It’s time to bust open another longstanding hoax.
The best place to start is with the news from Japan in August of 1945.
News of the dropping of the ‘Atomic’ bomb on Hiroshima, August 6th.
Thanks to the heavy media coverage of this event many people around the world perceived this as a whole new terrible devastating weapon of war. The photos and reports coming from Japan appeared to show the horrific power of this ‘atomic’ weapon, inciting an ominous fear that would be utilized up to the present day as a way to manipulate the public into supporting a long string of contrived military campaigns affecting many sovereign nations.
***Trigger Warning*** Safe-Space folks should retreat to their padded safe-room now.
Are the rest of you ready?
No ‘Atomic’ bomb fell on Hiroshima……or Nagasaki!!!
Let’s take a look at this hoax.
Atomic bombs were and are just propaganda. There is no evidence that they worked 1945 or later.
Below is a photo from Hiroshima ‘ground zero’ autumn 1945 after the streets had been cleared of debris:
“It is clear that there was no ‘ground zero’ and that no atomic bomb exploded here at all and destroyed buildings, bridges, inhabitants and everything as suggested by US military authorities. It seems that all, wooden/paper buildings housing mostly poor people were simply burnt down by napalm carpet bombing (exactly like Tokyo March and Yokohama May 1945) leaving steel bridges and the external walls/roofs of all brick/concrete office buildings intact.”(1)
And here’s a photo of Tokyo after it was napalmed:
It’s no coincidence they look similar.
They were both fire-bombed with napalm bombs.
Notice the bridges and roads are undamaged in both photos.
Take a look at the following videos explaining/demonstrating napalm bombs:
This building was very close to the supposed ‘ground zero’:
It is common knowledge that 1945 central Hiroshima and Nagasaki was 95% wooden/paper houses for housing and simple stores/shops while only 5% of the buildings were concrete buildings, including banks, insurance companies, trading companies offices, etc. And all had quite bad fire protection.
Take a look at this photo showing intact concrete buildings:
The photo below is of Hiroshima city center, before the bombing, showing the target Aioi bridge and location of Bank of Japan office and location above where the alleged A-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku:
And after a supposed ‘atomic’ bomb dropped this close to the Bank of Japan building, the building looked like this:
And here’s how it looks today:
“Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan, testified:
In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.
It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.
I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.
At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.
What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.
The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.
Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the center of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.”(1)
The photo below shows the ten-story press building and other surrounding buildings:
The photo below shows the Gelbi bank building 1946 at Hiroshima at Rijo Dori street – 380 meters sideways from and about 600 meters (1,800 feet) below the alleged ‘atomic bomb’ explosion and blast/heat wave FIREBALL center across the street:
The photo below is another view of the Gelbi Bank Building and the Bank of Japan building:
“The a-bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were thus just propaganda 1945 to end WW2 in Japan and to impress the USSR. Fooled the world then as there was no free press around. Only censorship.
To keep the hoax going two a-bomb museums were quickly built at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for school children to be fooled by.
Another a-bomb museum is in Albuquerque, New Mexico, paid for by the US government that started the hoax and keeps it going.”(1)
‘Atomic’ Bomb History
“The “a-bombs” were actually invented by science fiction writer H.G Wells in 1913 nearly 30 years before US president Roosevelt started the top-secret Manhattan Project. Wells’ story, The World Set Free, describes cities around the world being devastated by what he called “atomic bombs”. Wells predicted not only the mushroom cloud we associate with a-bombs, but their lasting radiation as well.
“Few who adventured into these areas of destruction and survived attempted any repetition of their experiences. There are stories of puffs of luminous, radio-active vapour drifting sometimes scores of miles from the bomb centre and killing and scorching all they overtook.”(7)
So, just like many other science fiction stories that have been and continue to be fed to the public as science fact, the A-Bomb story had its unique grand opening for public viewing in Hiroshima.
As the historical story goes, on August 2, 1939, just before the beginning of World War II, Albert Einstein wrote to then President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Einstein and several other scientists told Roosevelt of efforts in Nazi Germany to purify uranium-235, which could be used to build an atomic bomb.
Roosevelt then allegedly ordered the atomic bombs to be designed (or created) and built by clever US scientists and engineers 1939, 1941 or 1942, it is not clear when, because it is still a military secret in 2014. Was it 1939?
The very secret Briggs Advisory Committee on Uranium, created by Roosevelt, had its first meeting on October 21, 1939, in Washington, D.C., only seven weeks after WWII started and discussed Making uranium (fission) chain-reaction bombs.
“Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits into smaller parts (lighter nuclei). A nuclear fission process produces, apart from energy, free neutrons. Nuclear fission produces energy for nuclear power but cannot drive the explosion of nuclear weapons as suggested by Wikipedia and others.
Nuclear power is possible because certain substances called nuclear fuels undergo fission, when struck by fission neutrons, and in turn emit neutrons, when they break apart. This makes possible a peaceful, self-sustaining, moderated nuclear chain reaction that releases energy at a controlled rate in a nuclear reactor. Nuclear fission in a nuclear power plant just produces energy, heat, that heats water to drive electric generators. No smoke! The nuclear fuel becomes other, lighter atoms.”(1)
So the alleged goal of this Advisory Committee was to come up with a way to create a fission bomb using U-235 metal, which would end up being an impossible task…….and may have already been known to be an impossible task by some of its members.
Nevertheless, the Advisory Committee eventually morphed into the Manhattan Project and was off to the races to build an Atomic Bomb.
But just like so many other hoaxes we’ve seen over the years this was just another ‘project’ that was vital for ‘National Security,’ whether it was physically possible or not. Does the fake moon landing come to mind here?
Anyway, let’s look at how this nuclear bomb hoax was contrived…..
The scientists involved in the project to create a fission bomb focused their initial efforts on developing a way to efficiently extract U-235 from uranium ore, since U-235 only made up 0.72% of normal uranium metal ore and has to be separated from the remainder (mostly uranium-238). To obtain 61 kg of pure uranium-235 (U-235) metal you need about 8,400 kg or 8.4 ton of uranium to separate the uranium-235 (U-235) from.
Several uranium enrichment factories, using different methods of enrichment, were constructed at great cost, although the ability to create a fission bomb had not been proven.
“How to separate uranium-235 (U-235) from uranium-238? Well, one way, the gas extraction method, is that you treat the uranium with fluorine, F, so it becomes a gas – UF6 – and then, in gas separators you separate the lighter U-235 F6 molecules from the little (three neutrons) heavier U-238 F6 molecules! And then you remove the fluorine again and have pure, metal uranium-235 (U-235). Voilà!
Another supposed way was to use magnetism to separate U-235 from U-238. Some people say Clinton Engineer Works, 20 miles west of Knoxville, TN, produced the [U-235] using the calutron electromagnetic isotope separation (EMIS) process. Hundreds of thousands of magnetic type separators (!) driven by great amount of electricity were used by Clinton Engineer Works to produce some hundred kilograms of U-235. Reason for so many separators was the relatively low product collection rate of the process and the long cycle time required to recover material between runs.
It is, however 2016 – 71 years later, still TOP SECRET, what US factory managed to separate U-235 from 10 tons of U-238 by gas separation or whatever – magnetism? Reason apparently being that no such workshop or technology existed at that time, 1942-1945.
Pure plutonium-239 may have a multiplication factor larger than one, which means that if the metal is present in sufficient quantity and with an appropriate geometry (e.g., a sphere of sufficient size), it can form a critical mass.
Trace amounts of at least four plutonium isotopes (plutonium-238, -239, -240, and -244) can be found in nature. Small traces of plutonium-239, a few parts per trillion, and its decay products are naturally found in some concentrated ores of uranium. The ratio of plutonium-239 to uranium at the Cigar Lake Mine uranium deposit ranges from 2.4×10−12 to 44×10.−12
These trace amounts of 239Pu originate in the following fashion: on rare occasions, 238U undergoes spontaneous fission, and in the process, the nucleus emits one or two free neutrons with some kinetic energy. When one of these neutrons strikes the nucleus of another 238U atom, it is absorbed by the atom, which becomes 239U. With a relatively short half-life, 239U decays to 239Np, which decays into 239Pu.
During fission, a fraction of the binding energy, which holds a nucleus together, is released as a large amount of electromagnetic and kinetic energy (much of the latter being quickly converted to thermal energy). Fission of a kilogram of plutonium-239 can [theoretically] produce an explosion equivalent to 21,000 tons of TNT (88,000 GJ). It is this energy that makes plutonium-239 useful in nuclear weapons and reactors.
Plutonium’s higher spontaneous fission rate made it much more useful in the creation of nuclear bombs, so Plutonium breeder reactors were built to create artificially increased amounts of Plutonium 239 isotopes from Uranium 238.
Emilio Segrè at Los Alamos discovered fairly early on that reactor-bred plutonium had a higher concentration of the isotope plutonium-240 than cyclotron-produced plutonium. Plutonium-240 has a high spontaneous fission rate, raising the overall background neutron level of the plutonium sample. The original gun-type plutonium weapon, code-named “Thin Man“, had to be abandoned as a result—since the increased number of spontaneous neutrons meant that nuclear pre-detonation (fizzle) was likely.
As a result, the production of Plutonium was shifted from the Oak Ridge Tennessee nuclear site to the Hanford B Reactor, in Hanford, Washington, the first industrial-sized nuclear reactor for the purposes of material production, which was completed in March 1945. B Reactor produced the fissile material for the plutonium weapons used during World War II.
Fission Bomb Assembly Methods
The ‘nuclear’ scientists eventually came up with two basic assembly methods for constructing a fission bomb, the Gun-type assembly and the Implosion-type assembly.
The Gun-type utilized Uranium 235 as the fissile material and the Implosion-type utilized Plutonium fissile material, although the Implosion process could also utilize enriched Uranium.
Gun-type Assembly Method
The Gun-type assembly utilized a gun mechanism in the bomb that would fire one piece of U-235 at another piece, which would cause a nuclear reaction and immediate explosion.
Sounds plausible doesn’t it?
Below is a cross section drawing of the proposed nuclear bomb:
According to the underpaid US scientists in 1945 the atomic bomb above exploded (!), when the 9 projectile rings (item S above) of 30.5 kg uranium-235 (U-235) were mechanically pushed over and mechanically compressed into (?) the 6 target rings (item H above) also of 30.5 kg uranium-235 (U-235) by the projectile Tungsten-Carbide disk (item T) at a speed of >1.000 m/s (according #20 of the Los Alamos Primer) and the projectile steel back (item U) in turn accelerated by exploding cordite power bags (item W). 4 Polonium-Beryllium initiators (item G) on the plug crushed by the projectile rings apparently started the magic atomic action (LOL!)?
So an atomic bomb is very simple! Slide or drop or push (assisted by exploding cordite!) uranium-235 (U-235) projectile rings over 6 uranium-235 (U-235) target rings and compress them together inside a Tungsten-Carbide tube (sleeve/disk/plug) a speed of >1.000 m/s and fission occurs and … BOOM.
The above theory is evidently pure nonsense. Stupid, idiotic propaganda. It does not work! Metal in contact with metal, be it gold, silver, lead, iron, uranium of any kind incl. uranium-235 (U-235) of any critical mass, does not fission exponentially and explode (initiated by Polonium-Beryllium) even after being mechanically compressed together at a speed of >1.000 m/s … suddenly.
What is supposed to happen to initiate fission? The projectile rings and their steel back (items T and U) – say weight 50 kgs – accelerate down the 2 meters long tube in microseconds and collide with the impact absorbing anvil (item E) with a velocity of v – say v = 150 m/s, which is pretty high (more will blow the tube apart).
The total energy applied at collision impact is 562.5 kJ and half of it is absorbed by the impact absorbing anvil (item E) trying to push the projectile rings and its steel back (item U) back up the tube. You know – objects also bounce, not just compress, at impacts. The remaining energy – 281.25 kJ – is supposed to radially compress mechanically the projectile rings and the target rings (total 61 kg) and adjacent items (say also 61 kg) but 2.3 kJ/kg energy will not compress metal a lot in any direction.
You really have to wonder what idiot or nuclear physicist came up with this crazy idea that two pieces of cold metal (uranium-235) mechanically compressed together using cordite would start to fission. Would the two cold metal pieces really merge into one? What really happens at the contact surface between the projectile rings and the target rings? Do the rings become one solid mass? And why would it explode?
The Critical Mass Theory
Of course, the ‘experts’ have an answer to that. Critical mass! The critical mass is the smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction. For uranium-235, U-235, the critical mass is 61 kg! If 30.5 kg of metal U-235 projectile rings are brought in mechanical, compressive contact with 30.5 kg of metal U-235 target rings they add up to 61 kg =critical mass! A 3.39 kg projectile ring in contact with a 5.08 kg target ring does not produce fission! Why? Because 3.39 + 5.08 = 8.47 kg is not a critical mass! On the other hand, according to the ‘experts’, a sphere or ball of uranium-235 with diameter 17 cm has a critical mass of only 52 kg.
Or: A mass may be exactly critical without being a perfect homogeneous sphere. More closely refining the shape toward a perfect sphere will make the mass supercritical. Conversely changing the shape to a less perfect sphere will decrease its reactivity and make it subcritical.
So a 52 kg sphere of uranium-235 is a critical mass like 61 kg of rings of uranium-235. atomic physics is just a big laugh. Military secret, of course.
In retrospect it would have been much easier to allow two 26 kg half-spheres of uranium-235 to collide than to play around with projectile and target rings. And what damages are caused by cordite gases when the projectile rings or half-spheres have been pushed down the gun tube? Doesn’t the whole A-bomb assembly blow apart? OK, OK, it was never built! It was just a joke. Military propaganda 1945 worth US$ 2 billion! And ‘nuclear’ physicists believe it 2016.”(1)
Implosion-type Assembly Method
As always happens with these ‘scientifically’ created hoaxes, the next step was to create a more technically complicated assembly using ‘smoke and mirrors’, that, of course, would serve to be more efficient and compact.
A second assembly method was based on the idea that a 360 degree compression of the fissile material would act to more efficient compression and allow the bomb to be reduced in size at the same time.
The implosion assembly utilizes explosive lenses surrounding a sub-critical sphere with a core of plutonium using chemical explosives to compress the core many times its original density (the “implosion” method).
In a nuclear weapon, an array of explosive lenses is used to change the several approximately spherical diverging detonation waves into a single spherical converging one. The converging wave is then used to collapse the various shells (tamper, reflector, pusher, etc.) and finally compresses the core (pit) of fissionable material to a prompt critical state.
The Nuclear Reactor
The fission generated in a nuclear reactor is a different story.
And has an actual scientific basis.
One U-235 uranium atom may fission, as discovered by Otto Hahn in the 1930’s. You do not have to mechanically compress uranium metal rings in a tube for it. In a peaceful atomic power plant there is no mechanic compression of uranium U-235 to keep the plant going.
When one U-235 nucleus fissions into two lighter nuclei fragments or products (i.e. other atoms), about 0.1 percent of the mass of the uranium nucleus appears as fission energy of 202.5 MeV.
In nuclear reactors, the fission fragment kinetic energy remains as low-temperature heat, which itself causes little or no ionization.
Slow and Fast Neutrons
“Fission depends on the energy of the neutrons
Nuclear fission can occur when a nucleus is rendered sufficiently unstable by the absorption of a passing neutron. The probability for such a fission reaction to take place depends on how energetic these neutrons are, and so the knowledge of their energies spectrum is vital for an understanding of how nuclear reactors work. The custom is to classify these neutrons in groups corresponding to their energy ranges, the most important of which are the ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ neutrons.”(2)
“After a series of collisions with different nuclei, the energy of neutrons produced by fission reactions drops to the order of a few electron-volts or a few fractions of an electron-volt. Neutrons with energies in this range are collectively referred to as ‘slow’, and neutrons whose energies match those of the surrounding atoms are known as ‘thermal’.
It is these slow neutrons that allow for nuclear reactors to run with fuel based on natural uranium or uranium lightly-enriched in fissile isotope 235. Without them, the most common pressurized (PWR) and boiling water (BWR) reactors would not operate. As a result, the neutrons emitted by nuclear fission have to be slowed down by collisions with a ‘moderating’ medium. Reactors based on natural uranium, which contains comparatively little of the enriched uranium 235, require the use of special moderators which absorb very few of the neutrons : such moderators are heavy water and pure graphite.
Before they are slowed down by a large number of nuclear collisions, neutrons produced by fission reactions are known as ‘fast’. They usually have energies between 0.1 and 2 or 3 MeV.
The fact that they possess a substantial amount of kinetic energy allows fast neutrons to fission more easily nuclei once they get captured. They can therefore split not only nuclei reputed fissile by slow neutrons, but also minor actinides, the heavy nuclei which build up inside nuclear fuel as radioactive waste. Fast neutrons are needed to eliminate these waste products.
The use of fast neutrons in so-called ‘fast reactors’ allows for the production of more fissile nuclei than are destroyed, as the absorption of at least one neutron per fission by an uranium 238 nucleus transforms this uranium 238 into a fissile plutonium 239 nucleus. This process is known as breeding, leading to an almost inexhaustible supply of nuclear fuel.
One drawback of fast neutrons in reactors is that the probabilities of their capture by nuclei are comparatively small. Traveling in matter, neutrons see nuclei as targets. The apparent cross-section of these targets is much more smaller for fast neutrons than it is for slower neutrons. As a result, an intense neutron flux and a fuel rich in fissile elements are both needed to compensate for this lower probability.
In a medium rich in hydrogen like water, the slowdown is much faster requiring much less collisions. This is reason for the use of a water moderator in conventional reactors, for which a rapid slowdown is needed.”(2)
“It is the speed of the neutron, when it hits the nucleus that has a lot to do with how likely a fission is to occur. One might think, intuitively, that if the neutron is going really fast that it has a better chance of “shattering” the nucleus, but that’s not really how it works. Actually, for the fissile nuclei such U-235 the SLOWER the neutron is going, the more probable fission is.
So slowed-down neutrons to maximize fission are an absolute requirement. And then from fission comes more neutrons, which continue the reaction. Well, mostly right. Actually, the neutrons born from fission are going really fast. Really, really fast. And they have to slow down to have a good chance of causing fission. That’s where the moderator comes in.
The moderator in a nuclear reactor is the material whose job it is to slow down neutrons without absorbing them. This slowing-down is done by neutrons bouncing off the nuclei of the atomics in the moderating material. For most reactors, moderation takes place in the water that also cools the reactor. For a high-temperature reactor like the liquid-fluoride reactor, graphite (carbon) is used as the moderator. This was not really known in the 1940’s when the atomic bomb was said to have been invented.
It is thus the moderated free neutrons that keep the fission going in a peaceful nuclear power reactor by heating the water. The 2 MeV kinetic energy of a free neutron becomes 0.01 MeV kinetic energy and the rest – 1.99 MeV – heats up the water.
And the hot water drives steam turbines to generate electricity.
So unlike nuclear bombs, nuclear generated power does exist…….but it’s an expensive way to boil water!
Nuclear Bomb Radiation
What about the radiation from the alleged bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
“According to the media about 70,000 persons died immediately at Hiroshima due to the a-bomb explosion in 1945 and another 70,000 persons died later due to radiation and poisoning by radioactive fall-out.
Over the decades the American and Japanese governments have spent more than $100 million to try to understand just what the radiation from the atomic bombs did to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Evidently during seven years of US occupation of Japan no real radiation studies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were done. The authorities just claimed that two a-bombs had exploded, that people were dying of radiation and anybody disagreeing, particularly the ‘Hibakusha’, the poor a-bomb survivors (a clever invention!), would be visited by the local yakusas to be told to shut up or they would be getting problems. So all Japanese just agreed with the 1945 a-bomb nonsense to carry on peacefully.
No big deal actually. Japan became quickly an economic super power. But normal people were scared for ever of this mysterious radiation.
The big deal was the fire-bombing of both cities along with 60+ other cities in Japan, which targeted civilian populations and not military targets.
Can you say terrorism and genocide?
And guess what napalm fire-bombing causes………lot’s of burn victims, which is what we are told are radiation burned victims.
Napalm burns are horrendous burns since the burning napalm gel sticks to the clothes and skin increasing the burn damage.
Don’t be fooled by the photos….yes the people are burned…..but not from a nuclear explosion.
Atomic Bomb Testing
Just a reminder here:
The Trinity Test
“Trinity was the code name of the first detonation of a nuclear weapon, conducted by the United States Army on July 16, 1945, 5:29 am 45 seconds as part of the Manhattan Project.
The test was conducted in the Jornada del Muerto desert about 35 miles (56 km) southeast of Socorro, New Mexico, on what was then the USAF Alamogordo Bombing and Gunnery Range (now part of White Sands Missile Range).
The only structures originally in the vicinity were the McDonald Ranch House and its ancillary buildings, which scientists used as a laboratory for testing bomb components.
The test was of an implosion-design plutonium device, informally nicknamed “The Gadget”, of the same design as the Fat Man bomb later detonated over Nagasaki, Japan, on August 9, 1945. The complexity of the design required a major effort from the Los Alamos Laboratory, and concerns about whether it would work led to a decision to conduct the first nuclear test.
Below is a photo of the Fat Man bomb that was used in Nagasaki 24 days after the gadget was detonated:
There were several reasons for not testing a Little Boy type of device. Primarily, there was little uranium-235 as compared with the relatively large amount of plutonium which, it was expected, could be produced by the Hanford Site reactors.Additionally, the weapon design was simple enough that it was only deemed necessary to do laboratory tests with the gun-type assembly. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work.(3)
By the time it [Jumbo] arrived, the reactors at Hanford produced plutonium in quantity, and Oppenheimer was confident that there would be enough for a second test.
Back to the supposed ‘real’ nuclear Trinity test:
***A Note About Atomic Explosions and Mushroom Clouds!***
An atomic explosion is allegedly, according to ‘nuclear’ physicists, only fission (see above).
But these same physicists also claim that this pure energy from fission becomes within nano-seconds:
A FLASH of extremely bright light, traveling at the speed of light 299.792.458 m/s blinding any viewers/the enemy but apparently not producing any shadows on films of such events.
A deadly SHOCK WAVE full of radioactive particles/split atoms felt as a noisy air/blast pressure increase >1 000 bar moving at supersonic velocity say >100.000 m/s into the stationary atmosphere, that blows away the viewers/enemies and destroys everything but also shakes the ground like an earthquake with noise traveling at only 330 m/s in air.
A terrible FIREBALL of the released energy, with HEAT (very high temperature >1 000 000° K) expanding at say only 10.000 m/s velocity into the surrounding cold air vaporizing viewers/enemies, unless they were blown away by the initial shock wave, heating up the air, so it glows and the ground below it melts and starting fires.
A dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD (???) consisting of hot dirty smoke in cold, clean air and which is full of RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES. These radioactive particles then fall out of the mushroom cloud, or out of the dispersing cloud of particles blown by the winds thus becoming FALLOUT that gives off invisible, gamma ray radiation killing people still alive inhaling them.
Followed by (sometimes):
A CRATER at Ground Zero.
If you do not die at once by the flash, shock wave, heat, radiation and fireball, you will no doubt die by inhaling the fallout later. Unless you dropped below a table with a wet towel around your nose and mouth.
A-bomb mushroom clouds are pseudoscience!
In order for the mushroom cloud to rise into the sky – and to be photographed as evidence of an atomic explosion – violent winds are supposed to blow from the point of atomic burst, etc, etc. Only fools believe this nonsense. All the energy of the alleged atomic explosion is distributed in all directions as a heat/blast wave and there is no time for a mushroom cloud to be formed rising in the sky. Evidently air is sucked in after the explosion but it is also from all directions. Nuclear detonations produced high above the ground also do not create mushroom clouds! Nuclear detonations cannot take place at all as explained above!
There is no scientific, peer reviewed evidence that the effects of a ‘nuclear’ explosion above can happen. All is military, national security top secrets approved by nuclear experts. However, uncontrolled fission of atoms just produces heat that boils or melts the surroundings which then prevents further fission. Nuclear power plants have had these melt-downs.
Any atomic bomb would just melt before exploding.
A chemical explosive is a compound or mixture which, upon the application of heat or shock, decomposes or rearranges with extreme rapidity, yielding much gas and heat.
Chemical explosions normally take place at ground level and the gas forms a mushroom cloud rising in the sky after the explosion.
Any photograph or film of a supposed nuclear explosion, which isn’t a past-up, is guaranteed to be a chemical explosion similar to the TNT ‘test’ at the Trinity test site.
And any physicist suggesting a-bombs can explode is lying.
You can bet your life on it!
At the Trinity test, the photo below shows the soldiers watching from only six miles away. We know those soldiers were unprotected, since we have seen the photos. They are in fatigues.
If this blast had been real, that would have been a very bad idea:
“What a difference 3 kt makes, eh?
But there are even bigger problems with that photo from Trinity. Look closely at the soldiers. Why are the nearest soldiers in black shadow, while the ones just in front of them are shadowed in light gray? It makes no sense. The sun doesn’t cast a selective shadow. It is either black or gray, but not both. It’s a poor paste-up, to make it look like a lot of soldiers are there when they aren’t.”(3)
Below is the color photo of the Trinity test:
Why are the films of this quality:
Or of this quality:
On the Wikipedia Lookout Mountain page, we find this:
And after the fake blast:
Here’s another picture of ground zero:
Following are some photos of test sets used in nuclear ‘tests’:
And they left Iron Man sitting up….
And some quick thinking here:
Operation Sandstone was a series of ‘nuclear’ weapon tests in 1948. It was the third series of American tests, following Trinity in 1945 and Crossroads in 1946. Like the Crossroads tests, the Sandstone tests were carried out at the Pacific Proving Grounds, although at Enewetak Atoll rather than Bikini Atoll.
Here’s a paste-up of that ‘test’:
Operation Greenhouse was the fifth American nuclear test series, the second conducted in 1951 and the first to test principles that would lead to developing thermonuclear weapons (hydrogen bombs). Conducted at the new Pacific Proving Ground, specifically on islands of the Enewetak Atoll, all of the devices were mounted in large steel towers, to simulate air bursts.
If we go to the Wikipedia page for Enewetok, we find this photo:
Note that the caption (from photo subtext) says:
Filters are being removed from a US Air Force Boeing B-17 drone after a flight through the radioactive cloud.
Bikini Atoll Tests
Able and Baker Tests:
Here is Baker, 24 days later:
Now let’s look at the ships. The photo below is higher definition than many so zoom in to get a better look:
Here’s another picture of the Baker detonation:
So many problems there it is hard to know where to start. First of all, the spout doesn’t match the other spout. The spout here is larger at the bottom and tapers up; the other doesn’t. This spout is surrounded by white foam; the other isn’t. If you answer that this photo is a few seconds later, allowing these things to change and develop, then you have to answer this, too: How did the white cloud above get smaller? If this is a few seconds later, allowing the white foam below to develop, why hasn’t the vapor cloud above expanded? The top of the cloud, containing the broccoli shapes, has expanded, so why would the white vapor halo beneath that have contracted? They forgot to match the photos to one another.
Here’s a third photo of the Baker event, from the air:
Hydrogen Fake Bombs
In another successful plan to fool the public into believing in the nuclear bomb hoax, some of the bomb inventing ‘physicists’ came up with the hydrogen-fusion or thermonuclear bomb concept.
“A thermonuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon that [we are told] uses the energy from a primary nuclear fission reaction to compress and ignite a secondary nuclear fusion reaction. The result is greatly increased explosive power when compared to single-stage fission weapons. It is colloquially referred to as a hydrogen bomb or H-bomb because it employs fusion of isotopes of hydrogen.
As thermonuclear weapons [we are told] represent the most efficient design for weapon energy yield in weapons with yields above 50 kilotons of TNT (210 TJ), virtually all the nuclear weapons today are thermonuclear weapons.
The basic principle of the Teller–Ulam configuration is the idea that different parts of a thermonuclear weapon can be chained together in “stages”, with the detonation of each stage providing the energy to ignite the next stage. At a bare minimum, this implies a primary section that consists of an implosion-type fission bomb (a “trigger”), and a secondary section that consists of fusion fuel. The energy released by the primary compresses the secondary through a process called “radiation implosion”, at which point it is heated and undergoes nuclear fusion.(6)
“The hydrogen weapon – the h-bomb – is just an a-bomb in a box full of hydrogen isotopes (hydrogen atoms – deuterium and tritium – carrying one and two extra neutrons) in the shape of bits of solid metal, Hydrogen compounds, where the Hydrogen atom is replaced by its isotope.
When an A-bomb explodes only 1.5 to 2% of the Uranium or Plutonium atoms fission, while neutrons fly away, we are told, and described below. In an H-bomb the exploding A-bomb liberates the extra neutrons of the Hydrogen isotopes that fission the remaining 98.5 to 98% of the Uranium or Plutonium atoms in the A-bomb making it >50 times stronger, bla, bla. No nuclear fusion takes place of any kind, even if experts confusingly suggests the opposite:
The presumable (sic – it is secret!) structure of an h-bomb is as follows: at its center is an atomic bomb; surrounding it is a layer of lithium deuteride (a compound of lithium and deuterium, the isotope of Hydrogen with mass number 2); around it is a tamper, a thick outer layer, frequently of fissionable material, that holds the contents together in order to obtain a larger explosion. Neutrons from the atomic explosion cause the lithium to fission into helium, tritium (the isotope of hydrogen with mass number 3), and energy. The atomic explosion also supplies the temperatures needed for the subsequent fusion of deuterium with tritium, and of tritium with tritium (50,000,000°C and 400,000,000°C, respectively). Enough neutrons are produced in the fusion reactions to produce further fission in the core and to initiate fission in the tamper.
Imagine 400 000 000°C temperature. During some nano-seconds! Why Hydrogen isotopes fuse is not really clear, as usual. Only extra neutrons of the Hydrogen atoms of the metal compound are released to fission the Uranium or plutonium atoms of the A-bomb. But as every A-bomb does not work, all H-bombs likewise are clever, pseudo-scientific propaganda.
The magic H-bomb is so strong, it cannot be dropped by a plane – since the plane will be destroyed Kamikaze style at the explosion – so the ‘physicists’ suggest it arrives by ICBMs – Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles – at a speed >7,000 m/s but … it is nonsense.”(7)
The ICBM hoax is a topic for another post….
Anyway, H-Bombs are fake, just like A-Bombs.
What a surprise!
Russia Has No Nuclear Bombs
“The US (fake) first atomic test bomb exploded in New Mexico 16 July 1945, we are told, and president Truman was informed, we are told, who indicated to USSR dictator Stalin 24 July 1945 at Potsdam, Germany, that USA had a new weapon.
Two days later 26 July 1945 US, UK and US puppet CKS/China but not USSR agreed and published a Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender (the Potsdam proclamation).
The alternative for Japan was not the a-bomb! It was secret. But USA didn’t await any response from Japan to this proclamation. Three weeks later the fake a-bombs were brought into action. Why not? USA had invested a lot in this nonsense.
Klaus Fuchs had already 1 July 1945 told his USSR spy masters about the US test of the (fake) bomb so Stalin and/or his deputy Beria was in the picture.
Klaus Fuchs was a German engineer, physicist and communist born 1911 at Kiel that escaped from Nazi Germany and studied and worked in Great Britain in the 1930’s. He was 1942 persuaded to work as a civilian for the US Manhattan project together with 12 Nobel Prize winners to develop the (fake) a-bomb in UK, Canada and at Los Alamos, NM, USA and to sign the declaration form of the Official Secrets Act that provides for the protection of state secrets and official information, mainly related to national security. Poor Fuchs could therefore not tell anybody what he was doing.
Fuchs apparently soon found out that the Manhattan project was just propaganda (young engineers like him writing science fiction papers or screwing together something looking like a bomb) … but he could not tell anybody. National security! Crazy, wasn’t it. So Klaus told the stupid secret about the a-bomb that didn’t work to some representatives of the USSR, so that they knew what was going on. He shouldn’t have done that. 1950 Fuchs was arrested and jailed, later condemned to 14 years prison for treason after a 90 minutes trial in the UK. Tough luck. 9 years later he was kicked out of UK and settled at Dresden. The Fuchs’ arrest and trial and the Rosenbergs’ executions were clear signs to any civilian physicist in the know that a-bombs do not work – shut up or … .
Two more (fake) US a-bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan on the 6th and 9th of August.
Back in Moscow Stalin or Beria created, 20 August 1945, a secret committee to produce a Soviet ‘atomic’ bomb, fake of course, as quickly as possible. The committee consisted of three communist gangsters, Malenkov, Voznessenski and Zaveniaguine and three corrupt scientists, Kurtchatov, Joffé and Kapitsa. Kapitsa had already, 11 October 1941, written an article in Pravda about how to build an a-bomb that could wipe out a city, so it was not news. The committee also got, 11 October 1945, a full set of plans of the US (fake) bomb provided by Fuchs so it was just to copy and paste and … voilà – the USSR would have its (fake) bomb at little cost.
And the rest is history with the USSR/Russia and the US pretending to have a draw with Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)……..isn’t that clever?……..and both using the big lie to control their own populace, channel lots of tax monies to black projects and keep the rest of the ignorant countries in line with the threat of annihilation.
There is no business like the fake nuke business. It goes full speed 2016! Iran and North Korea are in the lead!
“The significance of the a-bomb for military purposes is crystal clear according the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (Public Law 585, 79th Congress).
The US Atomic Energy Act of 1946, e.g. Sec. 10. (b) Restrictions. (1), (and its revisions) charges the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and later the US Department of Energy (DoE), with regulating restricted data wherever it appears and wherever it comes from, i.e. control of information.
In plain language – censorship! The restricted data clauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens.
Thus nuclear weapons information or propaganda is born secret according to the US law. The US authorities and public don’t have any choice in the matter in 2016. Therefore all information that A-bombs are fake is effectively censored in the USA.
It must be kept secret! And vague!
Though large quantities of vague data have been officially released, and larger quantities of vague data have been unofficially leaked by former bomb designers, most public descriptions of nuclear weapon design details rely to some degree on speculation, reverse engineering from known information, or comparison with similar fields of physics (inertial confinement fusion is the primary example).
It worked beautifully in Japan 1945-1953 as Japan was occupied by the USA applying strict, military censorship there, so it was illegal to question the a-bombings in 1945. You were arrested, jailed and even executed, if you said the a-bombings of Japan were just propaganda and that there were no evidences they had taken place.
And the hoax works today 71 years later by keeping plenty silly, unintelligent and opportunistic people occupied everywhere. It (the a-bomb) is a criminal threat. Terrorists may use them!
And thus the following statements are repeated constantly to terrorize the public:
The threats from nuclear … weapons are real. The possibility that terrorists might acquire and use nuclear weapons is an urgent and potentially catastrophic challenge to global security.
Understanding the Nuclear Weapons Threat – While it has been more than twenty years since the end of the Cold War, the existence of thousands of nuclear weapons continues to pose a serious global threat.”(7)
Political Implications of ‘Nuclear’ Weapons
“The political implications of the a-bomb being a hoax are really not enormous apart from being funny and comical and I cannot understand why media cannot report it. Except that it is forbidden by a US law!
It means only that the USA (presidents Roosevelt/Truman) successfully cheated the world at the end of WW2 with the USSR, UK, France, Israel, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea joining in later. Just laugh about it.
The “treason” of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg was probably part of the US show and they were not executed but given new identities.
The Israeli whistle-blower Vanunu is also part of the show by “exposing” Israel’s nuclear arms program when no such program exists.
Israel stating that it is concerned about a possible Iranian nuclear bomb is also pure a-bomb showbiz, knowing that no such bomb has ever been and cannot be built.
The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 was also a total fake with both Khrushchev and Kennedy cynically aware that they were engaged in a bogus argument about non-existent a-bombs. They had however just a little earlier decided to start the fake space race with cosmos clown Gagarin 1961 flying around the Earth in less than 120 minutes!
Many people cannot believe how easy it is to fake the whole a-bomb story: just keep the details secret and keep you scared via media.”(7)
A parting shot (the devil’s in the details):
(3) The Nuclear Hoax
(7) The A-Bomb Hoax