The Depopulation Agenda

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”. – Dr. Henry Kissinger

Depopulation has been utilized extensively throughout recorded history wherever it is written that large population groups were deliberately killed through violence or starvation.

PityOfWar071When resources were scarce the preferred option of conquerors was to kill the conquered.

When resources were abundant the conquerors would usually keep the conquered as slaves.

The Old Testament of the Christian bible, also known as the Jewish Torah, describes at great length the Israelites slaughter of every man, woman and child in town after town that they conquer. And this slaughter of every man, woman and child is stated as being commanded by the Jewish god Jehovah.

In essence what this describes is divinely inspired genocide or to use its current politically correct designation, depopulation, which sounds very clinical.

The word depopulate actually comes from the Latin, depopulatus, which means ‘to lay waste’, ‘to ravage, ruin’ a people, to reduce the population of a people, especially by violence, disease, etc.

There was always a eugenics element to this sort of genocide, in that the conquerors normally viewed the conquered as inferior, and so didn’t want to mix their ‘blood’ with ‘blood’ that would weaken their race.

The word eugenics actually comes from the Latin, Eugenius, meaning ‘well-born’, which, in a modern scientific sense, has taken on the meaning of being the movement devoted to improving the human species through the control of hereditary factors in mating.

Photo_Measuring_Babies“Eugenics is a social and scientific movement that seeks to replace natural selection with scientific selection. Eugenics is all about healthy, intelligent children and parental responsibility to future generations. The basic principle is that which has been successfully applied by animal breeders for millennia: like breeds like–at least usually, if not always.(1)
 
Once the continuity of humankind with the rest of the animal kingdom was established, invigorated attempts to improve the human genome became inevitable. Eugenics is, after all, quite simply, applied human genetics. Five of the first six presidents of the American Society of Human Genetics were also members of the board of directors of the American Eugenics Society. Historically, modern genetics is an offshoot of the eugenics movement, not the reverse.
 
At its root, eugenics is an interdisciplinary conceptualization of the genetic consequences of social practices for current and future humans. Human ecology does not limit itself to the present population but defines society as the entire human community over time; we should act as nature’s stewards, and simple parental responsibility mandates self-restraint. Thus modern eugenics goes hand in hand with neo-Malthusian thinking, which views the current global population as already exceeding the planet’s long-term carrying capacity.
 
Blausen_0060_AssistedReproductiveTechnology

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Positive eugenics refers to approaches intended to raise fertility among the genetically advantaged. These include such genetic techniques as in-vitro fertilization, egg transplants, and cloning ̧ and also ways to encourage use of those techniques, for example, targeted demographic analyses and financial and political stimuli. Pro-natalist countries (that is, those that wish to stimulate their birth rates) already engage in moderate forms of positive eugenics.
 
Negative eugenics, which is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged, largely fits under the rubric of family planning and genetic counseling. This includes contraception, abortions, and sterilization. To ensure that such services are available to all on a nondiscriminatory basis, it is advocated that, at a minimum, persons with low income receive such services, free of charge.
 
Genetic engineering, which was unknown to early eugenicists, consists of active intervention in the germ line without necessarily encouraging or discouraging reproduction of advantaged or disadvantaged individuals. It will allow people to have their own biological children without passing on their most problematic genes.
 
National family policy provides a good illustration of how a eugenics policy might be implemented. A government can opt either to offer subsidized day care to all women, permitting those wishing to work the opportunity to pursue their careers (according to eugenicists, a praiseworthy approach), or it can subsidize only poor women, many of whom are thus encouraged to view childbearing as a source of income (according to eugenicists, a dysgenic approach).
 
migrants-continue-arrive-hungaryAnother example is presented by the starkly different positions of the U.S. and Canadian governments on immigration. The United States imports the underclass of other countries to do jobs Americans don’t want to do, while Canada, whose immigrants are easily just as ethnically diverse as are America’s, rates immigration applicants according to educational levels and skills, which correlate highly with intelligence.
 
Simultaneous with and analogous to China’s Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, an ideological upheaval arrived in America as a denial of Darwinism, declaring eugenics to be the ideology of Holocaust. As the timeline demonstrates, for Jews, who had practiced eugenics for millennia, it was a repudiation of their own history.
 
The squandering of a group’s genetic patrimony is not by any means an exclusively Jewish affliction. Humankind’s elites are generally disappearing. Economists study human fertility in terms of cost-benefit analysis. Children are no longer the economic advantage they once were when the economy centered around agriculture.
 
As opposed to its two universalist heresies–Christianity and Islam–traditional Judaism is an explicitly tribalist religion, but as Jews left the ghetto and were subsumed by modern secular culture, they attempted to reconcile tribalism with universalism, creating an internal tension which still rives Jewry today. The resolution of this tension was found in America in the 1960s and 1970s in the form of ‘multiculturalism.’
 
 
 
2015-01-17-HeschelandKingatSelma-thumb

————Marching from Selma—————- ———Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (center)——– Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (2nd from right)

The period witnessed a confluence of three major ideology-forming strivings for Jews: the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement, and the Holocaust Memorial Movement. Jews defended blacks in Selma and Little Rock and battled the police at the Chicago Democratic Convention, but it was the visual images of heaped-up corpses (from cholera and starvation inducing allied bombing) discovered in German concentration camps a quarter century earlier that most keenly triggered their protest. The result was anger, ‘radicalization’, and the pursuit of poorly compatible goals. The Holocaust had been seared into their collective memory, and they were determined at all cost to avoid the role of outsiders confronted with a unified native and hostile ethos. Thus they supported open borders, which would make them one minority group of many, even as they fiercely defended the right of the Zionist state to take precisely the opposite tack.

 No group of people has exemplified this desire for pure, untainted ‘blood’, more the the Jewish people, due to their supposed ‘chosen’ status, as declared by their god, Jehovah.
 
An important barrier to outsider infiltration into the genome was the establishment of the matriline as the determinator of Jewishness. (While there can always be doubts as to paternity, maternity is tough to simulate.)
 
330px-NAACP_leaders_with_poster_NYWTS

Herbert Hill (second from right), labor director of NAACP, with Thurgood Marshall (second from left)

It was the late 1960s that married–in the public mind–eugenics to racial hostility. Outraged over prejudice and hostility, Jews sought out fellow victims for sympathy and support, and Afro-Americans had certainly been victimized, by any standards. ‘Negro’ civil-rights organizations were Jewish-funded and even Jewish-staffed. Over and over the media repeated the word ‘racism’ in conjunction with ‘anti-Semitism.’ Even as their parents fled the cities, young Jewish radicals marched in Alabama and Little Rock. It was really quite idealistic.
 
But there was an understandable psychological need to understand what motivated the foe.
 
And that slot was filled when the phraseology was expanded to ‘racism, anti-Semitism, and… eugenics.’ No matter that the majority of eugenicists had publicly decried such hostilities and prejudices.
 
And since anti-Semitism was mentioned, let’s take a look at this concocted word.
 
anti-semitismAbsurd terminology is a reliable barometer of muddled and emotional thinking, and any serious reexamination of Jewish eugenics requires a reconstitution of vocabulary. The word ‘anti-Semite,’ for example, still hangs on as an anachronistic coinage of late nineteenth-century racial taxonomy, referring not only to Jews, but also to Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Arabs. Semites were supposedly the offspring of Shem, one of Noah‟s three sons. Historical maps printed at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries show the southern shores of the Mediterranean as settled by ‘Semites’ while areas north of the Mediterranean are indicated as inherited by ‘Aryans.’ The mythology is no longer taken seriously, although in all fairness it must be conceded that the Semitic
languages are recognized as a distinct linguistic family.
 
Thus, even though the concept ‘Semite’ has been debunked as mythology, ‘anti-Semites’ continue to populate the writings of even serious scholars. One could with equal success employ the term ‘anti-unicornism.’ Still more quixotically, the ‘Semite’ component of ‘anti-Semite’ does not refer to ‘Semites,’ but only to Jews. Lastly, at least some Ashkenazi roots reach back, not to Palestine, but to Khazaria, so that calling the Jews ‘Semites’ is nothing less than nonsense all around.
 
Iran-Cartoon-208x300‘Anti-Semitic’ is now universally used to mean ‘anti-Jewish,’ but its lack of etymological coherence becomes especially evident, not in the adjective, but in the noun. If one substitutes ‘Semite’ with ‘Jew,’ the result is the hilarious neologism =’Anti-Jew.’ And what is the proper terminology when the ‘anti-Semite’ is, say, an Arab, that is, a ‘Semite’? A ‘self-hater’?
 
The reason the word has persevered for so long is that its vagueness conflates hostility toward Jews with criticism of Jews, presenting a huge barrier to objective analysis. Thus, vocabulary predetermines not only the categories in which we think, but even the range of permitted topics.
Even though the term is a patent absurdity, it has a long history behind it that will allow it to cling to existence for at least a while longer.
 
Actually, the code word for eugenics has now been chosen. A search that troubled many a scholar has produced a startlingly simple result… ‘genetics.’ Even a brief perusal of Ha’aretz, Forward, or Jewish Week produces glowing recommendations of genetic procedures that are pure eugenics.”(1)
 

Zionism

genocidal-ben-gurion“Zionism (Hebrew: צִיּוֹנוּת Tsiyyonut IPA: [t͡sijo̞ˈnut] after Zion) is a nationalist political movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel (roughly corresponding to Palestine, Canaan or the Holy Land). Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in central and eastern Europe as a national revival movement, in reaction to anti-Semitic (?) and exclusionary nationalist movements in Europe. Soon after this, most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.(2)
 
Until 1948, the primary goals of Zionism were the re-establishment of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel, ingathering of the exiles, and liberation of Jews from the antisemitic discrimination and persecution that they experienced during their diaspora.
 
A religious variety of Zionism supports Jews upholding their Jewish identity defined as adherence to religious Judaism, opposes the assimilation of Jews into other societies, and has advocated the return of Jews to Israel as a means for Jews to be a majority nation in their own state.
 
25s1pwwZionism was established with the political goal of creating a Jewish state in order to create a nation where Jews could be the majority, rather than the minority they were in a variety of nations in the diaspora.”(2)
 
And this Jewish state was and is being created through the application of racism, eugenics, exclusion, colonialism and genocidal depopulation, which just so happen to be the actions that have been condemned so vociferously by the Zionist Jewish leaders who formulated and executed the plan to create a Jewish State in order to be free of those same actions being perpetrated against the Jewish people.
 
The actions taken by the Zionist leaders of the Jewish State of Israel provide a perfect example of the application of negative eugenics and negative depopulation applied directly to a large group of people against their will.
 
Shrinking-Palestine-1024x724At the same time, those same Zionist leaders believe they are taking the best action possible to advance the population and eugenics goals for the Jewish people.
 
As it happens this is a perfect microcosm of the greater global plan of population and eugenics control that is being carried out now by the same financier/oligarchs who are bankrolling and directing the process in the Jewish State of Israel.
 

The Popular Image of Eugenics

Capture“In the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum‟s exhibit ‘Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race,’ curator Susan Bachrach maintains that eugenics “culminated” in the Holocaust. And even though most people would be unable to provide a definition of eugenics, they nevertheless generally concur with Bachrach, who represents an institution that, according to its official Web site, ‘teaches millions of people each year,’ and there are at least sixty-two other Holocaust museums in addition.(1)
 
Capture2But even this outreach is dwarfed by mass media that in their totality reach audiences numbering in the billions–and this on a daily basis. A Yahoo search for ‘eugenics’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ produced 311,000 items. A Google search for ‘holocaust+eugenics’ produced a lengthy series of Web sites, the first of which (the most widely read) began with the sentence ‘Probably one of the most hideous aspects of the Third Reich was their notorious fascination and experimentation with Eugenics.’
 
The first sentence of the second item reads that ‘The eugenics movement… was the forerunner of the Holocaust.’
 
The third item was a review of the above-mentioned eugenics exhibit at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., making little distinction between German racial hygiene laws and eugenics and characterizing them as ‘diabolical’.
 
That hereditarian thought was on occasion viciously distorted is not open to dispute, but to present it solely as an instrument of the Holocaust is a grotesque falsification. The following passage from Rabbi George Benedict‟s 1926 Mother‟s Day Sermon at Temple Emanu-El, Roanoke, Virginia, presents a far different image of the eugenics movement than one might expect on the basis of the above:
 
orthodox-jews-2And what but eugenic development of the race of Israel, whom, according to the conception of Moses, God had chosen to be a pattern to mankind as a nation consecrated to holiness, is the prime intent beneath every one of the laws of Moses? Whether regarded hygienically, morally, or religiously, the whole purport of the Torah, the Law of Moses, is to separate Israel from the rest of mankind as a Chosen People, in order to be a noble people, a well-born race of men for their own superior happiness, as well as, by way of example, to be a blessing to the world.
 
A current version of Jewish eugenics is to be found on the Web site of the Chicago Center for Jewish Genetic Disorders:
 
Kapparot-chickenslaughter-YomKippur14Dor Yeshorim [‘Upright Generations’ in Hebrew] is an international, confidential genetic screening system used mainly by Orthodox Jews, which attempts to prevent the transmission of genetic disorders that have an increased frequency among members of the Ashkenazi Jewish community. The system was established to follow Jewish law, under which abortion is not allowed, while acknowledging that testing might prevent the birth of an affected child. Designed in the early 1980s by an Orthodox rabbi, the system tests young adults before they begin to contemplate marriage. Participants can then use the system to learn their genetic compatibility with potential marital partners.
 
Eugenics–inadvertent and explicit, historical and current–lies at the very core of Jewish identity. Jewish eugenics cannot be understood as standing apart from human eugenics.
 
By the 1930s a global consensus of support had been achieved for eugenics, especially among
physicians, including German physicians. (If Jews made up 1.2% of the Reich population, in 1925 they constituted 0.9%, and by 1933 the figure had been reduced to a mere 0.76%. But in large cities such as Berlin, Frankfurt, and Hamburg as many as 30% to 40% of the doctors were Jewish.
 
ADN_animationBut, beginning in the late 1960s, eugenics with its focus on the selectionary consequences of differential fertility was declared beyond the pale, replaced by its own offspring–the natural science of genetics, and also demography with its modern reluctance to probe further than ‘total fertility.’ Indeed, why differentiate if genetic variance in human populations is preordained to be inconsequential? Physical anthropology came to be viewed as a poor second to cultural anthropology, with sociology, criminology, and pedagogy following in lock step, and the arts–as always–bringing up the rear.
 
Contrary to claims advanced by eugenics foes, Hitler’s position on such topics was not a bone of contention vis-à-vis his American and British World War II foes. His arch-nemisis Winston Churchill, Churchill, was an ardent eugenicist.
 
 
25645In 1904, the Conservative government of Arthur Balfour had established a Royal Commission “On the Care and Control of the Feeble-minded,” which reported to the Liberal government and recommended compulsory detention and sterilization of the unfit. In 1912 Balfour had personally addressed the First Eugenics Conference in London, which was attended by then Home Secretary Winston Churchill, who called for ‘a simple surgical operation (sterilization) so the inferior could be permitted freely in the world without causing much inconvenience to others.’ In 1910, Churchill had asked the civil service to investigate implementation of the Indiana law on sterilization.
 
Even earlier, in 1899, he had written to his cousin Ivor Guest: ‘The improvement of the British breed is my aim in life.’ The poet Wilfrid Scawen Blunt (1840-1922) wrote in his diary:
 
330px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-14059-0005,_Potsdamer_Konferenz,_Winston_ChurchillWinston is also a strong eugenist. He told us he had himself drafted the [Mental Deficiency] Bill which is to give power of shutting up people of weak intellect and so prevent their breeding. He thought it might be arranged to sterilise them.
 
In 1937, pressed by William Peel (1867-1937), head of the Palestine Royal Commission, that Britain “might have some compunction if she felt she was downing the Arabs year after year when they wanted to remain in their own country,” Churchill showed himself to be not only a supporter of eugenics, but of the rankest ‘racial hygiene’ as well:
 
I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit, for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to those people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race, or, at any rate, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.
 
The timeline of Jewish eugenics demonstrates beyond doubt that Jews were welcome, active participants in the eugenics movement and that Jews even today are still in the vanguard of a eugenic worldview, a fact entirely unknown to most people.
 
Eugenics is now viewed by many in the United States largely through the lens of the Holocaust and is to such a degree awash with understandably raw emotion as to quash any cries of protest. The upshot of the situation is that a group of largely Jewish activists have so successfully undermined the very eugenic mechanism that made Jewry what it is as to pose an existential threat to Jewry. But Jewish common sense, plain and old-fashioned as chicken soup, has not only continued to hold sway
in the practice of eugenics, it has even managed to surf the scientific tide of newly found genetic knowledge–all the while paying lip service to the Holocaust-from-eugenics gospel!
 

Take a look a the following video on Holocaust ‘facts’:

 
 
 
Unlike the U.S. situation, this anti-eugenics view never even got off the ground in Israel. Behavioral scientist Aviad Raz (b. 1968) of Ben Gurion University is quite open in pointing out that both the word ‘eugenics‟’and the actual practice of eugenics enjoy broad approval in that country, and objections to eugenics–at least as far as genetic screening combined with eugenic abortions–are a ‘non-issue’ in Israel:
 
Eugenic ideologies and practices have persisted in Israel, in a thinly disguised mode, even after the holocaust, because they were an inherent and formative part of Zionism….For many of the above mentioned respondents, prenatal genetic testing was eugenic and was indeed supported precisely for that reason, since ‘eugenic’ for them meant the improvement of the health of progeny and carried positive rather than negative connotations.
 
Zionist and eugenicist Ludwig Gumplowicz (1838-1909) writes in Racial Struggle that a stronger people enslaves a weaker people and takes over its land:
 
How does this amalgamation come about? Only in eternal racial struggle, in war and ‘peace’–there is no other way. Man would have to cease being human, he would have to–if it were only possible shuffle off everything that nature had made of him.
 
Jewish-Austrian journalist Nathan Birnbaum, who coined the words ‘Zionism’ and ‘Zionist,’ maintains that “the secure foundation of nationality is always and everywhere race.”
 
330px-Flag_of_the_United_Nations_(1945-1947).svgThe driving force behind the Holocaust Memorial Movement is not just grief over the tragedy of the past but also the desire to legitimize the Zionist state. In 1975, by a vote of 72 to 35, with 32 abstentions, the UN General Assembly declared that Zionism was “a form of racism and racial discrimination,” essentially declaring the State of Israel to be illegitimate. As a counterbalance, Jewish groups massively funded the Holocaust Memorial Movement. In its turn, the Holocaust Memorial Movement attacked the eugenics movement with ever increasing fury.
 
Even though eugenics is as cross-disciplinary a topic as is possible, encompassing anthropology, bioethics, ecology, genetics, history, philosophy, political science, religion, etc., for many it has been reduced to a branch of Jewish studies–’Holocaust.’
 
A multiplicity of views is obviously preferable to the straitjacket of an artificially imposed group cohesiveness, but history teaches that disproportionate political power inevitably seeks to transform scholarly discourse into a propaganda tool.
 
Adolf Hitler

Scapegoat

How, the reader must inevitably ask, has it come about that the fundamental pro-eugenics thrust–not just of Judaism and Zionism, but of Jewry in its essence and totality–has been so assiduously concealed, but that eugenics has been wed in the public consciousness to an infatuation with the topic on the part of a German political figure?
 
Maybe there’s a clue in this editorial from the American Hebrew:
 
Mixed marriages are not only a religious evil. That they are this, is very generally conceded. No one who has studied the question will maintain that the offspring of such marriages is apt to be of much value to Judaism. There will spring up among us a large class which will be neither Jews nor Gentiles,but a hybrid–useless for all purposes of further development. But the question involves ethnological and sociological problems also. The maintenance of the Jewish race purity has caused the preservation of Humanity’s present system of Semitic civilization.
The law of fittest surviving, aided by the breeding of hereditary qualities in a pure race, has given the Jews a physiological and mental superiority which can be perpetuated only by the perpetuation of the race purity.
 
Despite the urging of German eugenicists, no eugenics laws are passed in Germany during the Wilhelmine period. It is only in the strongly Jewish influenced Weimar Republic that eugenics enters
the popular consciousness and that such legislation begins to be proposed.
 
The Jewish attitude toward eugenics is truly paradoxical. We are dealing here with a disconnect between practice and theory. For lack of a proper understanding of the nature of eugenics as a world view, the rage has been directed at the word, so that a number of alternative terms have been proposed–’reproductive genetics,’ for example (as if such a beast as ‘non-reproductive genetics’ actually existed). It is like writing an encyclopedia article about horses without using the word ‘horse.'(1)
 
1013_rabbi-ovadia-yosef-300x300The reason a ‘paradoxical’ disconnect seems to exist is because the actual practice of eugenics is reserved for the ‘chosen’ Jewish population while the theory put forward for the rest of humanity is that eugenics is evil (think Holocaust) and should be avoided at all costs, which has the ultimate effect of degenerating all others races, enabling the ‘chosen’ to dominate and control the rest of humanity.
 
After all, the Jewish diaspora became painfully aware of the physical and mental (genetic/eugenic) problems that resulted from their tribe’s limited amount of procreation with the many people they lived among during hundreds of years. During this time they also witnessed the physical and mental degradation of those other cultures due to various multiracial mixing.

 

Population Control

Nathan-Rothschild-and-famed-quoteThe financier/oligarchs that currently control the financial system, became aware sometime before the Malthusian theories came on the scene, that they would lose their control of the geopolitical realms unless they found a way to keep the world population from exploding beyond a certain level. Not to mention the fact that they would also have to experience an increasing incursion of their fox hunting grounds.
 
 
 
What the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys want is to live a very comfortable feudal fiefdom existence with just enough serfs around them to take care of their needs and provide their entertainment, which according to current estimates is around 500 million to 2 billion people.
 
 
feudalism-then-and-now-hierarchy.jpg.w560h467
KWN-Fitzwilson-V-3292015
 
<<<<The chart above is close, except it skips those above the lackey Central Bankers.
 
Since the ranks of the financier/oligarchs were heavily populated by the same Zionists that were instrumental in the formation of a Jewish homeland, once they had control of the world economic system and they created a Jewish state, the next focus became decreasing world population, with a particular emphasis on any race other than the Jewish race.
 
Up to and including WW II, war had been the preferred method for culling large chunks of the population, since it enabled both the acquisition of new territory and new resources, while it also was good for business due to the fact that vast amounts of military equipment and armaments must be constantly replaced.
 
Yalta_summit_1945_with_Churchill,_Roosevelt,_StalinOnce the war was over, the allies divided up control of the defeated countries as well as the remaining countries that took no direct part in the war.
 
Taking advantage of the geopolitical disorder at the end of the war, the financier/oligarchs dream of creating a World Government organization, also came to fruition, when the United Nations was formed in 1945.
 
The United Nations Organization was created as a legitimate looking front that the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys could use to control economic, political and social systems throughout the world. Using economic control and their military power demonstrated during the war, the Allies eventually forced all nations to join the UN and submit to its edicts.
 
The_World_Bank_logo.svgThe primary method of control was shifted to economic manipulation through banking and the use of economic hitmen that would utilize loans and onerous debt to take over countries. The use of covert operations to acquire resources and capital was preferable to the use of violence, but if covert methods failed to get the results desired in a timely manner, then overt violence was used.
 
Seal_of_the_Central_Intelligence_Agency.svgThis economic manipulation worked quite well until the population of an indebted country reached the point where grass roots movements gained enough power to negatively impact the puppet government put in place by the economic hitmen and their CIA/MI6/KGB handlers.
 
An increasing population required the puppet government to focus more resources internally, which meant less available to send to the colonial powers, reducing the flow of wealth out of a country and into the bank accounts of the financier/oligarchs and their lackeys.
 
So the next important step was to reduce a countries population so that a minimum of resources were utilized by local populations, leaving the lion’s share for the colonial parasites.
 
“Unbeknown to the masses, governments have used covert methods to limit births in developed
and underdeveloped countries alike and to accelerate deaths in Africa and a few critically poor
and overpopulated areas elsewhere.
 
181016_10151542331488885_882312798_n-800x445Births have been prevented by interfering with the reproductive system so as to lower human
fertility, while deaths have been promoted by weakening the immune system so as to increase
morbidity and mortality.
The methods used by every country to control population growth have been dictated by the level
of development and the existing infrastructure as much as by political will or lack thereof and
have either been imposed by force and deception from the outside or adopted willingly by the
governing, military and scientific elites of nation states that have relied on the moral, technical
and monetary assistance of the United Nations, its agencies, and the greater international
community.
 
3-skeletonsRegardless of the methods used to control population and whether they are imposed or self-imposed, strict secrecy and deception have been necessary to prevent the masses from
discovering the bitter truth that for the past 68 years they have been the object of a silent and
global offensive, a campaign of attrition that has turned the basic elements of life into weapons of mass infertility and selective death.
 
Without our knowledge or consent, governments the world over have subverted our reproductive freedom and ability to procreate to achieve ambitious and necessary demographic objectives and in the process have committed the most odious and wide-sweeping crimes in human history.”(3)
 
And all this was and is ostensibly to save mankind from even greater evils: nuclear annihilation, mass starvation, and environmental devastation, all claimed to be due to over-population, although a cursory study of history makes it patently clear that the real reason was to enable the financier/oligarchs to increase their wealth and their hegemony of the world’s nations.
 

Overpopulation is a Myth

Overpopulation is a myth. This myth has caused human rights abuses around the world, forced population control, denied medicines to the poor, and targeted attacks on ethnic minorities and women.

Take a look at this short video by Full Documentaries:

 

 

“The concept of overpopulation originated in England in 1798, when the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus saw that food production increased incrementally, while people reproduced exponentially. Based on his calculations, he predicted that the world would be out of food by the year 1980. Malthus blamed reduced mortality rates and encouraged population reduction.

In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among the poor:

P1.1-SyracuseShantySewer1All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.

Not only that, he believed certain diseases should not sought to be cured for the sake of population control.

“But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.”

599324_374718182589568_878234514_nIn 1968, Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University adopted and propagated Malthus’ theory of overpopulation. He claimed that excessive human reproduction has overwhelmed the planet and predicted that the world would undergo massive famines, which would kill off hundreds of millions of people by the end of the 70’s.

The_Population_Bomb

 

 

In his 1968 work The Population Bomb, Ehrlich stated:

The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines–hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.

Because of the fear that such an alarming claims triggered, large sums of money were donated to the UNFPA (the United Nations Population Fund), which was founded the year after Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. This fund thrives on a crisis that – despite being “imminent” – keeps on being rescheduled over and over again for the past 200 years.

Additional Quotes:

Cousteau_en_Calypso“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier

 

 

330px-Международная_Леонардо-премия_10.1“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

 

 

255px-TR_Buckskin_Tiffany_Knife

“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind”

Theodore Roosevelt

 

 

 

 

Reunión_Pinochet_-_Kissinger

Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet shaking hands with Kissinger in 1976

 

 

“Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”

Dr. Henry Kissinger

 

 

 

Georgia_Guidestones-lowres

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”

Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

 

 

Prince_Philip_March_2015

 

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund

 

 

 

Sierra_Club_logo

Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.

David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club

 

 

 

270px-Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court.svg“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

 
 
Scarcity Is A Myth

The world is abundant of resources and could provide for everyone’s need, yet every year rich countries waste more that 220 million tons of food. Meanwhile, the poor still starve to death – not because resources are scarce, but because they don’t have the money or have rights to enough land.

Overpopulation Does Not Cause Hunger, Unfair Management Does

Sociologists Frederick Buttel and Laura Raynolds published a study of population growth, food consumption, and other variables in ninety-three third world countries. The statistics showed no evidence that fast population growth causes hunger. However, they did find that the populations of poorer countries, and those countries where the poorest 20 % of the population earned a smaller percentage of a nation’s total income, had less to eat.

In other words, poverty and inequality cause hunger, not overpopulation.

We blame poverty on scarcity and overpopulation. But seldom do we look at human behavior itself. Seldom do we look at the laws created by none other than humans preventing starving people from having access to food and arable land, or the obvious misdistribution of resources caused by the greed of the minority.

And let’s not forget the “debt” that poor countries “owe” to the rich.

“The history of third world debt is the history of a massive siphoning-off by international finance of the resources of the most deprived people. This process is designed to perpetuate itself, thanks to a diabolical mechanism whereby debt replicates itself on an even grander scale, a cycle that can only be broken by cancelling the debt. ” – Third World Debt, a Continuing Legacy of Colonialism

consumption-inequality-2005-pie

Many nations can’t realize their full food production potential because of the gross inefficiencies caused by inequitable ownership of land and resources.

Many of the countries in which hunger is rampant export much more in agricultural goods than they import. Northern countries are the main food importers, their purchases representing 71.2 % of the total value of food items imported in the world in 1992. Imports by the 30 lowest-­‐income countries, on the other hand, accounted for only 5.2 % of all international commerce in food and farm commodities.

MediaManipulationNetworksInHeadIt is believed that poverty is the result of overpopulation, poor education, racial inferiority or even laziness. But because most people never think to question our current system and the authorities pulling the strings, few realize how the system itself is geared towards enriching the few and enslaving the masses.

The following passage from “The World’s Wasted Wealth: the political economy of waste” by J.W. Smith describes this reality very well:

Land Rights And Ownership

“The often heard comment (one I once accepted as fact) that “there are too many people in the world, and overpopulation is the cause of hunger”, can be compared to the same myth that expounded sixteenth-century England and revived continuously since.

330px-Palestinian_children_and_Israeli_wall

Palestinian children running towards the barrier, August 2004

Through repeated acts of enclosure the peasants were pushed off the land so that the gentry could make money raising wool for the new and highly productive power looms. They could not do this if the peasants were to retain their historic *entitlement* [emphasis is original] to a share of production from the land. Massive starvation was the inevitable result of this expropriation.

There were serious discussions in learned circles about overpopulation as the cause of this poverty. This was the accepted reason because a social and intellectual elite were doing the rationalizing. It was they who controlled the educational institutions which studied the problem. Naturally the final conclusions (at least those published) absolved the wealthy of any responsibility for the plight of the poor. The absurdity of suggesting that England was then overpopulated is clear when we realize that “the total population of England in the sixteenth century was less than in any one of several present-day English cities.”

Petare_Slums_in_CaracasThe hunger in underdeveloped countries today is equally tragic and absurd. Their European colonizers understood well that ownership of land gave the owner control over what society produced. The most powerful simply redistributed the valuable land titles to themselves, eradicating millennia-old traditions of common use. Since custom is a form of ownership, the shared use of land could not be permitted. If ever reestablished, this ancient practice would reduce the rights of these new owners. For this reason, much of the land went unused or underused until the owners could do so profitably. This is the pattern of land use that characterizes most Third World countries today, and it is this that generates hunger in the world.

These conquered people are kept in a state of relative impoverishment. Permitting them any substantial share of the wealth would negate the historic reason for conquest — namely plunder. The ongoing role of Third World countries is to be the supplier of cheap and plentiful raw materials and agricultural products to the developed world. Nature’s wealth was, and is, being controlled to fulfill the needs of the world’s affluent people.

The U.S. is one of the prime beneficiaries of this well-established system. Our great universities search diligently for “the answer” to the problem of poverty and hunger. They invariably find it in “lack of motivation, inadequate or no education,” or some other self-serving excuse. They look at everything except the cause — the powerful own the world’s social wealth. As a major beneficiary, we have much to gain by perpetuating the myths of overpopulations, cultural and racial inferiority, and so forth. The real causes must be kept from ourselves, as how else can this systematic damaging of others be squared with what we are taught about democracy, rights, freedom, and justice?”(4)

Depopulation in the Developed World

KWN-Stockman-III-462015In the developed nations the primary focus was the use of social engineering, which has had a long effective history, with spectacular success leading into and beyond WW I. Edward Bernays was the mastermind of this public manipulation and was very effective at manufacturing consent from the US public to support entering the war.

Bernays was also the mastermind of the social engineering that got women smoking and manipulated them into equating it with freedom, ‘coincidentally’ also at the time that women had recently gotten the ability to vote. Recognizing that women were still riding high on the suffrage movement, Bernays used the equality angle as the basis for his new campaign. He convinced a number of genteel women, including his own secretary, to march in the 1929 Easter Day parade down Fifth Avenue and light up cigarettes in a defiant show of their liberation.
 
Since the goal of the Financier/Oligarchs molding society, was to create a compliant androgenous work force, while also taking all control away from the family unit, vast amounts of resources were devoted to the women’s movement to enable women to gain complete equality with men.
 
05friedan2_184Out of this effort resulted the Women’s Liberation Movement in the 1960s with notable leaders such as Betty Friedan (Betty Naomi Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem. What’s with the name Naomi and feminism anyway?
 
Betty Friedan was one of the founders of the National Organization for Women (NOW) and a co-signer of the original (1966) Agenda of NOW.
 
According to Goldstein:
“We do not accept the traditional assumption that a woman has to choose between marriage and motherhood, on the one hand, and serious participation in industry or the professions on the other.”
 
This all sounds good at first glance, but regardless of what it sounds like, it is but one way by which to attempt to entice women, the majority of whom are found in poll after poll to prefer to be stay-at-home, married moms, to enter the work force. Why would anyone promote an idea that most women don’t like? The answer to that question may be found in the fact that the goal to bring women into the work force is an ancient goal of communism and that Betty Friedan was well into her thirties a devout and active functionary of the Communist Party of the U.S.A.
 
Even a cursory examination of the goals of the creators of the Communist ideology makes it clear that a primary goal of communism was to break up the family, raise children through state institutions and force men and women to function as equal wage slaves of industry.
 
Already in the original Communist Manifesto produced by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848/49 it was made clear that no society could be successfully restructured unless all established cultural and moral traditions would be abolished.
 
So, “how much of the communist ideology that was such large part of Betty Friedan’s life and, indeed, formed her life, made it into the ideology of the oppressive feminism that now covers all aspects of our lives, of society and civilization and threatens to smother us all?”
 
It’s important to understand that the Communist movement in Russia was financed by Rothchild banking interests in the West.
 
Karl_Marx_001The growing socialist movement—which was closely allied at that time to the Republican revolutions fomenting all over the world—was seen as a danger to the rich. Marx was trained and sent in to splinter and disorient this movement, which he did. Marx was sent in to control the opposition. At every juncture, Marx manages to create factions rather than alliances. He deftly prevents any real action by always turning the socialists against themselves. He keeps them arguing over philosophical fine-points rather than encouraging direct and immediate action.
 
What we’re looking at here is the bankrolling and use of similar tactics in the West by the same financier/Oligarchs in order to create a androgenous working proletariat, with the added dose of fascist feminism to prevent men and women joining forces to organize against the wage slavery of a monolithic fascist economic cartel.
 
‘Divide and conquer’ is a standard operating procedure used by every despot that has ever reigned over an unwilling populace. And once race and class have been utilized, dividing the sexes is the final solution. Utilizing agents to create discord between the sexes was much more difficult when men and women, in order to survive, were required to closely join forces. Once industrialization occurred, with its androgenous workforce, and the same financier/Oligarchs also gained total control of the mass media and mass education system, the use of agents to create discord, became highly advantageous.
 
bettyfriedan_narrowweb__300x367,0Communist agents such as Betty Friedan (Goldstein) and Gloria Steinem were utilized and enabled to institute the feminist movement in order to rapidly move the agenda forward.
 
The Oligarchs modus operandi is to finance and promote disgruntled minorities in order to destabilize and undermine the world. Feminism is a prime example. It pretends to be about giving women equal opportunity in the workplace when in fact it is devoted to discouraging women from seeking fulfillment in motherhood while castigating men as being hyper-masculanized, brutish, violent, controlling, unevolved beings.
 
 
The push for women to enter the workforce left an increasing number of them with little time or energy to even consider becoming mothers, which also contributed to the depopulation agenda. The additional incessant media focus on consumption of consumer items and experiences, served to force more and more women into the workforce, ultimately creating a situation where women had no option but to work, married or not, leaving very little time to devote to birthing and raising children.
 
The result…..lower and lower birth rates and as are now commonly seen in the developed nations.
 
And of course, along with feminism came a push for women’s sexual liberation, quickly followed by birth control and abortion, both of which are a key part of the depopulation agenda.
 
300px-Jdr-king“John D. Rockefeller and his foundation have been in the forefront of the population “control” and eugenics movement. Ultimately the goal is to reduce the earth’s population for the simple warped reason that the less there is for you and me, the more there will be for J.D. and his cronies.
 
The financier/oligarchs also push birth control. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Ted Turner are among the ultra rich that have donated billions to spreading the gospel of contraception, abortion, and feminism using the United Nations and “US Aid.” Rockefeller funded the invention of the pill, the IUD and owns the rights to the abortion drug RU-486. In the last 50 years, billions of public dollars have been spent on “family planning” designed to limit population by deceit and coercion, including compulsory abortion and infanticide.
 
In “The War Against Population (1988),” Dr. Jacqueline Kasun writes that in 1981, a directory of population control agencies in Washington DC listed 92 private (but mostly publicly funded) agencies, 12 United Nations and 57 agencies of the US government (p. 198). “The real problem of government family planning is not one of families out of control but of planners out of control,” she wrote (p.211).”(5)
 
330px-MargaretSanger-Underwood.LOCAnd let’s not forget Margaret Sanger. Margaret Sanger was a popular eugenicist, popularized the term “birth control”, promoted the development of birth control pills, opened the first birth control clinic, the Clinical Research Bureau (CRB). The CRB was the first legal birth control clinic in the United States, staffed entirely by female doctors and social workers. The clinic received extensive funding from John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his family, which continued to make anonymous donations to Sanger’s causes in future decades. She also established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
 
This is what she had to say:

“While the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table… They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and…knowledge, which…will have far-reaching results among the colored people…The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The affluent and educated already limited their child-bearing, while the poor and ignorant lacked access to contraception and information about birth-control. Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists. She believed that they both sought to “assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.” Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aims to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.

Gay_flag.svgWhile actively supporting sexual liberation and its necessitated ‘birth control’, the financier/oligarchs also covertly supported “gay liberation,” with the understanding that the homosexual lifestyle added to the destruction of families and served the depopulation agenda. Through funding and media control, they pushed the public to regard sex as a recreation/physical release rather than as the expression of a spiritual bond (i.e. a loving marriage) resulting in children.

Immediately following the new-found sexual liberation was the increasing incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, which along with scare-mongering, were used to push the idea of abstinence, particularly among young people, which also served the depopulation agenda.

The Fluoridation Strategy

Study after study has confirmed that fluoride is a dangerous, toxic poison that bio-accumulates in your body while being ineffective at preventing dental decay. For instance, there are 25 studies showing that fluoride reduces IQ in children, and approximately 100 animal studies have also linked fluoride to brain damage.

Past research, too, has shown that fluoride has potentially disastrous effects on the male reproductive system, reducing fertility.

DocumentNevertheless, since the 1950s there has been ongoing fluoridation of water supplies in the US with currently around 150 million people receiving fluoridated public drinking water. The other developed countries heavily utilizing fluoridation are Canada, Australia and New Zealand. So on top of the social engineering strategies outlined above, all of these countries are also being deliberately subjected to fertility damaging fluoride in their water, adding to the financier/oligarch depopulation goals.

“Water fluoridation, however, is only possible in places with a modern infrastructure of water treatment plants and therefore even in wealthy nations it is only viable in cities that have at least 10,000 people. Salt fluoridation is the second most popular fluoridation method and is in use throughout Latin America and the Caribbean region as well as in a few European countries that have abandoned water fluoridation. Milk fluoridation is restricted to very few countries and is used as a supplementary method of fluoridation elsewhere. To keep human beings in a constant state of fluoride poisoning, toothpaste and dental health products throughout the world are fluoridated.

The Gender-Bender Strategy

An increasing amount of research information is showing that the ingestion, absorption or inhalation of synthetic particular chemical substances drastically impacts the hormonal balance of male physiology and female physiology as well.

375px-Placenta.svgTo the extent that these substances create an imbalance in the pregnant woman or cross the placental barrier into the fetus, they will also have negative effects on the hormonal balance and sexual development of the male or female. Once the child is born, the exposure to these substances will continue to impact the sexual development until maturity is reached.

According to a recent study, “Falling sperm counts could be caused by traces of the contraceptive pill in drinking water.

 

 

“U.S. scientists say the sex hormone oestradiol – the birth control hormone that passes untreated through sewage plants – has an even larger effect on sperm than Bisphenol A or BPA, as it is widely known.  BPA is found in some plastics used to make food containers, bottles and coatings in tin cans, and is also commonly used in thermal paper in cash register receipts.”(8)

Complete_diagram_of_a_human_spermatozoa_en.svg

Bisphenol A (BPA)

“To close the loophole created by the modern habit of drinking bottled rather than tap water, the depopulation lobby has replaced glass with plastic bottling starting in 1980 and has used a specific fertility-depressing chemical, called bisphenol A (BPA) to manufacture two kinds of plastics: polycarbonates and epoxy resins. BPA is ingested when it leaches into food and beverages for human consumption. Since nearly every plastic bottle on the planet is now made of BPA-based polycarbonates and almost every metal and aluminum can in the world is lined with epoxy resins containing BPA, people are chronically exposed. The lining of metal cans with BPA is aimed at both the urban and rural poor who are more likely to eat canned soups, vegetables and fruit and will thus receive more than their share of fertility depressing agents, as they will ingest it from multiple sources. But as the depopulation lobby has a strong eugenic component to it, reducing the numbers of the poor is a desirable outcome.”(3)

SPF15SunBlock“Make no mistake, BPA isn’t the only method being utilized, there are also a whole host of xenoestrogens found in everything from suntan lotions to the food we eat, all ” clinically significant because they can mimic the effects of endogenous estrogen and thus have been implicated in precocious puberty and other disorders of the reproductive system.”
 
Via the Women In Balance Institute, we see a partial list of things used every day in America which include the chemicals that are xenoestrogens, including:

Industrial products and Plastics: • Bisphenol A (monomer for polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin; antioxidant in plasticizers); • Phthalates (plasticizers); • DEHP (plasticizer for PVC); • Polybrominated biphenyl ethers (PBDEs) (flame retardants used in plastics, foams, building materials, electronics, furnishings, motor vehicles); • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs);

Food:• Erythrosine / FD&C Red No. 3; • Phenosulfothiazine (a red dye)• Butylated hydroxyanisole / BHA (food preservative); • Building supplies: • Pentachlorophenol (general biocide and wood preservative); • Polychlorinated biphenyls / PCBs (in electrical oils, lubricants, adhesives, paints);

330px-FLIT_Spray_Can_1Insecticides: • Atrazine (weed killer); • DDT (insecticide, banned); • Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (one of the breakdown products of DDT); • Dieldrin (insecticide); • Endosulfan (insecticide); • Heptachlor (insecticide); • Lindane / hexachlorocyclohexane (insecticide, used to treat lice and scabies); • Methoxychlor (insecticide); • Fenthion; • Nonylphenol and derivatives (industrial surfactants; emulsifiers for emulsion polymerization; laboratory detergents; pesticides);

Other: • Propyl gallate; • Chlorine and chlorine by-products; • Ethinylestradiol (combined oral contraceptive pill); • Metalloestrogens (a class of inorganic xenoestrogens); • Alkylphenol (surfactant used in cleaning detergents; • 4-Methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) (sunscreen lotions); • Parabens (methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben and butylparaben commonly used as a preservative);  •Benzophenone (sunscreen lotions); 

Monsanto_logo.svg“Xenoestrogens, however, come from over 70,000 different chemicals that have a known affect on our hormonal systems. DDT is a big culprit as are numerous fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides used by the non-organic farmers of the world. GMO crops are a huge problem, because they require larger and more pervasive use of these pesticides. Corn, soy, sugar beets, cottonseed oil, zucchini, alfalfa, and Hawaiian papaya are all predominantly grown using genetically modified seed.”(8)
 
“Phthalates, which are used in everything from vinyl floors to plastic tubing and soaps and lotions, are pervasive in the environment and have increasingly become associated with changes in development of the male brain as well as with genital defects, metabolic abnormalities and reduced testosterone in babies and adults.
 
Phthalates are one of several groups of chemicals that have the power to disrupt the endocrine system, both in animals and humans. Nicknamed “gender-benders,” these chemicals are causing the males in many species to become feminized.
 
According to a report issued by ChemTrust last year, HALF of all male fish in British lowland rivers have been found to grow eggs in their testes! And that’s just one eye-opening example of the impact these gender bender chemicals are having on our environment.

EndocrineDisruptors_KailiWillows_Flickr“Their study lists the symptoms found in each of the numerous species tested, which includes testicular cancer, hermaphrodites, genital deformations, low sperm counts, and infertility.

 

Decreased sperm motility and concentration, as well as genital abnormalities in baby boys have been linked to these chemicals.

Common Sources of Phthalates

“Phthalates are found in, among other things:

  • Processed food packaging

  • Hoses

  • Raincoats

  • Shower curtains

  • Vinyl flooring and wall coverings

  • Lubricant and adhesives

  • Detergents

  • Beauty products like nail polish, hair spray, shampoo, deodorants, and fragrances

  • Toys

Other Gender-Bender Chemicals to Watch Out For:

“Endocrine disrupting chemicals are everywhere these days and can be difficult to avoid unless you take decisive steps to limit or eliminate them from your immediate surroundings. This is particularly important if you are pregnant, or planning a pregnancy.

“Reading labels is a necessity these days. PVC plastics, which contain phthalates, will oftentimes carry the plastic recycling symbol # 3.

“Some of the other gender-bender agents to look out for include:

  • 330px-Happy_Pan_PosterPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) — found in grease- and water-resistant coatings like Teflon and Gore-Tex, is a likely carcinogen.

  • Methoxychlor and Vinclozin— An insecticide and a fungicide respectively, have been found to cause changes to male mice born for as many as four subsequent generations after the initial exposure.

  • Nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) — Known to be potent endocrine disrupters, these chemicals affect gene expression by turning on or off certain genes, and interfere with the way your glandular system works. They mimic the female hormone estrogen, and have been implicated as one reason behind some marine species switching from male to female. 

  • Bovine growth hormones commonly added to commercial dairy have been implicated as a contributor to premature adolescence.

  • Soy products, which are loaded with hormone-like substances. 

  • MSG-is-dangerousMSG — A food additive that’s been linked to reduced fertility.

  • Fluoride — This chemical in the U.S. water supply has been linked to lower fertility rates, hormone disruption and low sperm counts.

“Along with the overall health destroying effects of these chemicals is the feminization of males that has become so prevalent at the current time, although these effects have been building over the last 80 years, as more and more anti-testosterone disrupting chemicals have been introduced into the environment, the food supply and various products.”(9)

“These chemicals act to feminize men from the time they are conceived, since the average woman’s body contains close to 250 chemicals from cosmetics, household exposures, pesticides and from environmental pollution.

All of these chemicals end up in women’s bodies since they’re stored in fat and women have more fat tissue than men in their breasts and their hips as well as their butt. When a woman becomes pregnant she begins to expose the male fetus to these chemicals.

NDC 0069-4220-30, Viagra, 100 mg, reverse is Pfizer,

This happens through no fault of the woman, but through the oil, chemical and pharmaceutical companies, which produce and distribute these harmful chemicals throughout the world. Big Pharma has no incentive to reduce this exposure since they make huge profits on the ‘health care’ side of this situation by selling testosterone and Viagra to the millions of men who are emasculated.

By producing and distributing BPA and atrazine, which are found in a variety of foods and products which are used by the public, and which find their way into our drinking water, the chemical companies can make millions of dollars of emasculating men and lowering their testosterone levels in order to make them impotent.

As a result of this onslaught, sperm counts have decreased by 50%, while 85% of sperm cells are defective. Along with this, studies show that almost 30 million men are impotent in the US.

The majority of this damage is done in the womb. Most of these chemicals destroy the cells within the testes that produce testosterone, called the Sertroli cells. So when males are exposed to these chemicals in the womb, they don’t end up with as many Sertroli cells as a normal fetus has, so their testosterone levels go down and they’re less able to produce sperm.

So men today have less sperm produced than their grandfathers did and their testosterone levels are the lowest they’ve ever been in the history of mankind.”(9)

The following video, The Disappearing Male, gives a good overview of the extent of the problem:

 

 

The Poisoned Agriculture Strategy

“A new paper by Rosemary A Mason in the ‘Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry’, indicates there is a growing threat from the release of hormone-disrupting chemicals that could even be shifting the human sex ratio and reducing sperm counts.

Mason cites a good deal of evidence to show how the widespread use on agricultural crops of the systemic neonicotinoid insecticides and the herbicide glyphosate, both of which cause immune suppression, make species vulnerable to emerging infectious pathogens, driving large-scale wildlife extinctions, including essential pollinators.

airplane-465619__340Providing evidence to show how human disease patterns correlate remarkably well with the rate of glyphosate usage on corn, soy and wheat crops, which has increased due to ‘Roundup Ready’ crops, Mason goes on to present more sources to show how our over-reliance on chemicals in agriculture is causing irreparable harm to all beings on this planet. Most of these chemicals are known to cause illness, and they have likely been causing illnesses for many years. But until recently, the herbicides have never been sprayed directly on food crops and never in this massive quantity.(10)

Mason discusses how agriculture and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) fit into a wider agenda for depopulating the planet. She notes that on the initiative of Gates, in May 2009 some of the richest people in the US met at the home of Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and President (2003–10) of Rockefeller University in Manhattan, to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The meeting was hosted by David Rockefeller Jr. These same individuals have met several times since to develop a strategy in which population growth would be tackled.

la-me-c1-assisted-death-20150519-thumbnailThe Rockefeller Foundation (RF) was involved in extensive financing of eugenics research  in league with some of the US’s most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy élite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics’, the systematic killing off of ‘undesired bloodlines’.

RF funded the earliest research on GMOs, which Mason regards as part of the depopulation agenda. The RF funded the earliest research on GMOs in the 1940s and effectively founded the science of molecular biology.

Mason cites Steven Druker to show the fraud behind GMOs and how governments and leading scientific institutions have systematically misrepresented the facts about GMOs and the scientific research that casts doubt on their safety. Druker has shown that GMOs can have severe health impacts, which have been covered up.

RoundupMason then goes on to discuss the impact of glyphosate residues (herbicide-tolerant GM crops are designed to work with glyphosate), which are found in the organs of animals, human urine and human breast milk as well as in the air and rivers. She documents its widespread use and contamination of soil and water and notes that the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer’s assessment of glyphosate being a 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic in humans) is unwelcome news for the agrochemical industry.

She claims that plans are under way to depopulate the planet’s seven million plus people to a more manageable level of between 500–2000 million by a combination of means, including the poisoning and contamination of the planet’s food and water supplies via chemical-intensive industrialised agriculture. Mason also notes that health-damaging GMOs are being made available to the masses (under the guise of ‘feeding the poor’), while elites are more prone to eat organic food.

Mason’s concerns about depopulation should not be dismissed, particularly given the record of the likes of the Gates and Rockefeller clans, the various covert sterility programmes that have been instituted by the US over the decades and the way agriculture has and continues to be used as a geopolitical tool to further the agendas of rich interests in the US.

300px-Dow_Chemical_Company_logo.svgTo understand the processes that have led to modern farming and the role of entities like Monsanto, we must appreciate the geopolitics of food and agriculture, which benefits an increasingly integrated global cartel of finance, oil, military and agribusiness concerns. This cartel seeks to gain from war, debt bondage and the control of resources, regardless of any notions relating to food security, good health and nutrition, biodiversity, food democracy, etc.”(10)

Chemtrails Strategy

spray782-450x292“Spraying powdered aluminum oxide at high altitudes by airplane – a phenomenon known as ‘chemtrails’ – is a rather new method of population control that is restricted to NATO countries and is aimed at breaking the back of organic and traditional farmers to make room for corporations and their genetically modified crops. The aluminum sprayed falls to the ground and poisons the soil and the water, which has two intended consequences: first, it makes the growing of traditional or heirloom seeds impossible and forces farmers into bankruptcy thus freeing the land for purchase by agro-giants who stand ready with aluminum-resistant genetically modified seeds; and secondly, aluminum binds with fluoride compounds and greatly increases fluoride toxicity, therefore reducing the human body’s toxicity threshold level previously thought safe.

In other words, you can do far more damage to human health with aluminum fluoride than you can do with just fluoride and you need less of it. That is why, for example, the spraying of aerosolized aluminum is far more prevalent on the Western seaboard of Canada and the US, where tap water fluoridation is scarce and people ingest fluoride from bottled water and soft drinks as well as canned foods, but at lower levels than people whose tap water is fluoridated.”(3)

Take a look at this video by Geoengineering Watch on the Chemtrail strategy:

 

<p></p>

 

Biological and Bacteriological Methods – Particularly for the Developing World

“Poor countries do not have water treatment plants and therefore cannot fluoridate their water. Salt fluoridation requires the political will and stability necessary to co-opt a select few politicians and bureaucrats, but Africa’s political landscape is volatile and for ever changing. And milk fluoridation is expensive and morally reprehensible as it targets innocent children through free-milk school programs and sickens them when they are young and defenseless. African leaders, moreover, have largely resisted international pressure to poison their people. That is why the depopulation lobby has devised effective methods of population control for Africa specifically and more recently for other poor and reluctant countries whose voluntary cooperation was impossible to gain.”(3)

HIV-AIDS

aids-sufferer-zambia“If the depopulation lobby could not control the number of people born into the world, then they would increase the number of people leaving this world. In other words, if they could not tackle the population problem at the front end of life by controlling fertility, they would and did tackle it at the back end of life by increasing morbidity and mortality. This was deemed necessary for Africa, which resisted any and all attempts at population control.

The HIV/AIDS virus was specifically created for the Sub-Saharan African population by a cooperative effort between Soviet and American scientists in the employ of their nations’ military-industrial establishments. It was designed to do maximum damage by undermining the immune system and to have an affinity for people of color. It gradually achieved its intended goal once it was introduced into the bloodstreams of countless innocents in Africa, Brazil and Haiti by the World Health Organization through its smallpox immunization program that ended in 1980. Infection is as high as 30% in some African nations (5% continent wide) and 70% of all AIDS deaths occur in Africa. More than one million people die in Africa from AIDS annually and nearly two million new infections are registered every year.(3)

Vaccines

66ba7ab1f9cca107eeefc7049453f303“Bioengineered flu strains, such as N1H1, the swine flu and the bird flu viruses, have been used to manufacture mass fear of pandemics and condition the public to the practice of mandatory vaccines or government-mandated vaccinations programs. This will allow the authorities to target specific populations when and if the eugenicists decide that a new deadly strain must be introduced into an unyielding population, as it was done in Africa, Haiti and Brazil until 1980.”(3)

The HPV vaccines have been shown to have serious side effects including causing infertility and spontaneous abortions.

“The World Health Organization (WHO) and its subsidiaries have been actively researching and funding the development of contraceptive / anti-fertility vaccines that prevent full-term pregnancies to take place, for over 20 years. There’s even a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO!(6)

However, no anti-fertility vaccine has ever been placed on the market and promoted as such as of yet.

Instead, as described in a 1993 journal paper published in The British Medical Bulletin, anti-fertility vaccines were being engineered “incorporating tetanus or diphtheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides.”

The authors of this article state:

“The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

nowords1Free tetanus vaccines that were offered to young women of childbearing age for years in countries such as Tanzania, Nigeria, Mexico, and the Philippines, were found to contain human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), which causes spontaneous abortions if the woman becomes pregnant.

While the woman is not technically sterilized, once injected with hCG, she may never be able to carry a child full term thereafter.

HCG-containing anti-fertility vaccines have also been pursued for more than two decades by the Indian National Institute of Immunology, and The Population Council of the Rockefeller University, among others.

In fact, there are no less than 50 research papers detailing research on “contraceptive vaccines” in the PubMed database.

One disturbing paper published in the FASEB Journal in 1993 states:

“… we initiated studies relating to possible mechanisms of action and potential side effects of this vaccine, which should be relevant to world-wide regulation of population growth.”

So again, why the frantic push for the HPV vaccine, created for young, fertile women, when there’s NO solid, rational basis for its use?”(6)

Massive Brazilian Vaccination Program Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Plans

Flag_of_WHO.svg“A much more recent case of illogical mass vaccinations against a minor health problem is that of the massive, mandatory vaccination program in Brazil, which has raised suspicions among international pro-life activists, who note that the program is similar to other vaccination programs in recent years that have included a hidden sterilizing agent in the vaccines.

The campaign to “annihilate rubella” began in early August this year, mandating rubella vaccinations for all women ages 12 to 49, and 12 to 39 for men; a total of 70 million people, despite the fact that only 17 Brazilian children per year suffer birth defects from the disease.

Adolfo Castañeda of Human Life International notes that just two years ago, researchers found that the rubella vaccine used in a similar campaign in Argentina was laced with human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG).

The suspicion that brought about the investigation [into the rubella vaccine] was caused by the fact that there were very few cases of the disease in Argentina, which didn’t merit a large-scale campaign,” Castañeda said, adding, “The ages for women are the same as those who received the vaccines in Nicaragua, where they included a hormone that sterilizes the woman who receives it, and similar to the age of those who received another sterilizing hormone in the Philippines.”(6)

Polysorbate-80

330px-Gardasil_vaccine_and_box_new“There’s no proof of hCG being present in any of the current HPV vaccines.

But there are definite similarities between these other irrational vaccination programs in other countries for relatively minor public health concerns — that turn out to have far more sinister agendas than mere greed – compared to the fervent, irrational push behind the HPV vaccine here in the U.S.

However, Gardasil does contain Polysorbate-80 – a surfactant used in pharmacology to deliver certain drugs or chemical agents across the blood-brain barrier — which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Researchers Gajdova et.al. found that administration of Polysorbate-80 decreased the weight of the uterus and ovaries, and caused chronic estrogenic stimulation. The ovaries of the mice were also without corpora lutea (a mass of progesterone-secreting endocrine tissue that forms immediately after ovulation) and had degenerative follicles.

So what might the estrogenic effects of Polysorbate-80 be on pre-adolescent girls and pregnant women?”(6)

Agenda 21

The UN has been at the depopulation game from its beginning, since the main reason for its existence is to create and maintain an ideal world environment for the financier/oligarchs.

From the Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER:

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.”

The_Hunger_Games_coverOne of the most popular films of 2012 was The Hunger Games which portrayed a post-apocalyptic nation called Panem in which a super-rich, super-pampered, super-callous ‘elite’ lived in high-tech luxury while the rest of the population daily battled to survive in abject poverty, locked away behind prison fences in intensively-populated ‘people zones’. Panem comes from the Latin phrase panem et circenses or ‘bread and circuses’ – a term derived from Rome and meaning to give the people diversions and distractions to hide what is being done to them. Exactly what is happening today.

“Agenda 21 was established at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, hosted by Maurice Strong, a Canadian oil and business billionaire and long-time front man for the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Strong has been a leader of their exploit-the-environment-to-scam-the-people program which is now in full flow. Strong is a member of the Club of Rome, the environmental Hidden Hand in the Round Table network that includes the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations.(7)

Agenda 21 is called ‘the agenda for the 21st century’ and that agenda refers to global fascism/communism. This is a summary of what Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / Biodiversity is seeking to impose:

• An end to national sovereignty

• State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’ (equal slavery)

• The State to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources

• Abolition of private property (it’s not ‘sustainable’)

• ‘Restructuring’ the family unit

• Children raised by the State

• People told what their job will be

• Major restrictions on movement

• Creation of ‘human settlement zones’

• Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they currently live

• Dumbing down education (achieved)

Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above

Iclei_logoThis horrific plan is being coordinated through the United Nations, the stalking horse for world dictatorship, via a non-governmental network once called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), and now known as Local Governments for Sustainability although still using the shortened name ICLEI. The United Nations is now opening ‘embassies’ around the world called ‘UN Houses’ under the guise of raising awareness of UN activities, but not the activities that people really need to know about.

Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and other organisations are integrating the plan into every village, town, city and region and it is already becoming widespread across the world. The organisational infrastructure of Agenda 21 is already at fantastic proportions, and involves government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), think-tanks, trusts, foundations, ‘training’ (mind control) operations and ‘initiatives’ which have been building the infrastructure for what they call ‘the post-industrial, post-democratic’ society — all while the public go about their daily business, oblivious of the prison being built all around them by the hour.

Harvey Ruvin, a vice-chairman of ICLEI, was asked how Agenda 21 would affect liberties with regard to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, private property and freedom of speech. He replied: ‘Individual Rights must take a back-seat to the collective’.

195px-Communist_star.svgA member of the Agenda 21 committees in Santa Cruz, California, in the mid-1990s said that the proposals he heard were so crazy that he laughed at them because they could never happen. These included that ‘Mother Earth’s surface was not to be scratched’; humans should be concentrated in settlement zones; education should focus on the environment as a central organizing principle and all aspects of life covered by Agenda 21. But today, all of these crazy plans are now being introduced. It’s all happy, smiling faces and rhetoric about “how we care”, when the truth is that Agenda 21 is a vicious, brutal, heartless strategy to impose a global Orwellian state and forcibly depopulate humanity.

They want to control every man, woman and child on the planet – everyone and everywhere and every resource, water source and piece of land. To do this they need a global structure of fascist control that goes right down into every local community with the jackboots at local level enforcing the will of the global center. This is why there is so much emphasis on local authorities, and town and city authorities in Agenda 21.

Below is a map of the Reserves and Corridor system being created by Agenda 21:

Agenda-21-Simulated-Reserve-and-Corridor-System-to-Protect-Biodiversity-1024x743

The demand in Agenda 21 for a massive cull of the population can be understood when you see how much of America is designated for no human activity.

The red areas are designated for ‘no human use’ and most of the rest of America is confiscated for little and highly-regulated use. The mass of the population would be concentrated in high-rise, densely-packed ‘human settlement zones’ and denied access to something like 80 percent of present day America. It is without question the world of The Hunger Games with a globally-enforced top-down hierarchy with a world government using its world army and police force to impose its will at regional and local levels (sectors).

The Rockefeller-funded America 2050 has produced a map of the new United States divided into eleven ‘megaregions’ and includes parts of Canada (Figure 2 – above). Seattle, Portland and Vancouver, British Columbia, become the megaregion known as ‘Cascadia’ and this regional system comes under the collective name of ‘megalopolis’ which is Greek for large city or great city. America, Canada and Mexico are slated to merge to form the North American Union in line with the European Union blueprint.

Agenda-21-the-emerging-megaregions-1024x682

As a result of all of these strategies the developed nations are now suffering from deliberate depopulation. The US birthrate has already been cut from 4 to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.1 just for replacement.) Russia (1.17 children) will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015. In the “Death of the West,” Pat Buchanan argues that population decline is responsible for the inevitable extinction of the West.

The charts below show birthrates in some countries:

Capture3

Virtually all of the developed countries are steadily increasing their depopulation rates.

Capture4 And this goes right along with the depopulation plans of the financier/oligarchs.

 

Cites:

(1) Jewish Eugenics

(2) Wikipedia- Zionism

(3) Killing Us Softly

(4) Overpopulation: Fact Or Myth?

(5) The Devil’s Work: Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda

(6) Prominent Scientist Warns of HPV Vaccine Dangers

(7) Agenda 21: The Plan for a Global Fascist Dictatorship

(8) Wiping Out America….. Study Shows Depopulation Agenda Moving Full Speed Ahead

(9) Can These Household Chemicals Crush Your Son’s Masculinity?

(10) Poisoned Agriculture: Depopulation and Human Extinction

Related Posts:

Vaccines

The Zika Virus Hoax

Emasculation and the Feminization of Society

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying

Contrails vs. Chemtrails (Aerosols)

Geoengineering Weather Warfare

GMO Myths and Truths

Hormones

Just Say No To Fluoride!!!

The Complete History Of Monsanto, “The World’s Most Evil Corporation”

Virus Busters, the Tale of 6 Herbal Superheroes

Disinformation Tactics of Shills & Online Trolls/Zombies

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

Vaccines

Many of the people reading this post are here because what they see today or what they’ve experienced doesn’t line up with the message of the Medical System. You’ve decided not to live with your head in the ground and want to know what to do when doctors and the medical system define ‘good’ action as compliant.


 

Vaccine History

To get a clear perspective on the problems concerning vaccines let’s take a look at vaccine history.

“It wasn’t long ago when infections plagued the Western world. Smallpox, scarlet fever, measles, typhoid, diphtheria, whooping cough, and other diseases were once considered a tragic part of life. Starting in the mid-1800s, there was a steady drop in the deaths from all these infectious diseases, decreasing by the mid-1900s to very low levels. The elimination of these diseases is one of the most amazing, yet unsung, public health revolutions in history.(1)

 

funny-victorian-era-photos-silly-vintage-photography-1-575124eed457b__700“Many of us have a picture of the 1800s colored by a myriad of filters that impart a nostalgic and romantic view of that era. You may picture a time when gentleman callers arrived to meet a well-dressed lady in a finely furnished parlor. A time where people leisurely drifted down a river on a paddlewheel riverboat while sip-ping mint juleps. A time of more elegant travel aboard a steam train passing through the beautiful countryside, or a stylish woman dressed in a long, flowing gown, descending from a sleek horse-drawn carriage with the aid of a dapper companion in a top hat. You may think of those times where life was simple and ordered—a seeming utopia, free of the many woes that plague modern society.

P2.7-SnippingBeans

Children snipping beans in Maryland.

“But if those filters are removed and a more objective light is cast upon that time, a different picture emerges. Instead, imagine a world where workplaces had no health, safety, or minimum-wage laws. The 1800s was a century when people put in 12 to 16 hours a day at the most tedious menial labor. Imagine bands of children roaming the streets out of control because their parents were laboring long days. Children were also involved in dangerous and demoralizing work.

 

 

Picture the city of New York surrounded not by suburbs but by rings of smoldering garbage dumps and shantytowns.

Dutch-Hill1-1024x623

“Cities where hogs, horses, and dogs and their refuse were commonplace in the streets. Many infectious diseases were rampant throughout the world, particularly in the larger cities. This is not a description of the Third World, but a large portion of what the United States and other civilized Western countries used to be only a century or so ago.

“Infectious diseases were a constant terror during the 1800s. With increasingly dense populations, wars, and abject poverty, diseases of all varieties exacted a horrendous toll. The poverty-stricken masses carried the brunt of the relentless assaults of these diseases, yet no class was spared. Periodic epidemics and pandemics swept across the globe, wreaking havoc and killing millions, rivaling the horrors of war. Abysmal sanitation, hygiene, nutrition, and working and living conditions, combined with a sense of utter hopelessness, laid the foundation for the devastation.

P1.1-SyracuseShantySewer1

Syracuse, NY—Shanties Back to an Open Sewer.

“Sanitation was not a new concept. In the time of the Old Testament, there were clear-cut biblical rules laid out governing the management and disposal of dangerous human waste and rubbish outside the cities and away from water sources. Greece and Rome also perfected well-regulated public health systems. During the Dark Ages, these ideas simply dropped out of the collective memory in many areas of the world.

“Human smallpox, also known as Orthopox variola, was a notorious infectious viral entity that served up a febrile illness and painful, oozing skin lesions (pox) to its victims. The disease not only disfigured but often led to death.

P2.13-RailroadPlayground

Only a box for a house, and railroad yard for a playground.

“The most deadly feature of the new towns was the close proximity of human beings to each other. For example, the report of a health officer for Darlington in the 1850s found six children, aged between 2 and 17, suffering from smallpox in a one-roomed dwelling shared with their parents, and elder brother and an uncle. They all slept together on rags on the floor, with no bed. Millions of similar cases could be cited, with conditions getting even worse as disease victims died and their corpses remained rotting among families in single-roomed accommodations for days, as the family scraped together the pennies to bury them.”(1)

Smallpox and Vaccines

300px-Ramses_V_mummy_head

“Smallpox is believed to have emerged in human populations about 10,000 BC. The earliest physical evidence of it is probably the pustular rash on the mummified body of Pharaoh Ramses V of Egypt.(3)

 

 

“The deviation of man from the state in which he was originally placed by nature seems to have proved to him a prolific source of diseases. From the love of splendour, from the indulgences of luxury, and from his fondness for amusement he has familiarised himself with a great number of animals, which may not originally have been intended for his associates.(4)

“The cow, the hog, the sheep, and the horse, are all, for a variety of purposes, brought under his care and dominion.”(4)

Dr. Edward Jenner, M.D. 1798

old_norway10

 
From this close association, which became widespread around 12,000 years ago, humans ended up contracting various diseases.
 
“There is a disease to which the horse, from his state of domestication, is frequently subject. The farriers have called it the grease. It is an inflammation and swelling in the heel, from which issues matter possessing properties of a very peculiar kind, which seems capable of generating a disease in the human body (after it has undergone the modification which I shall presently speak of), which bears so strong a resemblance to the smallpox that I think it highly probable it may be the source of the disease.
 
Boskapsskötsel_i_ladugården._Mangskogs_socken,_Värmland,_1911_-_Nordiska_Museet_-_NMA.0043102“In this dairy country a great number of cows are kept, and the office of milking is performed indiscriminately by men and maid servants. One of the former having been appointed to apply dressings to the heels of a horse affected with the grease, and not paying due attention to cleanliness, incautiously bears his part in milking the cows, with some particles of the infectious matter adhering to his fingers. When this is the case, it commonly happens that a disease is communicated to the cows, and from the cows to the dairymaids, which spreads through the farm until the most of the cattle and domestics feel its unpleasant consequences. This disease has obtained the name of the cow-pox.”(4)
–Dr. Edward Jenner, M.D. 1798
 
“A method of inducing immunity known as inoculation, insufflation or “variolation” was practiced before the development of a modern vaccine and likely occurred in India, Africa, and China well before the practice arrived in Europe.
 
明穆宗画像

Longqing Emperor 1567–1572

“The first clear reference to smallpox inoculation was made by the Chinese author Wan Quan (1499–1582) in his Douzhen xinfa (痘疹心法) published in 1549. Inoculation for smallpox does not appear to have been widespread in China until the reign era of the Longqing Emperor (r. 1567–1572) during the Ming Dynasty. In China, powdered smallpox scabs were blown up the noses of the healthy. The patients would then develop a mild case of the disease and from then on were immune to it. The technique did have a 0.5–2.0% mortality rate, but that was considerably less than the 20–30% mortality rate of the disease itself.
 
“Variolation was also practiced throughout the latter half of the 17th century by physicians in Turkey, Persia, and Africa. In 1714 and 1716, two reports of the Ottoman Empire Turkish method of inoculation were made to the Royal Society in England, by Emmanuel Timoni, a doctor affiliated with the British Embassy in Constantinople, and Giacomo Pylarini. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, wife of the British ambassador to Ottoman Constantinople, is widely credited with introducing the process to Great Britain in 1721.
 
“Stimulated by a severe epidemic, variolation was first employed in North America in 1721. The practice had been known in Boston since 1706, when Cotton Mather (of Salem witch trial fame) discovered his slave, Onesimus had been inoculated while still in Africa, and many slaves imported to Boston had also received inoculations. The practice was, at first, widely criticized. However, a limited trial showed six deaths occurred out of 244 who were variolated (2.5%), while 844 out of 5980 died of natural disease (14%), and the process was widely adopted throughout the colonies.
 
..scarred the wrists, legs, and forehead of the patient, placed a fresh and kindly pock in each incision and bound it there for eight or ten days, after this time the patient was credibly informed. The patient would then develop a mild case [of smallpox], recover, and thereafter be immune.
— Dr. Peter Kennedy 1716
 
Lady_Mary_Wortley_Montagu

Portrait of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu

“The inoculation technique was documented as having a mortality rate of only one in a thousand. Two years after Kennedy’s description appeared, March 1718, Dr. Charles Maitland successfully inoculated the five-year-old son of the British ambassador to the Turkish court under orders from the ambassador’s wife Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, who four years later introduced the practice to England.

“Smallpox vaccine, the first successful vaccine to be developed, was introduced by Dr. Edward Jenner in 1796. He followed up his observation that milkmaids who had previously caught cowpox did not later catch smallpox by showing that inoculated cowpox protected against inoculated smallpox.

The word “vaccine” is derived from Variolae vaccinae (i.e. smallpox of the cow), the term devised by Jenner to denote cowpox and used in the long title of his An enquiry into the causes and effects of Variolae vaccinae, known by the name of cow pox.

P4.1-VaccineGoodArm

Multiple site vaccination of 1898, showing a ‘typically good arm.’

 

Vaccination, the term which soon replaced cowpox inoculation and vaccine inoculation, was first used in print by Jenner’s friend, Richard Dunning in 1800. Initially, the terms vaccine/vaccination referred only to smallpox, but in 1881 Louis Pasteur proposed that to honour Jenner the terms be widened to cover the new protective inoculations being introduced.”(2)

“Smallpox vaccines have always been an unknown broth of hundreds of thousands of non-cowpox microbes. The purity was not guaranteed even when smallpox vaccines were advertised as “pure lymph.”(2)

“Dr. Bayly discusses the terminology:

Presumably it is called “pure” because, under the Therapeutic Substances Act (1943) it must not contain more than 20,000 extraneous micro-organisms per cubic centimeter… according to the British Medical Journal (November 4th, 1950) that “With the best of care, heavy bacterial contamination of vaccine lymph is inevitable during its preparation, and as many as 500 million organisms per ml. may be present, particularly in the tropics. They belong mostly to the cocci group, but may include also Bacillus subtilis, Bact. Coli, Pseudomones pyocyanea, yeasts and fungi; anaerobic organisms may also be occasional contaminants.”

Mandatory Smallpox Vaccinations

“Although vaccination for smallpox had been used since the year 1800, the government did not begin to enforce it until the first acts in 1840 and 1853. The 1853 law set the governmental machinery in place to require every child to be vaccinated within three months of birth.

“Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccination movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the Great Demonstration in Leicester, England, in 1885.

cartoon

“By the mid-1800s and into the 1900s, governmental support of vaccination as the only means of controlling smallpox was firmly entrenched. As seen in England in the late 1800s, despite a parent’s belief that a vaccine had caused a child’s injury or death and despite dissenting medical opinions, governments and courts were unified in their decree that vaccination had to be enforced. Fines, seizure of personal property, and imprisonment were instituted to compel the population into compliance of the law based upon the dominant medical paradigm. Punishments were carried out for not vaccinating.

“England, August 1869:

In August [1869] Mrs. Anne Sipple was committed for seven days’ hard labor—an illegal sentence—and confined in a stone cell with an infant of eighteen months, the child deprived of shoes and socks, and a diet of bread and water only for both.

“The year was 1914. Arthur Smith Jr. was a normal, healthy 11-year-old boy living in his home at 8 John Street in New Windsor, New York, with his father, Arthur Smith; his mother, Hilda; and his two sisters, Annie and Jennie. Although not at the head of his class, he did well in school.

“At the opening of the fall school term, a letter was sent to every school in the state of New York. The letter, by Dr. Finnegan of the State Department of Education, called upon the board of education, including every school trustee, to enforce the compulsory vaccination law. The letter stated that if a child was not vaccinated, he or she could not attend school. If kept home for that reason, the parents would ultimately be arrested and sent to prison.

The Sanitation Revolution

“By the mid-1800s, slums had become commonplace settlements in the Western world. New York City had 100,000 slum dwellers living in 20,000 tenement buildings. They were a crowded and vile predicament. Throughout these unsanitary slums, death was ever present. Cholera, typhoid, scarlet fever, smallpox, typhus, and other infectious diseases were never idle.

2D1F84D300000578-3261279-image-a-48_1444091470210
“But during this time, the seeds of change were sowed and slowly took root. It was the beginning of the Sanitation Revolution. A new understanding that filth contributed to human illness had come to light. It was also known that poverty was often a result of such illness and not just the cause. Based on this awareness, projects for the supply of clean water and removal of human and other waste gradually began to be implemented.

“With so many changes occurring due to massive public health initiatives, the dreadful living situation that existed for multitudes dramatically improved by the mid-1800s. Sanitary infrastructure, understanding of hygiene, vastly improved nutrition, labor laws, advances in science, and many other factors coalesced to create a radical shift. Children who were once dying from diarrhea and common infectious diseases were living and thriving in greater numbers within the span of several decades.

The Vaccination Religion

“Vaccination is regarded as the most important health advance in the 20th century by most health professionals and laypeople. Although the dramatic decreases in morbidity and mortality from diseases that occurred in the course of the 20th century have been credited to the introduction of specific vaccines, scant acknowledgment has been given to improving social conditions.

“Despite questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccination by reputable medical men since its introduction, debate has been, and is, increasingly discouraged.

255px-Poster_for_vaccination_against_smallpox“Information published in scientific journals is used to support this position, other views being regarded as “unscientific.”(1)

It has been a received “article of faith” for doctors and nurses, that vaccination is the single most useful health intervention that has ever been introduced. These health professionals have been taught that vaccines are the reason children and adults stopped dying from diseases for which there are vaccines.

They were told that other diseases, such as scarlet fever, rheumatic fever, typhus, typhoid, cholera, and so on, for which there are no vaccines at the time, diminished both in incidence and mortality (ability to kill) due to better social conditions.

You would think—as medical students who are supposed to be moderately intelligent—that some of them would have asked, “But if deaths from these diseases decreased due to improved social conditions, mightn’t the ones for which there are vaccines also have decreased at the same time, for the same reason?” But, except for a very few, they didn’t.

The medical curriculum is so overloaded with information that medical students just have to learn what they hear, as they hear it: non-vaccinatable diseases into the social conditions box and vaccinatable diseases into the vaccines box and then on to the next subject.

Everything they are taught and read in textbooks, both before qualifying as doctors or nurses and through all post-graduate training, reinforces this view.

Most doctors and nurses regard parents who won’t vaccinate their children as ignorant or, if not ignorant, sociopathic, for withholding what the medical professionals believed was a lifesaving intervention and putting everybody else at risk by reducing herd immunity.

camel-vaccine25

The Real Story

If these same doctors and nurses took the time to do a little investigation into the history of disease rates over time, they would see that once emphasis and action was taken to improve sanitation, hygiene and nutrition, the rates of disease dropped steadily from the mid 1800s.

whooping

 

“For example, by the 1950s when the whooping cough vaccine was introduced, data showed that whooping cough was killing only 1 percent of the numbers of people who used to die in England and Wales 50 years before.

 

 

measles

“Official data showed that the same happened with measles. Indeed, when the measles vaccine was introduced to the UK in 1968, the death rate continued to drop steadily, even though the initial uptake of the vaccine was only 30 percent and didn’t get above 50 percent until the 1980s.

“Measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 in the United States. In the 1950’s about 4 million children were born per year. In 1957 the number of children who died with measles was about 93 or 94. Children may die “with measles” but not “from measles”. The use of fever suppressing compounds, like aspirin, raise the death rate “with measles”. The actual cause of death falls under 3 causes: filth, malnutrition and mistreatment. Regarding nutrition, “…when patients with measles are given vitamin A supplements, their complication rates and chances of dying are significantly reduced.” Pg 27 of VACCINES Are They Really Safe & Effective? Edition 2 by Neil Z. Miller.

P4.3-EczemaVaccinatum

Smallpox when induced by vaccination

“Even the much-heralded success story of smallpox vaccination was not what it seemed. The enforcement of the compulsory smallpox vaccination law in 1867, when the death rate was already falling, was accompanied by an increase in the deaths from 100 to 400 deaths per million.”(1)

“Some quotes:
Sanitation Vs. Vaccination – The Smallpox & causes, by Dr. Hadwen:

“Since Edward Jenner demonstrated the use of cowpox vaccine against smallpox in 1796, vaccinations against smallpox were started. Despite this, a smallpox epidemic swept England in 1839 and killed 22,081 people.”

eczema_vacinnatum

Smallpox when induced by vaccination

 

 

“In 1853 the Government made smallpox vaccinations compulsory, but the incidence of the disease kept increasing, …and in 1872 another epidemic killed 44,840 people, most of whom were vaccinated.” [In hospital]”One child lay for two weeks and two days with her eyes scabbed and not a single drop of water was given to relieve her.” (5)

 

 

“[After the 1872 epidemic, Leicester, a city of 200,000 decreased its vaccination coverage to five percent [5%] of its children and put its efforts into sanitation.]

“1878-96 inclusive, unvaccinated Leicester had so few smallpox deaths that the Registrar-General represented the average by the decimal 0.01 per thousand population, equal to ten per million, while for the twelve years 1878-89 there was less that one death per annum. Here we have real immunity, real protection; and it is obtained by attending to sanitation and isolation, coupled with the almost total neglect of vaccination. Neither army nor navy can show any such results as this.”(5)

“World health records.. “World health records (England, Germany, Italy, Mexico, the Philippines, British India, etc.) document the devastating epidemics which followed mass vaccination. The worst smallpox disaster occurred in the Philippines, after 10 years (1911-1920) of a compulsory U.S. program which administered 25 million vaccinations to its population of 10 million. The result: 170,000 cases and more than 75,000 deaths from smallpox. History past and present is replete with similar tragedies. “Public education” by vaccine producers and their supporters always omits self-incriminating facts.”

” Professor George Dick, speaking at an environmental conference in Brussels in 1973, admitted that in recent decades, 75% of British people who contracted smallpox had been vaccinated. This, combined with the fact that only 40% of children (and a maximum of 10% of adults) had been vaccinated, clearly shows that vaccinated

And let’s not forget these:

polio

1. Before the modern era, polio was a mild disease seldom resulting in paralysis.
2. The largest epidemic occured about 1950 and had significantly declined by 1955 when vaccine was first introduced.
3. Disease can not be ‘conquered’ without addressing the disease cause.
4. Disease is not caused by a lack of “cow-pus”, rotting material or carcinogenic poisons in the bloodstream.
5. Polio causes included:

  • pre-polio vaccines
  • nutritional imbalances
  • environmental poisons- most notably pesticides

P12.5-DDTTruckSpraying

 

The fact that polio incidence increased after WWII and was only a minor problem before 1900 are clues that polio was a man made disease mainly caused by chemical pollution, as a result of, most notably, persistent pesticides which were used very carelessly. Sometimes parks were sprayed with DDT at the same time children were playing. Flys on milk cows were sprayed with not a thought of contaminating the cow’s milk and thus poisoning children as a result.”(5)

 

scarlet

 

 

 

 

 

typhoid

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let’s look at the graph above once again:

G11.2-UK-Deaths-1838-1978-1024x650

And by the numbers:

Capture83


 

Did we ever really need vaccinations?

 

What about Herd Immunity?

“The Herd Immunity concept is that you’re irresponsible if you don’t vaccinate yourself and your child since you’re putting other people at risk.

“There’s a few problems with that theory:

  1. A significant number of people are getting vaccinated and then infecting other people, oftentimes shortly after they’re vaccinated.
  2. If people trust their vaccines they shouldn’t be worried about what someone else is doing.

“Now that the ability exists to determine whether a person is infected with a vaccine strain or a wild strain of measles, it has been clearly substantiated that those who are vaccinated do directly infect others. This happens with rodovirus, it happens with oral polio virus, it happens with measles and it’s always been known to happen with rubella.

“When people want to use the Herd Immunity argument it’s not very rational and the concept of herd immunity came from a time when people were not vaccinating.”(6)

Vaccine Safety

“The safety of a vaccine is related to the condition of the person receiving it.

“You could have a disease that the doctor doesn’t know about like an immunoglobulin deficiency or cancer or a mitochondrial disease or a genetic disorder and you get the vaccine and the vaccine can trigger a problem. And the doctor will blame you because you had a pre-existing condition and claim that it is not necessarily a problem of the vaccine.

“Most of the time, with vaccine trials, the vaccines are tested on healthy people.

“If you’ve had anemia or you’ve recently had a blood transfusion or you’re on certain medications, they won’t take you in a trial for a vaccine, but they’ll still offer you the vaccine later.”(6)

Vaccine Response

“There are two branches of our immune system.

We don’t have vaccines for every disease and we don’t die from every disease.

So we must have another ability to fight disease than just memory immunity, which is what vaccines are supposed to give you, is memory immunity in your blood.

You have a line of defense in your blood, a cellular defense, called innate immunity, which includes cells and some non-specific antibodies that are ready to go on the attack.

And there’s also a branch of immunity called humoral immunity that has to do with preformed antibody.

What is found with vaccinations is that 15-18% of children don’t respond with a cellular response and 12-14% don’t respond with a humoral response.”(6)

“Around 39% were found to have a defect in response to CMI and/or HI in the healthy controls.

When these numbers are compared to the 3-5% of children that are not vaccinated, it’s clear that the greater issue revolves around the number of non-responders to vaccination.”(6)

Genetic and Epigenetic Changes

“So what happens on a genetic level when children are vaccinated?

We’re told the vaccines are one-size-fits-all. That the same vaccine is given to everybody and that everybody will have a similar response when it comes to being protected against the target microbe.

What else happens in the body after the vaccination?

When a group of children were vaccinated researchers had the ability to see which genes are activated to produce proteins. When the different actions generated were broken down the resulted in the following list:

The results are known as epigenetic effects since they are not genetic mutations, but a gene activation. Scientists use to believe that our genes are our destiny but recent information demonstrates that they are not our destiny, since only a small percent of our genes dictates what happens to us. Our destiny has to do with what those genes are told to do and what those genes are told to do has a great deal to do with we are exposed to.

Scientists know that smoking or even eating rice has an effect on an individual’s epigenetic profile. So any injection is sure to change the epigenetic profile. Depending on the impact on the cell of different substances, the genetic material in the cell will be given different signals which produce different instructions for the production of proteins inside the cell. So up-regulation of epigentic instructions lead to the effects listed in the chart above.

Each individual can have very different responses than other individuals that receive the vaccination, depending on a myriad of different biological variations that typically exist in each human body. The genes that will be up-regulated will be different in each individual.

So even if the vaccine works there are so many other things that are being changed with the body.

And it is well known that many of the chemicals in vaccines are stirring up the immune system in ways that are not normal.

In a study from 2008 that was a Swedish study that looked at infants after their DPT and Polio-Hib vaccines. The babies got their regular vaccines at 3 and 5 months and then they took some blood and exposed it the the Whooping cough vaccine and looked to see what happened 12 hours later at a genetic level.”(6)

The following chart shows what the doctor reported:

“So these genes are being woken up and it doesn’t necessarily cause these problems to occur right away in everybody but what is unknown is what happens if something doesn’t come along and shut these back down.

And the immunological explanation for the non-specific effects of vaccines is not known at present.”(6)

Withholding Vaccines

Some studies have been to see what happens if vaccines are not given to children.

The following chart show the results from one study:

Examining health histories of unvaccinated children shows the they have far fewer allergies, far fewer cases of asthma and require far less applications of antibiotics than vaccinated children whether vaccinated with DTP or DTaP.

The overreaction to normal environmental factors could be a result of the abnormal programming of the immune system in very young children, due to vaccinations.

Vaccination Reactions

Only 1 in 10 reactions to vaccinations is ever recorded.

As of August of 2012 in the US there have been 67 deaths and 22,143 adverse events related to any vaccines containing Tetanus vaccine, so the reaction to these vaccines is something to look carefully at.

Autoimmunity

“We are made of protein and water and bacteria and viruses are also made of protein. So how come we can have bacteria on our skin and probiotics in our intestines that are actually good for us and we don’t get sick from them.

Why is it that one person can get along fine with the microbes that surround us while another has strong negative reactions to these microbes. Nature has devised us to be one with the microbial world.

In the intestines are an amount of bacteria that outnumber the cells in the body by 10 to 1 and the number of viruses in the intestines outnumber the number of bacteria in the intestines. We don’t get sick as a result of this because nature has devised a way for our body to harmoniously live with these microbes because they’re so similar to the proteins forming the body’s cells.”(7)

If you don’t react to these microbes you don’t react to yourself:

The proteins from the viruses and bacteria in vaccines are so similar to the proteins in our body that it’s very hard to create a vaccine that the body will respond to.

Adjuvants and Aluminum

For that reason an adjuvant such as aluminum is added to the vaccine to make the immune system respond, because normally if an individual is injected with DTaP or Tetanus Toxoid, they would not respond to it, because the body has already been introduced to many of these proteins and it is programmed to not respond.”(7)

An adjuvant is an agent that modifies the effect of other agents, in this case in a vaccine.

“This is important when it comes to autoimmunity. Something happens to break this tolerance we have to normal protein and our immune system starts to attack our own body cells.

The problem is that many vaccines contain proteins that are the same as some protein segments in the body.

The decision to put aluminum into vaccines was made back in the 1940s to cause a reaction to the vaccine.

So how did they come up with the plan to use aluminum?

They were giving the vaccines for diphtheria and tetanus and they found that they weren’t having much of an immune response and they needed something to make it work more vigorously. And they found that when they used dirty vials to make the vaccines that the vaccine worked better. And one of the vials had aluminum in it and they found that that worked really well.

At the time there were many scientists saying that aluminum shouldn’t be put in food and that it certainly shouldn’t be injected, but these scientists were ignored.

Currently, scientists are saying that even though not everything is known about the effects of aluminum in the body, what is known is not good. It has no biological purpose except to rev up the immune system.

Back then there were just a few vaccines that contained aluminum, but today more than half of pediatric vaccines contain aluminum and they are given earlier and earlier, before babies even have their kidney function up to normal, they are given big doses of aluminum, which can get into the brain, which can alter the immune system, which does epigenetically alter gene function, which changes how enzymes work.

So these huge doses of aluminum are given to babies today, with these vaccines, to get the body to respond and we’re told, don’t worry, because the kidneys get rid of it, but it’s not true when it comes to babies and research backs that up.

They also tell us that we shouldn’t worry about aluminum because it’s in the environment, it’s in the earth’s crust, because it’s in breast milk, because it’s found in our bodies, so it must be OK.

There’s a huge difference between eating aluminum and being injected in a muscle with aluminum. Even being injected intravenously, it’s better than being injected in a muscle with aluminum. The needle going into that muscle stimulates the immune system, it shows damage, releasing particles from inside cells that stimulates the immune system and the aluminum is added, which creates a spark that creates fire. And that fire may not be put out.

And now this fire has possibly been created against ourselves, because of the similarity of the proteins in the vaccines and our own proteins.

There is no way that the doses of aluminum given to babies today is not a problem and that it needs to stop. The aluminum can go into other body parts including the lymph nodes and the brain, it can react with our own proteins and enzymes, alter gene function and it has many known harmful effects.

It might not kill you but in certain populations it can make children and adults sick.

Aluminum forces the immune system to overreact so you can be vaccinated and hopefully immunized. This can lead to an overreaction to germ proteins which may be identical to body proteins. the immune system can then attack body proteins in the brain, nerves and joints.(7)

Let’s take a look at the effect of Tetanus vaccine toxin/Toxoid:

So some of the autoimmunity that exists in society today is directly related to vaccination.

So how safe is aluminum?

And then there’s this quote from Paul Offit, a US vaccine inventor:

This statement is absolutely false and goes against all existing research evidence.

He also puts forth the following reasons for his claims:

These statements are deceptive and completely unscientific. What’s actually happening with aluminum blood levels during pregnancy, is that aluminum and lead, which was previously stored in the mother’s bone, is being mobilized in order to release minerals to the baby.

Just because higher levels of aluminum are found in premature babies doesn’t mean the aluminum is beneficial. It could mean that it’s causing harm. Aluminum is likely a cause of preterm birth not evidence that aluminum is normal. Preterm birth is a definite sign of poor health and Paul Offit’s own references, that he uses to support this nonsense, prove him wrong.

Here’s another outrageous claim by Paul Offit:

Paul Offit is a vaccine inventor, he has been granted a position in medicine to decide what vaccines a baby gets, what the laws regarding vaccine refusal should be and whose voice is the right one to listen to.

Follow the Money!

A meta-analysis done in 2004 sums up the current attitude toward aluminum in vaccines with the following comments:

And the following statement from the analysis:

Autism and Vaccines

“When looking at children with autism it’s important to keep in mind that autism usually involves more than just vaccination. It involves the whole immune system of the child.

The immune system begins to develop within days of conception and even the mother’s immune system changes at conception, so even the mother’s immune system contributes to the development of autism in the child.

It is now known that maternal immune activation has a contribution to schizophrenia, to depression and to autism in children and adults. It doesn’t matter if the mother’s immune system was stimulated by a war, or by a virus, or a bacteria or a vaccine, the inflammation that occurs as a result of maternal immune activation determines how the babies brain develops. Normal brain growth doesn’t occur in autism.

With autism are found bigger brains than normal, along with a high degree of inflammation, the immune systems aren’t functioning normally and the bowels are abnormal.

Even being given oxytocin during delivery updates the percentage of autism in males by 30%. The oxytocin was taken from a cow brain and injected into the mother which epigenetically changes something in the baby.”(7)

Breast Milk vs. Formula

“Breast milk is a continuation of the immunity that existed in the uterus. It’s vitally important for the baby to receive breast feeding for at least 6 months and the World Health Organization even recommends continuing breast feeding for up to 2 years of age.

The reason for this is that it continues to keep the baby in an anti-inflammatory state. Everything from conception to a least 1 year of age is acting to keep the baby’s immune system from being anti-inflammatory, in order to keep the baby’s body anti-inflammatory.

Mother’s milk is deadly to pneumococcal cells and deadly to cancer cells and it’s action takes place without causing inflammation.

The types of microbes that go into the baby’s intestines change the inflammatory pre-disposition of the baby. The microbes from breast milk are anti-inflammatory, but if formula is given the microbes are totally different and one bottle of formula will change the baby’s intestine for 2 weeks.”(7)

Vaccination

Research shows that as other countries change their vaccination programs to match the US, their autism rates go up.

In the US today:

There has been a tremendous increase in the number of children with autism over the last 15 years.

In 1995 there was an increase of about 6,000 cases in school children age 6-21 and by 2011 the increase in this age group reached around 37,000.

So what’s going on here?

The US vaccine schedule as of 2012 included 49 doses of 14 vaccines:

index

There is a tremendous amount of evidence that shows that the current vaccination rate and the amount of aluminum injected into the children are both contributory factors in the development of autism.

When looking at medical studies it’s important to study the research of independent researchers since research funded by the pharmaceutical industry, or by universities receiving funding from the pharmaceutical industry tend, in known to be of lower quality and usually has a desired endpoint before the study is even done, which inevitably affects the supposed findings.

ScientificMethodThenNow

A study in 2011, by 2 independent researchers, Tomljenovic and Shaw showed that the more aluminum given and the sooner it is given, the more the incidence of autism rates.

Animal Cells in Vaccines

So what sort of animal cells are added to vaccines:

“Human cells started to be used in vaccines because the vaccine producers were having problems with animal cells. From the 1950s to the 1990s there was a cancer virus (SV40) in monkey kidney cells that didn’t cause any problem to the monkey, but was correlated to tumors in the brains and lungs in humans, and the Italian doctor, Dr. Carboni, that’s done most of the research on this virus, calls this virus the ‘perfect war machine’, because he says he couldn’t have designed a better cancer virus if he was able to.

So this has been a problem with animal cells, that there’s been other types of viruses that come along with the animal cells.

So the idea was to utilize the human cells since they can be controlled better and they should then be safer.”(7)

The catch here is that the human fetal cells used all contain retroviruses, which are prevalent in the human body.

“A retrovirus is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus with a DNA intermediate and, as an obligate parasite, targets a host cell. Once inside the host cell cytoplasm, the virus uses its own reverse transcriptase enzyme to produce DNA from its RNA genome — the reverse of the usual pattern, thus retro (backwards). This new DNA is then incorporated into the host cell genome by an integrase enzyme, at which point the retroviral DNA is referred to as a provirus. The host cell then treats the viral DNA as part of its own genome, translating and transcribing the viral genes along with the cell’s own genes, producing the proteins required to assemble new copies of the virus. It is difficult to detect the virus until it has infected the host. At that point, the infection will persist indefinitely.

In most viruses, DNA is transcribed into RNA, and then RNA is translated into protein. However, retroviruses function differently – their RNA is reverse-transcribed into DNA, which is integrated into the host cell’s genome (when it becomes a provirus), and then undergoes the usual transcription and translational processes to express the genes carried by the virus. So, the information contained in a retroviral gene is used to generate the corresponding protein via the sequence: RNA → DNA → RNA → polypeptide.”(8)

This all boils down to the fact that retroviruses can alter the genetics within the cell, triggering specific effects, which can alter or initiate potentially damaging biochemical processes.

“The introduction of the use of these human fetal cells into vaccines has led to a rise in the autism rates. Dr. Theresa Deisher from Stanford University has shown that the combination of fetal DNA and the retroviruses is highly likely a contributor to abnormal brain function leading to autism and cancer.

Dr Deisher, lead scientist and SCPI founder has noted that, “Not only are the human fetal contaminated vaccines associated with autistic disorder throughout the world, but also with epidemic childhood leukemia and lymphomas.”(7)

The genetic material from vaccines can incorporate into our genome.

So how much exogenous DNA is permitted in vaccines?

So, when it comes to the pharmaceutical manufacturers, recommendations are one thing and what happens in reality is completely different. Which, when extrapolated across all pharmaceutical activities, should serve to spark a strong distrust of this industry.

“There are a large number of publications about the presence of human endogenous retrovirus and its association with childhood lymphoma. The MMR II and chickenpox vaccines an indeed all vaccines that were propagated or manufactured using the fetal cell line WI-38 are contaminated with this retrovirus.”

“Manufactured childhood vaccines in human fetal cell lines, with its associated retroviral and human DNA fragment contaminants, fulfills all of the necessary requirements as a primary trigger for autistic disorder.”

Theresa Deisher, PhD

Manufacturing Consent

“When it comes to the decision whether to utilize vaccinations for oneself or for one’s child, any rational person would be interested in studying the known information about vaccinations before deciding whether or not to use them.

In other words one would make an informed decision.

In 1997 the World Health Organization (WHO) formulated a world strategy which it released in a book called The CVI Strategic Plan- Managing Opportunity and Change: A Vision of Vaccination for the 21st Century.

This strategy laid out a map for changing how people thought about vaccines. The plan had key points that were using the Media to structure messages that shaped public opinion, to co-opt or persuade key opinion people in all levels of society, Medical, lay and entertainment.

The goal was to get spokespeople at every level speaking one message and one message only.

The plan emphasized private-public partnership and philanthropy with the aim to make vaccines a core topic in society.

Things got moving in a big way when Bill Gates stepped up to take his place in the World Health Organization. Private stakeholders have existed for a long time, but the game moved into high gear with the Gates funding. In 2010 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $10 Billion to the WHO in order to make 2010 and 2020 The Vaccination Decade.

With that funding by 2015 the focus shifted to making vaccinations mandatory for all people, which has been successful in some places, making vaccines a lifestyle event for all people from cradle to grave, and broadening the appeal of live virus vaccines for the immune system benefits, not just for their disease preventing benefits.

According the WHO:

Today we have a billionaire software developer, the pharmaceutical industry, academia and the US Department of Homeland Security and the World Health Organization all speaking and working in unison toward the same goals.

This should have anyone who is paying attention to ask a lot of questions, since the goal is to restrict our health freedom, to censor what we can read and say and remove our ability to choose what goes into our bodies.

2015 will be remembered by those who pay attention as one of unprecedented activity in the war against a new public menace, the vaccine hesitant.

What we saw in 2015:

A Disneyland spectacle where about 140 people were infected with measles.

Shortly after that we had a surge of Media outlets and the CDC making announcements with half-truths and California parents losing their ability to conscientiously object to vaccinations.

There are still a number of state legal battles going on to maintain parental vaccine objection , with many having been overturned the ban.

There’s an ongoing lawsuit against Merck by two virologists that were formerly employed by Merck Vaccines, who are suing them on the basis of fraudulent testing of the Mumps portion of the MMR vaccine.

A CDC whistleblower named William Thompson came out and said that there was a collusion between Thompson and four research associates to cover up data that showed higher autism rates in African-American boys.

But then Thompson went quiet.

Then he stated that he was awarded a performance based award from the CDC after his public statement. He said that he wanted to be left alone to focus on his job and family.

He continues to go to work at the CDC.

What happened between his pang of conscience and his current silence?

And now we’re seeing censorship of any anti-vaccine views, even of delaying vaccines or altering the schedule at all, the portrayal of refusers as insane and obstinately stupid.

And we’re seeing whole new propaganda that centers around a very important medical paper that came out in 2015, which underlies a lot of what’s happening here and re-enforces the goals.”(10)

The following is an example from the popular press:

“In order to ‘scare the crap out of’ parents they have to restrict information, because when doctors and parents have all the facts and make the connections between their children’s sickness and vaccines, they want to know more and they’ll start looking for themselves.

So, in order to plug holes in the dam that’s starting to crack, journalists also have to be censored.

Dr. Paul Offit, a figurehead, pro-vaccine doctor in the US, who makes recommendations to doctors and advisory panels, says that journalists who discuss or print anti-vaccine facts should be jailed.”(10)

“Most journalists are now terrified to say anything that could lose sponsorship, but the few that are still interested in balanced discussions must be censored, not just according to Paul Offit, but also according to Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, who served from 2009 to 2014.”(10)

Here’s what she said to Readers Digest in 20110:

This has long been the ethos even when the evidence and arguments have been well founded.

As shown in the Federal Register from 1984:

“It doesn’t get any plainer than this.

The open threats to non-vaccinators recently reached out in every direction.

Doctors are under threat everywhere.

Doctors who see things that make them lose sleep, rarely risk everything and speak, because it will hit them in the back pocket.

They are also terrified of becoming Wakefielded.

The fact is that Wakefield was pro-vaccine and all he did was suggest a possible link between autism and measles vaccines based on clinical case studies and colon biopsies of vaccinated autistic children.

The pro-vaccine commandment is that doubt is not allowed to exist, so Wakefield’s name was made synonymous with fraud, by the pro-vaccine, which continued to manipulate the facts.

In the US, journalists, who parrot information, call to have doctors’ licenses revoked.”(10)

And then there’s the move to sue parents who don’t vaccinate their kids:

“When non-vaccinators are kicked out of the office doctors then turn around and say that the other forms of healing that those parents turn to are quackery, dangerous and can kill you because you aren’t using their medicine.

Fortunately many intelligent parents see that the medical system is fear mongering. Once parents have enough knowledge and experience, they no longer feel doctor dependent, because they realize how easy it is to not need doctors.

And this works as long as the parents have the freedom to choose and the medical system knows this, which is why they’re now turning up the heat.

While non-vaccinating parents are treated with disdain, what happens when a previously compliant parent wakes up and asks the following question:

Why did all of these problems start after that/those vaccines?

The doctor automatically rejects the question. If the parent persists in their questioning, rejection becomes disdain and hostility. The angry doctor may call them paranoid, neurotic, stupid, unqualified, hysterical or dangerous.

Doctors that raise the same question are often treated with the same hostility and accused of having blood on their hands.

Those in the medical system sometimes tolerates independent thinking but they don’t encourage anything that disturbs the status quo.

Doctors are told that the science is settled on everything vaccine, but when the so-called evidence is compared to the historic and scientific literature, it becomes clear the the education given to doctors today is a oppressive form of religion, preached as gospel by leading authorities who act as if they’re narrow truth is the only righteous belief. Explaining the broader concepts is to them akin to heresy, even if it’s right there in their peer reviewed medical journals.”(10)

And this same pro-vaccine doctor said the following irresponsible statement:

“Mayo Clinic doctors like Greg Poland, now determine for Google what is vaccine fact and what is vaccine fiction. This is a desperate measure to silence those who question vaccines and try to find information that’s not permitted on mainstream media.”(10)

Doctors are told, by Dr. Robert Jacobson at Mayo Clinic, to keep it simple.

The following if from one of Jacobson’s powerpoint presentations:


 

Live Viral Vaccines Hype

“In 2015 the pro-vaccine tossed out a new radical message, that live viral vaccines, even the smallpox vaccines, have beneficial effects beyond what you may have ever dreamed.

Suddenly in May of 2015 the public was told that vaccines had extra-special benefits which could magically prevent people from dying of other diseases than what they were vaccinated for.

The two tools used to push these beliefs were unintelligible math and incorrect immunology.

With the key vaccine hero, MMR, rushing to the rescue, but with BCG and smallpox tossed in for variety, the public was told that live viral vaccines have wonderful non-specific effects which make long term death less likely.

But then they were told that measles disease is worse than anyone had noticed before in an article released in 2015. This article was part of a carefully orchestrated plan, piggybacking on the Disneyland measles outbreak’s Forbes magazine cluster bombs and it was backed up by legislative action in the US.”(10)

The message to parents was that vaccines make children glow with supernatural strength and that:

And here’s the paper that these claims were based on:

“The research for this paper was funded by Bill Gates. The explanatory language of the paper is unaccessible to most people, which was probably intended from the start. Most doctors haven’t been able to get their heads around the medical argument presented. The lead author is a medical student who appears to know very little about measles in the the real world but who, by his own admission, loves to fiddle with statistical models.

Here we have a medical student partnering with a computer geek to produce statistical models so complex your eyes would glaze over.”(11)

The important goal here was to give the public a simple explanation, so here is what the public was told:

“And theory here is that measles disease suppresses the immune system causing immune amnesia for a long time after the infection.

The problem with this theory is that long term immune suppression from measles disease was never a real phenomenon, and was based on wrongly interpreted vaccine results in Africa.”(11)

The fact, studies have shown that measles infected children have lower mortality rates than uninfected children:

And most of the measles cases that did better were not vaccinated.

So Mina’s claim above are false and thus when the question is asked:

“One of the key points to remember here is that the first time that Mina and his co-authors ran the data with their first set of assumptions, they didn’t actually see what they wanted to see. They had to change their assumptions and the way they wanted to analyze the data.”(11)

“The real question of the credibility of this study doesn’t lie in the data manipulation at all. The big flaw in this study lies in the immunology assumption, which was the second hypothesis.

The hypothesis stated that:

The measles infection reduces the immune system memory to an empty shell.

Implying that all diseases for which one was vaccinated or had gained natural immunity to, once again, after the measles infection, became not just an individual threat, that they could get infected again, but also a community threat, as Grenfall, in the paper alluded.”(11)

The papers they use to supposedly substantiate this claim are contradictory or contain no substantiation at all:

“Mina and De Vries are banking on doctors being too busy to go and read the references backing up their claims. Because doctors are too busy to check, nobody challenges anything.

The final sentence of the De Vries summary paper listed above states:

Clinical studies are required to test our hypothesis that measles immune suppression is mainly a numbers game.

Yet, not 5 months later, after no clinical studies at all had been done, Mina and Osterhaus, who were thanked in that paper, are presenting mathematical models that they say validate a non-clinical monkey hypothesis.

Dr. Aaby made it very clear that there was no persistent T-lymphocyte suppression in infected children 2 months after infection. By then everything was back to normal.”(11)

In a 5 year followup study done by Dr. Aaby:

And from Dr Aaby:


Which proves that there is no lethal suppression of the immune system, but that the immune system is actually strengthened which invalidates the claims in Mina’s paper, along with the validity of the any fear mongering that would supposedly be warranted.

Cites:

(1) Dissolving Illusions

(2) Wikipedia- Smallpox Vaccine

(3) Wikipedia- Smallpox

(4) Dissolving Illusions- Jenner

(5) Vaccination Liberation- Smallpox

(6) Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on Vaccines and Health- Part 1

(7) Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on Vaccines and Health- Part 2

(8) Wikipedia- Retrovirus

(9) Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on Vaccines and Health- Part 3

(10) Dr. Suzanne Humphries Manufactured Consent Part 1

(11) Dr. Suzanne Humphries Manufactured Consent Part 2

Related Posts:

The Zika Virus Hoax

Virus Busters, the Tale of 6 Herbal Superheroes

Veganism and It’s Discontents

The Wonderful Coconut

The Complete History Of Monsanto, “The World’s Most Evil Corporation”

The Brain and Neurodegeneration- Part 1

The Brain and Neurodegeneration- Part 2

The Brain and ADHD

Hormones

GMO Myths and Truths

Geoengineering Weather Warfare

DHA- Essential For Optimal Health

Coconut Oil- Superfood

Chemtrail (Aerosol) Spraying