The post titled Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols) presented clear evidence that the trails left by jets are not condensation trails.
These jet trails are, in fact, aerosols containing various chemicals, metals and particulate matter.
“Our society is taught and conditioned to accept the dictates and opinions of the so called “experts” without questioning their conclusions. In so many circles of academia honesty and morality has long since been abandoned in exchange for a paycheck and a pension. When one branch or group of the science community completely contradicts another group from the same field of study, shouldn’t that be a glaring red flag? Nowhere do we have a more egregious and criminally negligent example than with the climate science community’s complete denial of the climate engineering issue and its overall effect on the planetary thermostat.
“While the vast majority of climatologists/scientists and governments around the globe are either “investigating” or pushing for global geoengineering/solar radiation management to be deployed for global warming “mitigation” (as if geoengineering has not been going on for over 70 years already), other camps in the science community have long since confirmed that jet traffic and “contrails” (sprayed particulate trails) are actually a major contributor to global warming.
“The grand deception is this…….all available data proves beyond reasonable doubt that the trails being used to blot out the sun and alter the weather around the globe are intentionally sprayed (and highly toxic) particulate trails that are the direct result of ongoing covert climate engineering programs. The closest the climate science community has come to telling the truth is to admit that “contrails” (sprayed particulate trails) may be causing “accidental” geoengineering.
“Sample articles are below which confirm the overall warming effect that is caused from jet aircraft traffic and “contrails”:
“ScienceShot: Jet Contrails a Big Global Warmer” (Science magazine)
“Airplane contrails and their effect on temperatures” (Christian Science Monitor)
“The Contrail Effect” (From NOVA and PBS)
“Jet Contrails Actually Do Alter The Weather” ( Discovery Magazine)
“Flying Further To Avoid Jet Contrails Might Help With Global Warming” (Popular Science)
“Airplane Contrails Boost Global Warming” (National Geographic)
“How is it possible that we live in a “civilized world” in which such massive, obvious, and unimaginably destructive programs can be carried out in plain sight while the climate science community (and academia as whole) adamantly and criminally denies this verifiable reality?
“Climate engineering is weather warfare, nothing less. The highly toxic materials being used in the ongoing atmospheric aerosol spraying programs all settle down through the air column, this makes geoengineering a form of biological warfare as well. Unimaginable and irreparable decimation is being inflicted on the biosphere and the entire web of life by the ongoing climate modification SRM programs. How long can the insanity in our skies continue without the consequences to the Earth and the human race becoming total? Geoengineering programs are wreaking havoc on the planet from every direction, including being the primary driver of the ever increasing record droughts and forest fires.
“It must be understood that no peer reviewed science publications that openly admit to the ongoing geoengineering programs will be allowed by the power structure controlled institutions. The tentacles of this control are vast beyond true comprehension, penetrating and permeating every imaginable organization. This being said, many within these organizations (that have gone along with the insanity so far in order to safeguard their own financial interests) are beginning to realize they are also going to go down with the ship. Some are now whispering the truth in the shadows.
“The University of Michigan Department of Environmental Health Sciences has just published a Science study, “Assessing The Direct Occupational And Public Health Impacts Of Solar Radiation Management With Stratospheric Aerosols” (excerpts from this study later in this article).
This paper explores this information gap. Using available evidence, we describe the potential direct occupational and public health impacts of exposures to aerosols likely to be used for SRM, including environmental sulfates, black carbon, metallic aluminum, and aluminum oxide aerosols. We speculate on possible health impacts of exposure to one promising SRM material, barium titanate, using knowledge of similar nano materials.
Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment of stratospheric aerosols.
This paper will focus on SRM via stratospheric aerosol injection, and will describe potential direct human health impacts. We explore three knowledge gaps: 1) human exposures, 2) human health impacts, and 3) exposure limits. SRM may be expected to result in ecosystem damage and resulting human health effects through indirect mechanisms such as damage to, or contamination of, agricultural products and wildlife.
Sulfates and nanoparticles currently favored for SRM include sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, black carbon, and specially engineered discs composed of metallic aluminum, aluminum oxide and barium titanate.
Due to atmospheric circulation and gravitational deposition, large-scale population exposures to atmospherically-injected SRM materials will almost certainly occur after their deployment. Population exposures could also occur through ingestion of food and water contaminated with deposited particles, as well as transdermally. Unlike occupational exposures, there has been virtually no research done to estimate ground-level personal exposures to SRM materials…
No models appear to have estimated the potential global burden of environmental aluminum, alumina or barium titanate that might result from SRM.
… population exposures to SRM materials will be continuous and prolonged over months
to years… Thus the health effects will be primarily chronic in nature.
“Though this study does not openly admit to the fact that global climate engineering has been deployed for decades (with unquantifiable and catastrophic impacts), the study does address the obvious, inarguable, and horrific dangers in the most direct fashion I have yet seen from an institutional science publication.
“When studies like the one above are combined with the mountain of existing data (which prove atmospheric spraying and climate engineering have been going on for some 70 years), the dangers posed by the geoengineering/SRM elephant in the room become impossible to rationally deny. From historical US Senate studies, to half-century old presidential reports, to extensive patents lists and undeniable film footage of atmospheric spraying, proof of the ongoing climate engineering reality is there for any who do objective investigation.(2)