that the 60 Hz classification making it “dirty” or unclean.

“Dr. Robert O. Becker, author of Cross Currents and the Body Electric stated that “I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time that the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields. I consider that to be far greater on a global scale that warming”.

“The high frequency currents most commonly created by computers and other electronic devices are circulated by various wires and systems, emitting the high frequency currents into home or office environments. Many cases have been documented where decreasing the amount of “dirty” electricity has lessened the effects of health problems and complications. Some of those health problems being attributed to electrical pollution include fibromyalgia, attention deficit disorder, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, diabetes, and asthma. There are also cases that detail that electrical pollution aggravates other preexisting conditions like multiple sclerosis and migraine headaches.(2)

“The diseases of civilization or lifestyle diseases include cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes and are thought to be caused by changes in diet, exercise habits, and lifestyle which occur as countries industrialize. I think that the critical variable which causes the radical changes in mortality accompanying industrialization is electrification. Beginning in 1979, with the work of Wertheimer and Leeper, there has been increasing evidence that some facet of electromagnetic field exposure is associated epidemiologically with an increased incidence of leukemia, certain other cancers and non-cancers like Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and suicide. With the exception of a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum from infra red through visible light, ultraviolet light and cosmic rays, the rest of the spectrum is man-made and foreign to human evolutionary experience. I suggest that from the time that Thomas Edison started his direct current electrical distribution system in the 1880s in New York City until now, when most of the world is electrified, the electricity carried high frequency voltage transients which caused and continue to cause what are considered to be the normal diseases of civilization. Even today, many of these diseases are absent or have very low incidence in places without electricity.

“When Edison and Tesla opened the Pandora’s box of electrification in the 1880s, the US vital registration system was primitive at best, and infectious disease death rates were falling rapidly. City residents had higher mortality rates and shorter life expectancy than rural residents. Rural white males in 1900 had an expectation of life at birth of over 10 years longer than urban residents.

“Although the authors of the 1930 US vital statistics report noted a 58.2% cancer mortality excess in urban areas, it raised no red flags. The census bureau residential electrification data was obviously not linked to the mortality data. Epidemiologists in that era were still concerned with the communicable diseases. Court Brown and Doll reported the appearance of the child- hood leukemia age peak in 1961, forty years after the US vital statistics mortality data on which it was based was available. I reported a cluster of childhood leukemia a decade after it occurred, only because I looked for it. Real time or periodic analysis of national or regional vital statistics data is still only rarely done in the US.

“The real surprise in this data set is that cardiovascular disease, diabetes and suicide, as well as cancer seem to be strongly related to level of residential electrification. A community-based epidemiologic study of urban rural differences in coronary heart disease and its risk factors was carried out in the mid 1980s in New Delhi, India and in a rural area 50 km away. The prevalence of coronary heart disease was three times higher in the urban residents, despite the fact that the rural residents smoked more and had higher total caloric and saturated fat intakes. Most cardiovascular disease risk factors were two to three times more common in the urban residents. Rural electrification projects are still being carried out in parts of the rural area which was studied.

“It seems unbelievable that mortality differences of this magnitude could go unexplained for over 70 years after they were first reported and 40 years after they were noticed. I think that in the early part of the 20th century nobody was looking for answers. By the time EMF epidemiology got started in 1979 the entire population was exposed to EMFs. Cohort studies were therefore using EMF-exposed population statistics to compute expected values, and case-control studies were comparing more exposed cases to less exposed controls. The mortality from lung cancer in two pack a day smokers is over 20 times that of non-smokers but only three times that of one pack a day smokers. After 1956, the EMF equivalent of a non-smoker ceased to exist in the US. An exception to this is the Amish who live without electricity. Like rural US residents in the 1940s, Amish males in the 1970s had very low cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality rates.

“If this hypothesis and findings outlined here are even partially true, the explosive recent increase in radiofrequency radiation, and high frequency voltage transients sources, especially in urban areas from cell phones and towers, terrestrial antennas, wi-fi and wi-max systems, broadband internet over power lines, and personal electronic equipment, suggests that like the 20th century EMF epidemic, we may already have a 21st century epidemic of morbidity and mortality underway caused by electromagnetic fields. The good news is that many of these diseases may be preventable by environmental manipulation, if society chooses to.(1)

 
 

How To Search For Cell Tower And Antenna Locations

 

http://www.antennasearch.com/

The link above is to the Antenna Search site, which can be used determine the locations of cell towers and antennas that are operating around a specific location.

Get detailed information on more than 1.9 million towers and antennas in the U.S.

Includes Google maps, ownership details and contact information.

Pinpoint existing towers, future towers and even small hidden antennas.

Get detailed information on:

Existing Towers: Registered and Non-Registered structures where antennas are placed. Towers may be used for various services including Cellular, Paging, Microwave and others.

Future Towers: Newly filed (or pending) applications to construct new towers. Application info includes location coordinates and detailed ownership data.

Antennas: The actual emitters of radio signals. Antennas can be placed on towers (multiple) or can be installed stand alone on top of existing buildings. Stand alone antennas are small (well below 200 ft). You may also check multiple antennas to determine which cell phone carriers are located on a particular tower.

– Quick Statistics (as of Sunday 3/13/2016 Weekly Update) –

Total(US)                     Top State

Towers 599,462             Texas (58,648)
Antennas 1,818,436           California (134,144)

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

The following information was shared at a symposia of the International Society for Bioelectricity and was presented 24 years ago in 1992. The theme topics for the Symposia were cancer, neural function, cell signaling, pineal gland function, and immune system interactions

“If one used electromagnetic energy sensors to view the world…..100 years ago, the world would have looked quite dim. Now the world glows with electromagnetic (em) energy emissions at most frequencies of the non-ionizing portion of the spectrum, such as power line fields, radio waves, microwaves, etc.

Living organisms are complex electrochemical systems that up until very recently have interacted with a relatively simple and weak magnetic field and few EMF energy emitters.

“A wide range of living organisms, including humans, [utilize EMF] energy to regulate various critical cellular systems; we see this in the complex of circadian rhythms.

“Thus, it is not surprising that the massive introduction of electromagnetic fields in an enormous range of new frequencies, modulations, and intensities in recent years has affected living organisms. In fact, it would be incredible and beyond belief if these electromagnetic fields did not affect the electrochemical systems we call living organisms.

“Much of the literature on electromagnetic field interactions published before the middle 1980s is irrelevant to biologists. Most of it was generated by the engineering community’s attempt to find out if their high-power equipment creates a hazard. Thus, little attention was paid to the variables that are important in biology. Instead, efforts were wasted in fruitless controversies such as whether the effects seen were thermal or non-thermal.

“In recent years, though, the convergence of a number of lines of research has led a diversity of biologists to carry out experiments using low-intensity electromagnetic fields to study the function of living cells and systems.

“The toxicology model used by investigators in earlier years was not the appropriate model on which to design experiments. It was assumed that electromagnetic fields are a foreign substance to living organisms, like lead or cyanide. With foreign substances in a toxicology model, the greater the dose, the greater the effect-a dose-response relationship. Thus, experiments tended to be designed with high doses and with little regard for other parameters such as modulation and frequency. This is one reason why those earlier studies yielded so little useful information.

“As noted [above], electromagnetic fields are not a foreign substance. Living organisms are electrochemical systems that use emfs in everything from protein folding through cellular communication to nervous system function. A more appropriate model of how living organisms can be expected to respond to em fields would be to compare them to a radio receiver.

“An electromagnetic signal a radio detects (let us call it signal x) and transduces into the sound of music is almost un-measurably weak. Yet the radio is immersed in a sea of em signals from power lines, radio stations, TV stations, radars, etc. The radio doesn’t notice the sea of signals because they are not the appropriate frequency or modulation. Thus, they don’t disturb the music we hear. If we expose the radio to an appropriately tuned em signal or harmonic, however, even if it is very weak compared to signal x, it will interfere with the music. Similarly, if we expose a living system to a very weak em signal, if the signal is appropriately “tuned,” it could facilitate or interfere with normal function. This is the model that much biological data and theory tell us to use, not a toxicology model. And this is the model that is now starting to be used so fruitfully.”(1)

And yes, more researchers understand this and realize the need to use this approach in their experiments, but funding for research has been and is currently limited, as is any motivation by the controlled media to expose the results of those studies that have been done.

And currently there are nearly as many cell phones as there are people.

That’s a lot of lab rats…….

 
 

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, An Introduction Programming Manual was uncovered quite by accident on July 7, 1986 when an employee of Boeing Aircraft Co. purchased a surplus IBM copier for scrap parts at a sale, and discovered inside details of a plan, hatched in the embryonic days of the “Cold War” which called for control of the masses through manipulation of industry, peoples’ pastimes, education and political leanings. It called for a quiet revolution, putting brother against brother,
and diverting the public’s attention from what is really going on.

Some quotes from the text:

“It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide. This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power and without full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodologies for economic conquest – it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons and the public.

“You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at human society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without the loss of discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do not deviate from them.

“In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it was only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public would be able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new silent weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they were for providing a private utopia.

“All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?

“Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war
against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few. In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class
of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name “silent weapons”.”(1)

Short video by Deborah Taveres on the Silent Weapons System:

A reading of the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:

Cite-(Read More)

(1)A link to the document Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars:

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Epigenetics- Conditions of Existence

There has been an ever increasing amount of information coming from the scientific press that each individual has, through no fault of their own, a silent killer, or two or three, hiding in their DNA deep inside their body’s cells. Many of these press releases characterize the development of genetically connected diseases as virtually inevitable, with the result being that individuals become terrified concerning their supposed fate. The articles are often written as though the particular genetic marker is laying in wait for the right moment to express itself and inflict its damage on the helpless victim.

More and more people are nervously getting tested for their genetic profile in order to prepare for the inevitability of any number of disturbing diseases. Unfortunately, those in the medical establishment, who have a primary focus on cash flow, are adding to the paranoia that many people are experiencing, by offering everything from pharmaceuticals to surgical preventatives so people can feel more safe from their impending doom. The recent stories about Angelina Jolie having her breasts removed after she found out she had genetic markers for the development of breast cancer, is a prime example of the current extreme solutions being put forth by this kind of thinking.

There is clearly validity to certain aspects of the science of genetics, but the current exaggerated paranoid focus on genetic disease markers is not based on valid scientific interpretation. This misinterpretation has led to warnings that are blown way out of proportion, having no direct connection to actual inherent threats.

According to the Human Genome Project, which did a thorough study of human DNA, we all have twenty-two thousand genes, for all sorts of bodily aspects, good and bad. Not all of these genes are actively expressed, which is a good thing, while many remain dormant. A gene will not express itself at all unless the environment surrounding it becomes favorable to that expression. As an example, a cancer gene needs certain environmental requirements to be met before it can activate. The determinant here isn’t genetics, it’s epigenetics.

Epigenetics involves the study of changes in the regulation of gene activity and expression that are not dependent on gene sequence. Epigenetics refers to both heritable changes in gene activity and expression (in the progeny of cells or of individuals) and also stable, long-term alterations in the transcriptional potential of a cell that are not necessarily heritable. In other words, epigenetic changes can modify the activation of certain genes, but not the sequence of DNA. Additionally, the chromatin proteins associated with DNA may be activated or silenced. This is why the differentiated cells in a multi-cellular organism express only the genes that are necessary for their own activity.

Epigenetic changes are preserved when cells divide. Most epigenetic changes only occur within the course of one individual organism’s lifetime, but, if gene inactivation occurs in a sperm or egg cell that results in fertilization, then some epigenetic changes can be transferred to the next generation.

DNA damage can also cause epigenetic changes. DNA damages are very frequent, occurring at a rate of 1,000 to 1,000,000 molecular lesions per cell per day. These damages are largely repaired, but at the site of a DNA repair, epigenetic changes can remain.

So the term epigenetics could be described as referring to those things that have influence over our genes, leading to gene expression or gene silencing. Epigenetic influences would include chemicals, nutrients, electromagnetic radiation, including various wavelengths of light, along with any other environmental influence on the body’s biological function. We are all products of our environment.

Our genes are the first draft of what we are created to be, but the experience those genes face determines how our life plays out over time. In other words, it’s not the genes alone that predispose us to disease, but rather those things within our diet and environment that act upon our genes. As a conservative estimate in genetics, the average person actually controls anywhere from a low of 80 percent to upward of 97 percent or more of their own genetic expression with respect to potential disease processes and longevity.

It is vitally important that we stop focusing on disease states and instead think about what happens to the cell’s environment that dictates its fate. There is a lot of data over the last fifty years that shows that humans functioning in an “altered field” will experience symptoms common to diseases such as obesity, Hashimoto’s, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes. The field refers to the local environment that cells and the organism find themselves in. The field constantly changes as we move through the environment. This includes the nutrients available to us and the electromagnetic field around us.

DNA has been shown experimentally to be controlled by a magnetic field. Whatever activates and electrifies DNA is the major determining factor in genetic expression. Genetic expression is directly tied to the electromagnetic field that life lives in. To deny it is to deny experiments already proving it is true.

The field we face at sea level is not the same as the one on the top of Everest. The field we experience near a fault next to a volcano is not the same as the one found on an ice sheet in Antarctica. Since our brain never perceives the field through vision, sound, touch, taste, or smell, the mind never accounts for the effect of the field on its cells. It is almost like it never exists. This problem is compounded when you consider that, in our modern world, a child’s brain has to navigate an altered electromagnetic background before it is fully developed. As it turns out, children are more sensitive to the field because their brains are un-myelinated. Myelin provides some protection, to the deeper grey brain matter, from the effects of an altered electromagnetic field.

This information allows us to gain insights into just how the field affects human epigenetic expression. The field dictates all epigenetic expression and it extends to trans-generational epigenetics as well. Genes are important, but they are not the dominant player modern science believes they are. The ‘field’ makes the call when gene products should and need to be expressed. If the electromagnetic field has been altered from the native frequencies that humans originally developed within, then the result will be alterations in gene expression with potentially damaging results. These are things we need to pay deep attention to if we are going to understand the mystery of how our genes are expressed.

Darwin was right about the conditions of existence being more important than natural selection for life. He said this in his original book on evolution. He spent the rest of his life trying to figure out what controlled this biologic process. Today, conditions of existence have been renamed, and they are called epigenetics. It turns out the “on and off switch” that Darwin was looking for in our genome is an ELF (extremely low frequency) electromagnetic radiation, called the Schumann resonance. It was not discovered until 93 years after Darwin wrote The Origin of Species. The Schumann resonance is an ELF in the lowest energy and frequency range of the electromagnetic spectrum and our brain cannot see it, touch it, or smell it but our cells sense it using quantum resonance. It is below the power of the visible light spectrum where the photoelectric reigns supreme.

Energy has many forms on Earth and ……the photoelectric effect is the most powerful form of energy in our world. Biology uses it and the ELF of the Earth’s magnetic field to control genetic expression. This is an ELF that few seem to realize but has major physiologic power to control how genes are expressed in wellness and in disease states by affecting water chemistry and protein chemistry.

Water is the perfect chemical magnetic dipole, so this is why it is the major substrate on the earth to becomes active or passive in energy transfers with the earth’s magnetic field. When water finds itself in our native magnetic field, water becomes able to transfer more energy from the sun’s light to living things. This is why water is the liquid of life and is called liquid sunshine by some biologists. When water exists in an extreme low frequency (ELF) EMF field, as was normally found on earth before 1850, water’s hydrogen bonds oscillate and resonate at 7.83 Hz or harmonics of this frequency up to 89 Hz. In actuality, the earth magnetic field alters itself seasonally from 0-30Hz due to the sun’s magnetic field.

These changes in micropulsations directly act upon life by changing DNA and RNA expression. We call this epigenetics. How does this happen? The amount of oscillations from these extremely low frequency natural EMFs cause a favorable change in the hydrogen bonds of water to alter the bonding angles in the dipoles of water molecules to become maximally efficient to transfer energy from the sun to our cells. Since 1950, this magnetic field has been radically altered by man.

Another reason genes are not the whole story is that humans have more non coding DNA than every other primate. Our genome is only the first copy of life. It is the stage. It is not the map for a whole life. This helps explain why only 2 percent of the human genome codes for proteins. Ninety-eight percent of the human genome codes for retrotransposons, or junk DNA. Today we know that 99.3% of our DNA is used to alter our genome based upon epigenetic signaling. This is why humans have more non coding DNA (ncDNA) than any other animal on the planet. It turns out that ncDNA contains the epigenetic instructions of how to energize the proteins in our genome to alter function based upon environmental pressures. In this, “junk DNA” are the instructions for how energy transforms matter. The instructions energy gives, specifically electromagnetic energy, to our non-coding DNA is what ultimately makes us different. These energies come from our environment.

This is how biology works. Energy changes the structure and function of matter. Proteins are a form of matter. Energy sculpts what proteins can and will do and how they will act in a cell. This is called conditions of existence, or epigenetics, today. Protein is the matter coded for by DNA. Chimps and humans share the same genes 99.9% but we differ radically in how we energize our DNA. This is what ultimately makes us a different species.

The current variations from the original native electromagnetic frequencies have resulted in the increasingly common diseases that are seen in medicine today. As these environmental frequencies change, it becomes increasingly necessary to understand how the body’s biochemistry changes so we can alter our therapeutic maneuvers to compensate for these environmental issues.

Today, many of the therapeutic maneuvers that we call evidence-based, are, in fact, removing energy from the biologic system. Removing energy from this system causes it to become more unstable, and it leads to poor cell signaling and disease. Proper cell signaling requires a constant, steady flow of energy within the semiconductors of cells. Any treatments that cause a loss of energy, cause patients to emit more black box radiation. These effects are compounded when we advocate a diet or a modern lifestyle that also allows for more energy losses. This further underscores why carbohydrates are a real problem for modern humans because they only give us 36 ATP, compared to 147 ATP from beta oxidation of fats. Carbohydrates can be utilized by the body when cell signaling is working well. But when this signaling is not working well, as happens on earth today, health issues will result from the ingestion of carbohydrates.

The science of epigenetics makes clear that our DNA is not our destiny. Our modern beliefs are usually the cause of our epigenetic decline. Today, medicine is hanging its proverbial hat on dogma it calls “evidence-based” that has divorced itself from most epigenetic mechanisms. Evidence-based research is looking at data over a population and then taking that generalization and applying it to a treatment algorithm for a person.

Epigenetic models have already established that our cellular structure can be modified by thoughts, perceptions, beliefs, environment, diet and behavior, thus determining who we are, how we respond to disease, what we are and in many ways, what we will become. To return to the example stated above, cancer is not a genetic disease, it is an epigenetic one linked to massive loss of energy because of choices the person has made knowingly or unknowingly to themselves. Cancer explodes when we lose control of T cell immunity. 

When we lose energy for any reason at all, the brain and the immune system are normally the two systems that go awry first, in our particular species. This is why Neolithic diseases like Alzheimer’s and Hashimoto’s are exploding today, when 120 years ago they were unheard of.

Eating a diet that provides a huge source of energy makes more sense when you are constantly losing energy to your environment. This is why the Epi-paleo template, developed by Dr. Jack Kruse, stands above any other for today’s condition of existence. It is a Rx designed around our epigenetic mechanisms, and not our cultural or medical beliefs. This, however, does not mean it will remain our best option. We must use epigenetics to guide our decisions in the changing environment we are facing today. In fact, the optimal diet for us all may change in the next ten years because of what is happening today in our world. The human diet should never be thought of as static. It must change as the environment we create around us changes.

This implies “our species solution” really is a moving target because of our epigenetic toolbox. An architect far better and smarter than us has given us that epigenetic toolbox, and we now have the ability to use it by altering our behaviors to change our lives.

Cites:

Nora Gedgaudas, CNS, CNT; Primal Body, Primal Mind; 2011

Energy and Epigenetics 1: The Infant Brain is Unique
August 4, 2013  Jack Kruse, M.D.

Energy and Epigenetics 2: The Real DHA Story
August 17, 2013  Jack Kruse, M.D.

Energy and Epigenetics 3: Autoimmunity, Cancer, Autism
August 31, 2013  Jack Kruse, M.D.

Energy and Epigenetics 4: Light, Water, Magnetism
September 9, 2013  Jack Kruse, M.D.

TENSEGRITY 2: CORTISOL
June 26, 2014  Jack Kruse, M.D.

Energy and Epigenetics 6: Quantum Cell Theory, Life as a Collective Phenomena
October 4, 2013 Jack Kruse, M.D.

Energy and Epigenetics 7: The Epigenetic Toolbox
October 18, 2013  Jack Kruse, M.D.

Wikipedia

EMF-Impact on Health

magnetic-field-lines-154887_150Over the last several years there has been an increasing amount of information concerning EMF’s (Electromagnetic Field) and their effect on health. As is often the case with complex technologies, the average person’s knowledge about EMF’s is limited and often contains inaccurate information. Since electromagnetic fields cannot normally be seen or touched, individuals must rely on information from those who study the properties and effects of this form of radiation. The goal of this post is to give an overview of EMF’s with a focus on what properties they have, their impact on humans, how they may benefit or negatively affect optimal health, and how to mitigate the negative effects they can cause.

An electromagnetic field (also EMF or EM field) is a physical field produced by electrically charged objects, such as power lines, transformers, electrical panels, building wiring, appliances, lighting, computers, telephones, cell phones, Bluetooth devices and even automobile engines. This field affects the behavior of charged objects in the vicinity of the field. This is a key fact to remember as we consider the properties of electromagnetic fields. The field can be viewed as the combination of an electric field and a magnetic field. The behavior of the electromagnetic field can be resolved into four different parts of a loop: The electric and magnetic fields are generated by electric charges, The electric and magnetic fields interact with each other, The electric and magnetic fields produce forces on charged particles, The electric charges move in space. The potential effects of electromagnetic fields on human health vary widely depending on the frequency and intensity of the fields. Due to the close proximity of electrical wiring in modern buildings, the typical person receives more EMF radiation from electrical wiring than any other source. The number two source is usually from cell phones, appliances, TVs and computers. The third largest exposure is often from power lines. The fourth largest is usually from automobiles, cell towers, etc.

EMF directly affects the brain by generating damaging excitatory activity in the the cells potentially leading to anxiety-related disorders, leptin resistance, autism, and brain cancers. A primary effect of EMF radiation is that the molecular clock in the brain, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), as time elapses, may no longer be able to work precisely, leading to a myriad of symptoms and disorders in the brain and body. Studies have shown that EMF’s can adversely affect the pineal gland’s secretion of melatonin. Melatonin increases the effectiveness of the body’s natural killer lymphocytes, thus inhibiting tumor growth. The reduction of pineal gland function has been implicated in the development of breast, ovarian, prostate and melanoma cancers. Decreased melatonin levels have also been directly related to depression, mood changes and psychiatric disorders.

atjatszotorony-205456_640Tests have also shown that certain EMF frequencies, such as those produced by cell phones, have the effect of weakening the blood brain barrier, allowing toxic substances to be absorbed into the brain, that are normally blocked by this barrier. Except for visible light and infrared EMF, we can not perceive any of these energies without instruments designed to find them. The problem is our brain senses them all without sensation being perceived consciously. As a result of this, the vast majority of people are completely unaware of the massive increase of EMF radiation in our environment.

The electromagnetic energies that originally surrounded life were simple. There was the Schumann resonance, which was found to be 7.83 Hz, which essentially is a weak ELF electromagnetic field modulated by the micro-pulsations. There were random bursts of of static electricity from lightening centered at 10,000 Hz and they reverberated over the entire Earth’s surface at any time. 3000-5000 of these strikes happen simultaneously. Light was present from our sun. UV and infrared light were originally the most abundant forms of EMF on the surface of the planet for 4 billion years. Studies have shown that individuals subjected to a 7.83 Hz frequency tended to express that it resulted in their feeling ‘good’, while tests with other frequencies could cause various reactions from riotous behavior to depression.

In 1893 Nikola Tesla demonstrated the first AC power system at the World’s Fair. Thus began enormous changes to the EMF’s surrounding the Earth and affecting its inhabitants. The resulting gradual electrification of the cities, subjected city dwellers to the EMF fields generated by 60 cycle AC currents flowing in their houses and workplaces. Since World War II a vast array of different EMF has been added to the human and animal environment. The military and industry began to use shorter wavelengths and to bounce them off the ionosphere for long distance communication. The use of these ELF’s is incredibly damaging since these RF waves are never de-modulated, which means they last forever, continuing to bounce around within the Earth’s ionosphere.

Once cell phones were invented the surrounding sea of EMF grew exponentially, so that currently the first mile above the Earth’s surface is filled with 2 million times the amount of EMF that we were surrounded by in 1900. Humans have altered their electromagnetic background more than any other aspect of their environment. These changes have come over a very short period of time and the results on the human biologic system is clearly seen in the epidemiology of disease over the 20th century. We are literally swimming in an ocean of electromagnetic energies that life has never before had to deal with. Because these energies can’t be seen or easily felt, their effects are ignored by most individuals and kept under wraps by those who stand to gain monetarily from their proliferation.

The best we can do as individuals is to minimize the impact of undesirable EMF pollution and interference by taking the following precautions in order to support the body’s ability to respond to stress and maintain optimal health. The following list should be consulted, keeping in mind that the less you are exposed to these harmful EMF’s the better chance you have to remain in optimal health.

With the recognition that it is currently impossible to live a life free of this harmful radiation, the emphasis should always be to eliminate if possible and at the very least to minimize your exposure as much as possible.

The following recommendations will go a long way in decreasing your exposure to non-native EMF:

1) Do not live near high tension power lines.

2) Eliminate or properly shield Smart meters that have been installed by your electrical service provider.

3) Minimize the use of cell phones and always use the speakerphone option.

4) Minimize or eliminate the use of cordless phones at home and at work. Utilize a land line telephone at home and at work.

5) Avoid Bluetooth headsets and all other headsets except air-tube headsets.

6) Minimize or eliminate Wifi at home and at work. Utilize hard wired devices such as computers, tablets, mice, keyboards, printers, speakers, phones, security wiring. Minimize EMF influence by unplugging electrical appliances and Wifi routers when not in use and especially in the bedroom.

7) Utilize nonelectrical alternatives for home appliances. The Lehman’s Non-electric catalog is a great resource for this.

8) Minimize or avoid the use of microwave ovens.

For more info and products for EMF testing and mitigation, take a look at Less EMF on the web: http://www.lessemf.com/

If you would like to rent test meters take a look at Neuert Electromagnetic Services on the web: http://www.emfcenter.com/metrsale.htm

Cites:

Primal Body, Primal Mind
Nora T. Gedgaudas, CNS, CNT  2011

Simple Steps to Reduce EMF Exposure In Your Home or Office
Misty Williams  2013

EMF 5: What Are the Biologic Effects of EMF?
Jack Kruse, M.D.  February 14, 2013

Background Information About EMFs
Michael R. Neuert, MA, BSME   2006

In Rhythm With the Earth: Electromagnetic Fields and Your Health
Michael R. Neuert, MA, BSME  Common Ground Magazine, 1993

Related Posts:

Dirty Electricity and the Diseases of Civilization

Electromagnetic Field Interactions With Biological Systems

EMF Exposure and Potential Health Effects

How Search For Cell Tower And Antenna Locations

Low Intensity Radiofrequency Radiation: A New Oxidant For Living Cells

Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars

The History And Dangers Of Microwave Technology

The Microwave Control Grid